观点:化学势和材料基因组

Long-Qing Chen
{"title":"观点:化学势和材料基因组","authors":"Long-Qing Chen","doi":"10.1002/mgea.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Materials Genome Initiative started almost exactly a dozen years ago in the US.<span><sup>1</sup></span> However, if one asks the question “what is materials genome?” to 100 people, it is a good bet that one would get 100 different answers. To the author's knowledge, there is still no generally agreeable definition of what materials genome is, unlike from the human genome, which has a much clearer definition.<span><sup>2</sup></span> In some way, the Materials Genome Initiative has been mainly used as a rallying slogan for advocating multiscale modeling, closed-loop integration, and iteration between computation and experiments, and more recently, the applications of data science, machine learning, and artificial intelligence to materials science and engineering.<span><sup>3, 4</sup></span> Therefore, the main purpose of this article is to offer the author's perspective on what could be considered as the materials genome.</p><p>Gibbs defined a simple system as one without interfacial, gravitational, electrical, and magnetic contributions and introduced a set of basic thermodynamic variables to describe an equilibrium state of a simple system.</p><p>An equilibrium state is defined as a state in which all the state variables no longer vary with time. However, it should be noted that an equilibrium state does not have to be a stable state; it can be stable, metastable, or unstable. An unstable equilibrium state is intrinsically unstable with respect to any small fluctuations in the state variables, whereas a metastable equilibrium state is stable against small fluctuations in state variables but unstable with respect to large fluctuations. A stable equilibrium state is stable against any fluctuations, large or small. Therefore, unstable and metastable equilibrium states can only be arrested kinetically in practice. However, we hypothesize that all states, including unstable and metastable states, can be described by the same set of basic state variables and the fundamental equation of thermodynamics.</p><p>These independent variables are called the natural variables for <i>U</i> because only when <i>U</i> is expressed as a function of its <i>n</i> + 2 natural variables, Equation (1) is a fundamental equation of thermodynamics.</p><p>Therefore, we have 2<i>n</i> + 5 total basic thermodynamic variables, which are related by <i>n</i> + 3 equations with <i>n</i> + 2 of them being equations of state (Equation 4) and one integrated fundamental equation of thermodynamics (Equation 1). Therefore, the number of independent variables, given by 2<i>n</i> + 5 − (<i>n</i> + 3) = <i>n</i> + 2, is often called the number of degrees of freedom for a system.</p><p>Here, it should be noted that <i>x</i><sub>1</sub> + <i>x</i><sub>2</sub> + … + <i>x</i><sub><i>n</i></sub> = 1; there are only <i>n</i> − 1 independent composition variables. All the thermodynamic properties of a material can be determined from the knowledge of chemical potential <i>μ</i> as a function of temperature, pressure, and chemical composition, <i>x</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>x</i><sub>2</sub>, …, and <i>x</i><sub><i>n</i></sub>. All the macroscopic thermodynamic properties derived from the fundamental equation of thermodynamics in terms of chemical potential are size-independent.</p><p>Similar to the chemical potential of vacancies, sum of chemical potential of electrons and chemical potential of electron holes is zero at thermodynamic equilibrium. However, it is nonzero if the electron and hole concentrations are not their equilibrium values at a given thermodynamic condition, for example, the photo-excited electrons and holes in photovoltaic devices.</p><p>Of course, can be highly nonlinear with respect to .</p><p>For an inhomogeneous system with interfaces, the inhomogeneous fields <i>σ</i><sub><i>ij</i></sub>, <i>E</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>, <i>H</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> also contribute to its thermodynamics and stability. These fields can, in principle, be solved under a set of mechanical, electric, and magnetic boundary conditions, and the corresponding strain energy, electrostatic energy, magnetic energy of an inhomogeneous system can be obtained. In principle, all the microstructures and thus properties of a material can be modeled and predicted using computational methods, such as the phase-field methods. However, as mentioned above, the quantitative prediction of all the history-dependent material properties of a practical material requires the availability of kinetic mobility data on both transport and interfacial migration as well as the energetics of interfaces that are much more challenging to experimentally measure or theoretically compute. Furthermore, the properties of a material may not only be history-dependent but also dependent on size and geometry of a material and can be highly nonlinear.</p><p>This is an opinion piece to argue that the fundamental equation of thermodynamics of a material can be considered as a history-independent Materials Genome. Therefore, one of the main goals for MGI could be to develop and build the fundamental equation for a material system. One can obtain all the thermodynamic properties from such fundamental equation, or the genome of a material, and hence there is no need to have separate databases for mechanical, thermal, and dielectric properties. With the inclusion of the order parameters describing the extents of possible internal processes, a fundamental equation also contains the thermodynamic driving forces for nonequilibrium processes and can be employed to construct stable equilibrium phase diagrams. Furthermore, all the thermodynamic information about defect energetics and electronic energy density distributions can be coded into the fundamental equation of thermodynamics. In principle, all the information that is necessary to construct a fundamental equation of thermodynamics can be computationally obtained alone. The fundamental equation of thermodynamics can also be employed in theoretical models and computational studies of phase transformations and microstructure evolution. It should be emphasized that the fundamental equation of thermodynamics can only provide partial information, that is, the thermodynamic contribution, to kinetic properties, such as chemical diffusivity, and therefore, it is not sufficient to describe history-dependent properties. Purely kinetic properties and history-dependent properties are much more challenging to obtain computationally or experimentally, and hence, it may likely have to rely on a combination of experiments, computation, and machine learning of experimental and computational data.</p><p><b>Long-Qing Chen</b>: Conceptualization; writing - original draft.</p><p>There are no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":100889,"journal":{"name":"Materials Genome Engineering Advances","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mgea.13","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opinion: Chemical potential and materials genome\",\"authors\":\"Long-Qing Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mgea.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Materials Genome Initiative started almost exactly a dozen years ago in the US.<span><sup>1</sup></span> However, if one asks the question “what is materials genome?” to 100 people, it is a good bet that one would get 100 different answers. To the author's knowledge, there is still no generally agreeable definition of what materials genome is, unlike from the human genome, which has a much clearer definition.<span><sup>2</sup></span> In some way, the Materials Genome Initiative has been mainly used as a rallying slogan for advocating multiscale modeling, closed-loop integration, and iteration between computation and experiments, and more recently, the applications of data science, machine learning, and artificial intelligence to materials science and engineering.<span><sup>3, 4</sup></span> Therefore, the main purpose of this article is to offer the author's perspective on what could be considered as the materials genome.</p><p>Gibbs defined a simple system as one without interfacial, gravitational, electrical, and magnetic contributions and introduced a set of basic thermodynamic variables to describe an equilibrium state of a simple system.</p><p>An equilibrium state is defined as a state in which all the state variables no longer vary with time. However, it should be noted that an equilibrium state does not have to be a stable state; it can be stable, metastable, or unstable. An unstable equilibrium state is intrinsically unstable with respect to any small fluctuations in the state variables, whereas a metastable equilibrium state is stable against small fluctuations in state variables but unstable with respect to large fluctuations. A stable equilibrium state is stable against any fluctuations, large or small. Therefore, unstable and metastable equilibrium states can only be arrested kinetically in practice. However, we hypothesize that all states, including unstable and metastable states, can be described by the same set of basic state variables and the fundamental equation of thermodynamics.</p><p>These independent variables are called the natural variables for <i>U</i> because only when <i>U</i> is expressed as a function of its <i>n</i> + 2 natural variables, Equation (1) is a fundamental equation of thermodynamics.</p><p>Therefore, we have 2<i>n</i> + 5 total basic thermodynamic variables, which are related by <i>n</i> + 3 equations with <i>n</i> + 2 of them being equations of state (Equation 4) and one integrated fundamental equation of thermodynamics (Equation 1). Therefore, the number of independent variables, given by 2<i>n</i> + 5 − (<i>n</i> + 3) = <i>n</i> + 2, is often called the number of degrees of freedom for a system.</p><p>Here, it should be noted that <i>x</i><sub>1</sub> + <i>x</i><sub>2</sub> + … + <i>x</i><sub><i>n</i></sub> = 1; there are only <i>n</i> − 1 independent composition variables. All the thermodynamic properties of a material can be determined from the knowledge of chemical potential <i>μ</i> as a function of temperature, pressure, and chemical composition, <i>x</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>x</i><sub>2</sub>, …, and <i>x</i><sub><i>n</i></sub>. All the macroscopic thermodynamic properties derived from the fundamental equation of thermodynamics in terms of chemical potential are size-independent.</p><p>Similar to the chemical potential of vacancies, sum of chemical potential of electrons and chemical potential of electron holes is zero at thermodynamic equilibrium. However, it is nonzero if the electron and hole concentrations are not their equilibrium values at a given thermodynamic condition, for example, the photo-excited electrons and holes in photovoltaic devices.</p><p>Of course, can be highly nonlinear with respect to .</p><p>For an inhomogeneous system with interfaces, the inhomogeneous fields <i>σ</i><sub><i>ij</i></sub>, <i>E</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>, <i>H</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> also contribute to its thermodynamics and stability. These fields can, in principle, be solved under a set of mechanical, electric, and magnetic boundary conditions, and the corresponding strain energy, electrostatic energy, magnetic energy of an inhomogeneous system can be obtained. In principle, all the microstructures and thus properties of a material can be modeled and predicted using computational methods, such as the phase-field methods. However, as mentioned above, the quantitative prediction of all the history-dependent material properties of a practical material requires the availability of kinetic mobility data on both transport and interfacial migration as well as the energetics of interfaces that are much more challenging to experimentally measure or theoretically compute. Furthermore, the properties of a material may not only be history-dependent but also dependent on size and geometry of a material and can be highly nonlinear.</p><p>This is an opinion piece to argue that the fundamental equation of thermodynamics of a material can be considered as a history-independent Materials Genome. Therefore, one of the main goals for MGI could be to develop and build the fundamental equation for a material system. One can obtain all the thermodynamic properties from such fundamental equation, or the genome of a material, and hence there is no need to have separate databases for mechanical, thermal, and dielectric properties. With the inclusion of the order parameters describing the extents of possible internal processes, a fundamental equation also contains the thermodynamic driving forces for nonequilibrium processes and can be employed to construct stable equilibrium phase diagrams. Furthermore, all the thermodynamic information about defect energetics and electronic energy density distributions can be coded into the fundamental equation of thermodynamics. In principle, all the information that is necessary to construct a fundamental equation of thermodynamics can be computationally obtained alone. The fundamental equation of thermodynamics can also be employed in theoretical models and computational studies of phase transformations and microstructure evolution. It should be emphasized that the fundamental equation of thermodynamics can only provide partial information, that is, the thermodynamic contribution, to kinetic properties, such as chemical diffusivity, and therefore, it is not sufficient to describe history-dependent properties. Purely kinetic properties and history-dependent properties are much more challenging to obtain computationally or experimentally, and hence, it may likely have to rely on a combination of experiments, computation, and machine learning of experimental and computational data.</p><p><b>Long-Qing Chen</b>: Conceptualization; writing - original draft.</p><p>There are no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials Genome Engineering Advances\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mgea.13\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials Genome Engineering Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mgea.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Genome Engineering Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mgea.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

材料基因组计划(Materials Genome Initiative)几乎是在十几年前在美国启动的。然而,如果有人问“什么是材料基因组?”问100个人,一个人很可能会得到100个不同的答案。就笔者所知,材料基因组是什么,目前还没有一个普遍认同的定义,而人类基因组的定义要清晰得多在某种程度上,材料基因组计划主要被用作倡导多尺度建模、闭环集成和计算与实验之间的迭代的集结口号,以及最近数据科学、机器学习和人工智能在材料科学与工程中的应用。因此,本文的主要目的是提供作者对什么可以被认为是材料基因组的观点。根据参考文献[2],“基因组是在细胞中发现的一整套DNA指令。在人类中,基因组由位于细胞核中的23对染色体以及位于细胞线粒体中的一条小染色体组成。基因组包含了个体发育和功能所需的所有信息。”具有特定化学性质的材料的内部中尺度微观结构和特性具有强烈的历史依赖性,因此,没有相应的材料基因组,这与生物基因组是一对一的类比。然而,有可能确定一个材料基因组,从中人们可以获得具有给定化学性质的材料的所有与历史无关的内在平衡特性,也就是说,材料如何响应由热、机械、化学、电和磁条件指定的环境变化的全部知识。根据吉布斯的说法,材料的热力学基本方程包含了材料的所有热力学性质。因此,热力学的基本方程正是材料基因组,人们可以用它来获得材料在不同热力学条件下的平衡行为。吉布斯将简单系统定义为没有界面、引力、电和磁作用的系统,并引入了一组基本的热力学变量来描述简单系统的平衡状态。平衡态被定义为所有状态变量不再随时间变化的状态。然而,应该注意的是,平衡状态不一定是稳定状态;它可以是稳定的、亚稳态的或不稳定的。不稳定平衡态相对于状态变量的任何小波动本质上是不稳定的,而亚稳态平衡态相对于状态变量的小波动是稳定的,但相对于大波动是不稳定的。稳定的平衡状态对任何大或小的波动都是稳定的。因此,不稳定和亚稳平衡态只能在实践中被动力学捕获。然而,我们假设所有的状态,包括不稳定和亚稳态,都可以用相同的一组基本状态变量和热力学基本方程来描述。这些自变量被称为U的自然变量,因为只有当U表示为其n + 2个自然变量的函数时,式(1)才是热力学的基本方程。因此,我们总共有2n + 5个基本热力学变量,它们由n + 3个方程联系起来,其中n + 2个是状态方程(方程4)和一个完整的热力学基本方程(方程1)。因此,自变量的数量,由2n + 5 - (n + 3) = n + 2给出,通常被称为系统的自由度数。这里需要注意的是x1 + x2 +…+ xn = 1;只有n−1个独立的复合变量。材料的所有热力学性质都可以由化学势μ作为温度、压力和化学成分x1、x2、…和xn的函数来确定。所有由热力学基本方程以化学势形式导出的宏观热力学性质都与尺寸无关。与空位的化学势类似,在热力学平衡时,电子的化学势和电子空穴的化学势之和为零。然而,在给定的热力学条件下,如果电子和空穴浓度不是它们的平衡值,例如光伏器件中的光激发电子和空穴,则它是非零的。当然,可以是高度非线性的。对于具有界面的非齐次体系,非齐次场σij, Ei, Hi也对其热力学和稳定性有贡献。 材料基因组计划(Materials Genome Initiative)几乎是在十几年前在美国启动的。然而,如果有人问“什么是材料基因组?”问100个人,一个人很可能会得到100个不同的答案。就笔者所知,材料基因组是什么,目前还没有一个普遍认同的定义,而人类基因组的定义要清晰得多在某种程度上,材料基因组计划主要被用作倡导多尺度建模、闭环集成和计算与实验之间的迭代的集结口号,以及最近数据科学、机器学习和人工智能在材料科学与工程中的应用。因此,本文的主要目的是提供作者对什么可以被认为是材料基因组的观点。吉布斯将简单系统定义为没有界面、引力、电和磁作用的系统,并引入了一组基本的热力学变量来描述简单系统的平衡状态。平衡态被定义为所有状态变量不再随时间变化的状态。然而,应该注意的是,平衡状态不一定是稳定状态;它可以是稳定的、亚稳态的或不稳定的。不稳定平衡态相对于状态变量的任何小波动本质上是不稳定的,而亚稳态平衡态相对于状态变量的小波动是稳定的,但相对于大波动是不稳定的。稳定的平衡状态对任何大或小的波动都是稳定的。因此,不稳定和亚稳平衡态只能在实践中被动力学捕获。然而,我们假设所有的状态,包括不稳定和亚稳态,都可以用相同的一组基本状态变量和热力学基本方程来描述。这些自变量被称为U的自然变量,因为只有当U表示为其n + 2个自然变量的函数时,式(1)才是热力学的基本方程。因此,我们总共有2n + 5个基本热力学变量,它们由n + 3个方程联系起来,其中n + 2个是状态方程(方程4)和一个完整的热力学基本方程(方程1)。因此,自变量的数量,由2n + 5 - (n + 3) = n + 2给出,通常被称为系统的自由度数。在这里,需要注意的是,x1 + x2 +……+ xn = 1;只有n−1个独立的复合变量。材料的所有热力学性质都可以由化学势μ作为温度、压力和化学成分x1、x2、…和xn的函数来确定。所有由热力学基本方程以化学势形式导出的宏观热力学性质都与尺寸无关。与空位的化学势类似,在热力学平衡时,电子的化学势和电子空穴的化学势之和为零。然而,在给定的热力学条件下,如果电子和空穴浓度不是它们的平衡值,例如光伏器件中的光激发电子和空穴,则它是非零的。对于具有界面的非齐次系统,非齐次场σij, Ei, Hi也有助于其热力学和稳定性。这些场原则上可以在一组机械、电、磁边界条件下求解,得到非均匀体系对应的应变能、静电能、磁能。原则上,材料的所有微观结构和性质都可以用相场法等计算方法建模和预测。然而,如上所述,对实际材料的所有依赖于历史的材料性质的定量预测需要关于输运和界面迁移的动力学迁移率数据的可用性,以及界面的能量学,这些数据在实验测量或理论计算中更具挑战性。此外,材料的性质不仅与历史有关,还与材料的尺寸和几何形状有关,并且可能是高度非线性的。这是一篇观点文章,认为材料的热力学基本方程可以被认为是一个与历史无关的材料基因组。因此,MGI的主要目标之一可能是开发和建立材料系统的基本方程。人们可以从这样的基本方程或材料的基因组中获得所有的热力学性质,因此不需要单独的力学、热学和介电性质数据库。 由于包含了描述可能的内部过程程度的序参量,一个基本方程也包含了非平衡过程的热力学驱动力,可以用来构建稳定的平衡相图。此外,所有关于缺陷能量和电子能量密度分布的热力学信息都可以编码到热力学基本方程中。原则上,构建热力学基本方程所需的所有信息都可以单独通过计算获得。热力学基本方程也可用于相变和微观结构演化的理论模型和计算研究。需要强调的是,热力学基本方程只能提供部分信息,即热力学对动力学性质(如化学扩散率)的贡献,因此,它不足以描述与历史相关的性质。纯粹的动力学性质和依赖历史的性质在计算或实验中获得更具挑战性,因此,它可能不得不依赖于实验、计算和实验和计算数据的机器学习的结合。陈龙清:概念化;写作-原稿。没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opinion: Chemical potential and materials genome

The Materials Genome Initiative started almost exactly a dozen years ago in the US.1 However, if one asks the question “what is materials genome?” to 100 people, it is a good bet that one would get 100 different answers. To the author's knowledge, there is still no generally agreeable definition of what materials genome is, unlike from the human genome, which has a much clearer definition.2 In some way, the Materials Genome Initiative has been mainly used as a rallying slogan for advocating multiscale modeling, closed-loop integration, and iteration between computation and experiments, and more recently, the applications of data science, machine learning, and artificial intelligence to materials science and engineering.3, 4 Therefore, the main purpose of this article is to offer the author's perspective on what could be considered as the materials genome.

Gibbs defined a simple system as one without interfacial, gravitational, electrical, and magnetic contributions and introduced a set of basic thermodynamic variables to describe an equilibrium state of a simple system.

An equilibrium state is defined as a state in which all the state variables no longer vary with time. However, it should be noted that an equilibrium state does not have to be a stable state; it can be stable, metastable, or unstable. An unstable equilibrium state is intrinsically unstable with respect to any small fluctuations in the state variables, whereas a metastable equilibrium state is stable against small fluctuations in state variables but unstable with respect to large fluctuations. A stable equilibrium state is stable against any fluctuations, large or small. Therefore, unstable and metastable equilibrium states can only be arrested kinetically in practice. However, we hypothesize that all states, including unstable and metastable states, can be described by the same set of basic state variables and the fundamental equation of thermodynamics.

These independent variables are called the natural variables for U because only when U is expressed as a function of its n + 2 natural variables, Equation (1) is a fundamental equation of thermodynamics.

Therefore, we have 2n + 5 total basic thermodynamic variables, which are related by n + 3 equations with n + 2 of them being equations of state (Equation 4) and one integrated fundamental equation of thermodynamics (Equation 1). Therefore, the number of independent variables, given by 2n + 5 − (n + 3) = n + 2, is often called the number of degrees of freedom for a system.

Here, it should be noted that x1 + x2 + … + xn = 1; there are only n − 1 independent composition variables. All the thermodynamic properties of a material can be determined from the knowledge of chemical potential μ as a function of temperature, pressure, and chemical composition, x1, x2, …, and xn. All the macroscopic thermodynamic properties derived from the fundamental equation of thermodynamics in terms of chemical potential are size-independent.

Similar to the chemical potential of vacancies, sum of chemical potential of electrons and chemical potential of electron holes is zero at thermodynamic equilibrium. However, it is nonzero if the electron and hole concentrations are not their equilibrium values at a given thermodynamic condition, for example, the photo-excited electrons and holes in photovoltaic devices.

Of course, can be highly nonlinear with respect to .

For an inhomogeneous system with interfaces, the inhomogeneous fields σij, Ei, Hi also contribute to its thermodynamics and stability. These fields can, in principle, be solved under a set of mechanical, electric, and magnetic boundary conditions, and the corresponding strain energy, electrostatic energy, magnetic energy of an inhomogeneous system can be obtained. In principle, all the microstructures and thus properties of a material can be modeled and predicted using computational methods, such as the phase-field methods. However, as mentioned above, the quantitative prediction of all the history-dependent material properties of a practical material requires the availability of kinetic mobility data on both transport and interfacial migration as well as the energetics of interfaces that are much more challenging to experimentally measure or theoretically compute. Furthermore, the properties of a material may not only be history-dependent but also dependent on size and geometry of a material and can be highly nonlinear.

This is an opinion piece to argue that the fundamental equation of thermodynamics of a material can be considered as a history-independent Materials Genome. Therefore, one of the main goals for MGI could be to develop and build the fundamental equation for a material system. One can obtain all the thermodynamic properties from such fundamental equation, or the genome of a material, and hence there is no need to have separate databases for mechanical, thermal, and dielectric properties. With the inclusion of the order parameters describing the extents of possible internal processes, a fundamental equation also contains the thermodynamic driving forces for nonequilibrium processes and can be employed to construct stable equilibrium phase diagrams. Furthermore, all the thermodynamic information about defect energetics and electronic energy density distributions can be coded into the fundamental equation of thermodynamics. In principle, all the information that is necessary to construct a fundamental equation of thermodynamics can be computationally obtained alone. The fundamental equation of thermodynamics can also be employed in theoretical models and computational studies of phase transformations and microstructure evolution. It should be emphasized that the fundamental equation of thermodynamics can only provide partial information, that is, the thermodynamic contribution, to kinetic properties, such as chemical diffusivity, and therefore, it is not sufficient to describe history-dependent properties. Purely kinetic properties and history-dependent properties are much more challenging to obtain computationally or experimentally, and hence, it may likely have to rely on a combination of experiments, computation, and machine learning of experimental and computational data.

Long-Qing Chen: Conceptualization; writing - original draft.

There are no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信