私法关系体系中的行为规范

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
N.V. Zaytseva
{"title":"私法关系体系中的行为规范","authors":"N.V. Zaytseva","doi":"10.17072/1995-4190-2023-59-97-120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: the article discusses the formation of behavioral standards, ways of their implementation, and their effect on the structure of legal relations. Behavior, inextricably linked with a legal relationship participant’s psycho-emotional component, becomes the basis for the external and internal differentiation of legal relations, in which the behavioral factor is subject to legal characterization in various aspects. In the consideration of private law disputes, characterization of behavior often predetermines the emergence of special legal principles, including reasonableness, prudence, due care. Purpose: to identify the influence of behavior and subjective perception of participants in legal relations on the differentiation of legal relations as well as on their relationship with the principles of private law, to determine the points of interdependence. Methods: deduction and induction; empirical methods of comparison, interpretation, and other general scientific methods; special scientific methods: historical, comparative legal methods, system analysis. Results: the analysis of judicial practice and scientific research works showed the need to determine the nature the behavior of the participants in a legal relationship through the prism of identifying and characterizing the elements of the subjective factor. Chaotic approaches, indicating the absence of a generally recognized understanding of the priority of the principles of law, methods of assessment and a mechanism for taking into account the behavioral component as well as the forms of their influence on civil legal relations, hinder the formation of uniform judicial positions, which, in turn, significantly reduces the effectiveness of the protection of violated and contested rights of individuals and legal entities and negatively affects the stability and development of civil circulation. Conclusions: the article proposes a new approach to determining the nature of the actions of participants in civil legal relations through the prism of standards of conduct that embody the concept of ‘behavior of the good party’ (‘correct behavior’), according to which a legal rule, with the use of various methods of legal technique, forms a certain ‘correct’ (‘ideal’) model of behavior, deviation from which is considered to be a potential ground for bringing the person to responsibility. The paper shows the influence of behavioral standards on the differentiation of legal relations, identifies essential interrelations with legal principles.","PeriodicalId":42087,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BEHAVIORAL STANDARDS IN THE SYSTEM OF PRIVATE LAW RELATIONS\",\"authors\":\"N.V. Zaytseva\",\"doi\":\"10.17072/1995-4190-2023-59-97-120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: the article discusses the formation of behavioral standards, ways of their implementation, and their effect on the structure of legal relations. Behavior, inextricably linked with a legal relationship participant’s psycho-emotional component, becomes the basis for the external and internal differentiation of legal relations, in which the behavioral factor is subject to legal characterization in various aspects. In the consideration of private law disputes, characterization of behavior often predetermines the emergence of special legal principles, including reasonableness, prudence, due care. Purpose: to identify the influence of behavior and subjective perception of participants in legal relations on the differentiation of legal relations as well as on their relationship with the principles of private law, to determine the points of interdependence. Methods: deduction and induction; empirical methods of comparison, interpretation, and other general scientific methods; special scientific methods: historical, comparative legal methods, system analysis. Results: the analysis of judicial practice and scientific research works showed the need to determine the nature the behavior of the participants in a legal relationship through the prism of identifying and characterizing the elements of the subjective factor. Chaotic approaches, indicating the absence of a generally recognized understanding of the priority of the principles of law, methods of assessment and a mechanism for taking into account the behavioral component as well as the forms of their influence on civil legal relations, hinder the formation of uniform judicial positions, which, in turn, significantly reduces the effectiveness of the protection of violated and contested rights of individuals and legal entities and negatively affects the stability and development of civil circulation. Conclusions: the article proposes a new approach to determining the nature of the actions of participants in civil legal relations through the prism of standards of conduct that embody the concept of ‘behavior of the good party’ (‘correct behavior’), according to which a legal rule, with the use of various methods of legal technique, forms a certain ‘correct’ (‘ideal’) model of behavior, deviation from which is considered to be a potential ground for bringing the person to responsibility. The paper shows the influence of behavioral standards on the differentiation of legal relations, identifies essential interrelations with legal principles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2023-59-97-120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2023-59-97-120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绪论:论述了行为规范的形成、实施方式及其对法律关系结构的影响。行为与法律关系参与者的心理情感成分有着千丝万缕的联系,成为法律关系外部和内部分化的基础,行为因素在法律关系中受到多方面的法律定性。在考虑私法纠纷时,对行为的定性往往预先决定了特殊法律原则的出现,包括合理、谨慎、应有注意等。目的:确定法律关系参与者的行为和主观感知对法律关系的分化及其与私法原则的关系的影响,确定相互依存的点。方法:演绎归纳法;比较、解释和其他一般科学方法的经验方法;特殊的科学方法:历史学、比较法、系统分析法。结果:对司法实践和科研工作的分析表明,需要通过识别和表征主观因素要素的棱镜来确定法律关系中参与者的行为性质。混乱的做法表明对法律原则的优先次序、评估方法和考虑行为组成部分及其对民事法律关系的影响形式的机制缺乏普遍公认的理解,从而阻碍了统一司法立场的形成,而统一司法立场反过来又阻碍了司法立场的形成。大大降低了保护个人和法人实体受到侵犯和有争议的权利的有效性,并对民事流通的稳定和发展产生负面影响。结论:本文提出了一种新的方法,通过体现“好方行为”(“正确行为”)概念的行为标准的棱镜来确定民事法律关系参与者的行为性质,根据这种标准,法律规则使用各种法律技术方法,形成某种“正确”(“理想”)的行为模式,偏离这种模式被认为是使人承担责任的潜在理由。本文论述了行为规范对法律关系分化的影响,辨析了行为规范与法律原则之间的本质联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BEHAVIORAL STANDARDS IN THE SYSTEM OF PRIVATE LAW RELATIONS
Introduction: the article discusses the formation of behavioral standards, ways of their implementation, and their effect on the structure of legal relations. Behavior, inextricably linked with a legal relationship participant’s psycho-emotional component, becomes the basis for the external and internal differentiation of legal relations, in which the behavioral factor is subject to legal characterization in various aspects. In the consideration of private law disputes, characterization of behavior often predetermines the emergence of special legal principles, including reasonableness, prudence, due care. Purpose: to identify the influence of behavior and subjective perception of participants in legal relations on the differentiation of legal relations as well as on their relationship with the principles of private law, to determine the points of interdependence. Methods: deduction and induction; empirical methods of comparison, interpretation, and other general scientific methods; special scientific methods: historical, comparative legal methods, system analysis. Results: the analysis of judicial practice and scientific research works showed the need to determine the nature the behavior of the participants in a legal relationship through the prism of identifying and characterizing the elements of the subjective factor. Chaotic approaches, indicating the absence of a generally recognized understanding of the priority of the principles of law, methods of assessment and a mechanism for taking into account the behavioral component as well as the forms of their influence on civil legal relations, hinder the formation of uniform judicial positions, which, in turn, significantly reduces the effectiveness of the protection of violated and contested rights of individuals and legal entities and negatively affects the stability and development of civil circulation. Conclusions: the article proposes a new approach to determining the nature of the actions of participants in civil legal relations through the prism of standards of conduct that embody the concept of ‘behavior of the good party’ (‘correct behavior’), according to which a legal rule, with the use of various methods of legal technique, forms a certain ‘correct’ (‘ideal’) model of behavior, deviation from which is considered to be a potential ground for bringing the person to responsibility. The paper shows the influence of behavioral standards on the differentiation of legal relations, identifies essential interrelations with legal principles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信