应用联合四分体试验和多组时空检查法提高碳酸饮料风味的区分度

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Alex Feldmeyer, Adrianne Johnson, Danielle Van Hout
{"title":"应用联合四分体试验和多组时空检查法提高碳酸饮料风味的区分度","authors":"Alex Feldmeyer,&nbsp;Adrianne Johnson,&nbsp;Danielle Van Hout","doi":"10.1111/joss.12880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Sensory discrimination testing is conducted for many reasons, including—but not limited to—flavor matching initiatives. When conducting these tests on carbonated beverages, there is not an established protocol on the best way to differentiate these multifaceted products. This is in part due to the formulations exhibiting a spectrum of carbonation (CO<sub>2</sub>) levels, flavors and ingredients. This research conducted tetrad tests at four time points of CO<sub>2</sub> dissipation (0, 5, 10, and 15 min) and at two temperatures (refrigerated and ambient) to determine the sample preparation scenarios for which the “high discrimination” and “low discrimination” sample differentiation occurred. Subsequently, a select beverage pair was assessed in the “high discrimination” and the “low discrimination” preparation scenarios using multi-sip Temporal Check-All-That-Apply (TCATA). The objective of this research was to assess if identifying optimal sample preparations that enhanced sample differentiation from a series of tetrad tests allowed for a more discriminatory TCATA assessment. Results indicated that sample preparation significantly affected the ability to differentiate beverages for select attributes, but the “high discrimination” scenario was not always the more differentiating condition. Future work will aim to increase the knowledge of these interactions with additional carbonated products to further validate and generalize these findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practical Applications</h3>\n \n <p>Sensory professionals will gain knowledge on how to optimize sample preparation for discovery of scenarios in which carbonated product flavors might be better differentiated.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sensory Studies","volume":"38 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of combined tetrad tests and multi-sip Temporal Check-All-That-Apply to enhance carbonated beverage flavor differentiation\",\"authors\":\"Alex Feldmeyer,&nbsp;Adrianne Johnson,&nbsp;Danielle Van Hout\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joss.12880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Sensory discrimination testing is conducted for many reasons, including—but not limited to—flavor matching initiatives. When conducting these tests on carbonated beverages, there is not an established protocol on the best way to differentiate these multifaceted products. This is in part due to the formulations exhibiting a spectrum of carbonation (CO<sub>2</sub>) levels, flavors and ingredients. This research conducted tetrad tests at four time points of CO<sub>2</sub> dissipation (0, 5, 10, and 15 min) and at two temperatures (refrigerated and ambient) to determine the sample preparation scenarios for which the “high discrimination” and “low discrimination” sample differentiation occurred. Subsequently, a select beverage pair was assessed in the “high discrimination” and the “low discrimination” preparation scenarios using multi-sip Temporal Check-All-That-Apply (TCATA). The objective of this research was to assess if identifying optimal sample preparations that enhanced sample differentiation from a series of tetrad tests allowed for a more discriminatory TCATA assessment. Results indicated that sample preparation significantly affected the ability to differentiate beverages for select attributes, but the “high discrimination” scenario was not always the more differentiating condition. Future work will aim to increase the knowledge of these interactions with additional carbonated products to further validate and generalize these findings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Practical Applications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sensory professionals will gain knowledge on how to optimize sample preparation for discovery of scenarios in which carbonated product flavors might be better differentiated.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sensory Studies\",\"volume\":\"38 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sensory Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.12880\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sensory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.12880","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

进行感官鉴别测试的原因有很多,包括但不限于风味匹配计划。在对碳酸饮料进行这些测试时,对于区分这些多层面产品的最佳方法并没有既定的协议。这部分是由于这些产品的配方显示出不同的碳酸化(CO2)水平、风味和成分。这项研究在二氧化碳消散的四个时间点(0、5、10 和 15 分钟)和两种温度(冷藏和常温)下进行了四分试验,以确定 "高区分度 "和 "低区分度 "样品区分的样品制备方案。随后,在 "高辨别度 "和 "低辨别度 "的制备方案中,使用多组时空校验-全部应用(TCATA)对选定的饮料进行评估。这项研究的目的是评估从一系列四分体测试中确定最佳样品制备方法是否能提高 TCATA 评估的区分度。结果表明,样品制备对区分特定属性饮料的能力有很大影响,但 "高区分度 "方案并不总是更具区分度的条件。未来的工作将致力于通过更多的碳酸产品来增加对这些相互作用的了解,从而进一步验证和推广这些发现。 实际应用 感官专业人员将获得如何优化样品制备的知识,以发现碳酸产品风味可能更好区分的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of combined tetrad tests and multi-sip Temporal Check-All-That-Apply to enhance carbonated beverage flavor differentiation

Sensory discrimination testing is conducted for many reasons, including—but not limited to—flavor matching initiatives. When conducting these tests on carbonated beverages, there is not an established protocol on the best way to differentiate these multifaceted products. This is in part due to the formulations exhibiting a spectrum of carbonation (CO2) levels, flavors and ingredients. This research conducted tetrad tests at four time points of CO2 dissipation (0, 5, 10, and 15 min) and at two temperatures (refrigerated and ambient) to determine the sample preparation scenarios for which the “high discrimination” and “low discrimination” sample differentiation occurred. Subsequently, a select beverage pair was assessed in the “high discrimination” and the “low discrimination” preparation scenarios using multi-sip Temporal Check-All-That-Apply (TCATA). The objective of this research was to assess if identifying optimal sample preparations that enhanced sample differentiation from a series of tetrad tests allowed for a more discriminatory TCATA assessment. Results indicated that sample preparation significantly affected the ability to differentiate beverages for select attributes, but the “high discrimination” scenario was not always the more differentiating condition. Future work will aim to increase the knowledge of these interactions with additional carbonated products to further validate and generalize these findings.

Practical Applications

Sensory professionals will gain knowledge on how to optimize sample preparation for discovery of scenarios in which carbonated product flavors might be better differentiated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sensory Studies
Journal of Sensory Studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sensory Studies publishes original research and review articles, as well as expository and tutorial papers focusing on observational and experimental studies that lead to development and application of sensory and consumer (including behavior) methods to products such as food and beverage, medical, agricultural, biological, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, or other materials; information such as marketing and consumer information; or improvement of services based on sensory methods. All papers should show some advancement of sensory science in terms of methods. The journal does NOT publish papers that focus primarily on the application of standard sensory techniques to experimental variations in products unless the authors can show a unique application of sensory in an unusual way or in a new product category where sensory methods usually have not been applied.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信