使用世界卫生组织指标评估三级护理医院抗菌药物使用模式:一项横断面研究

IF 0.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Swathi Acharya, Nandana Sharma, VenkateshKrishna Mohan
{"title":"使用世界卫生组织指标评估三级护理医院抗菌药物使用模式:一项横断面研究","authors":"Swathi Acharya, Nandana Sharma, VenkateshKrishna Mohan","doi":"10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_74_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of the study was to analyze the antimicrobial utilization pattern using the World Health Organization (WHO) indicators with the ultimate goal of ensuring rational drug use to evaluate the policies and procedures in the hospital for the appropriate use of antimicrobials using hospital indicators and prescribing indicators. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in the southern part of India, where data from the pharmacy section and 125 patient records each from general medicine, surgery, and intensive care unit patients were taken. Antimicrobials’ prescription and utilization patterns in tertiary care were analyzed using the WHO hospital and prescribing indicators. Results: The hospital indicators were up to the expected level of the WHO standards with standard treatment guidelines (STGs), hospital formulary, and the critical list of antimicrobials available on the assessment day. None of the antibiotics were out of stock during the study period. Around 55.4% of admitted patients were prescribed antibiotics in the prescribing indicators, with the average number of antibiotics per patient being 1.591. With almost 99.7% of antibiotics are prescribed from the hospital formulary list and around 3003.7 INR as the average cost per hospitalization. The average duration of treatment was 4.96 days, with 74.3% of pneumonia patients treated according to the STG. The antimicrobials prescribed with the generic name were only 17.58%. Conclusions: The prescribing pattern of antimicrobial agents in our study site was satisfactory in hospital indicators but less than optimal in a few prescribing indicators, indicating the need for the root cause analysis for less than optimum results.","PeriodicalId":8534,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of antimicrobial utilization pattern using World Health Organization indicators in a tertiary care hospital: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Swathi Acharya, Nandana Sharma, VenkateshKrishna Mohan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_74_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The aim of the study was to analyze the antimicrobial utilization pattern using the World Health Organization (WHO) indicators with the ultimate goal of ensuring rational drug use to evaluate the policies and procedures in the hospital for the appropriate use of antimicrobials using hospital indicators and prescribing indicators. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in the southern part of India, where data from the pharmacy section and 125 patient records each from general medicine, surgery, and intensive care unit patients were taken. Antimicrobials’ prescription and utilization patterns in tertiary care were analyzed using the WHO hospital and prescribing indicators. Results: The hospital indicators were up to the expected level of the WHO standards with standard treatment guidelines (STGs), hospital formulary, and the critical list of antimicrobials available on the assessment day. None of the antibiotics were out of stock during the study period. Around 55.4% of admitted patients were prescribed antibiotics in the prescribing indicators, with the average number of antibiotics per patient being 1.591. With almost 99.7% of antibiotics are prescribed from the hospital formulary list and around 3003.7 INR as the average cost per hospitalization. The average duration of treatment was 4.96 days, with 74.3% of pneumonia patients treated according to the STG. The antimicrobials prescribed with the generic name were only 17.58%. Conclusions: The prescribing pattern of antimicrobial agents in our study site was satisfactory in hospital indicators but less than optimal in a few prescribing indicators, indicating the need for the root cause analysis for less than optimum results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_74_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_74_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是利用世界卫生组织(WHO)指标分析抗菌药物的使用模式,最终目的是确保合理用药,利用医院指标和处方指标评估医院合理使用抗菌药物的政策和程序。材料和方法:在印度南部的一家三级医院进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究,收集了来自药房的数据和125份来自普通内科、外科和重症监护病房的患者记录。使用世卫组织医院和处方指标分析三级保健抗菌素的处方和使用模式。结果:医院各项指标均达到世卫组织标准的预期水平,包括标准治疗指南(STGs)、医院处方集和评估日可获得的关键抗微生物药物清单。在研究期间,没有一种抗生素缺货。在处方指标中,约55.4%的住院患者使用了抗生素,平均每人使用了1.591种抗生素。几乎99.7%的抗生素是从医院处方清单上开出的,每次住院的平均费用约为3003.7印度卢比。平均治疗时间为4.96天,74.3%的肺炎患者按照STG治疗,使用通用名的抗菌药物仅占17.58%。结论:本区抗菌药物的处方模式在医院指标上较为满意,但在少数指标上不够理想,结果不够理想需要进行根本原因分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of antimicrobial utilization pattern using World Health Organization indicators in a tertiary care hospital: A cross-sectional study
Objectives: The aim of the study was to analyze the antimicrobial utilization pattern using the World Health Organization (WHO) indicators with the ultimate goal of ensuring rational drug use to evaluate the policies and procedures in the hospital for the appropriate use of antimicrobials using hospital indicators and prescribing indicators. Materials and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in the southern part of India, where data from the pharmacy section and 125 patient records each from general medicine, surgery, and intensive care unit patients were taken. Antimicrobials’ prescription and utilization patterns in tertiary care were analyzed using the WHO hospital and prescribing indicators. Results: The hospital indicators were up to the expected level of the WHO standards with standard treatment guidelines (STGs), hospital formulary, and the critical list of antimicrobials available on the assessment day. None of the antibiotics were out of stock during the study period. Around 55.4% of admitted patients were prescribed antibiotics in the prescribing indicators, with the average number of antibiotics per patient being 1.591. With almost 99.7% of antibiotics are prescribed from the hospital formulary list and around 3003.7 INR as the average cost per hospitalization. The average duration of treatment was 4.96 days, with 74.3% of pneumonia patients treated according to the STG. The antimicrobials prescribed with the generic name were only 17.58%. Conclusions: The prescribing pattern of antimicrobial agents in our study site was satisfactory in hospital indicators but less than optimal in a few prescribing indicators, indicating the need for the root cause analysis for less than optimum results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信