印尼反对自由主义穆斯林的良性辩论

Akhmad Rofii Damyati, Shohebul Hajad
{"title":"印尼反对自由主义穆斯林的良性辩论","authors":"Akhmad Rofii Damyati, Shohebul Hajad","doi":"10.54625/elfurqania.v9i2.7031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to different worldviews on knowledge, various parties often debate each other. In Indonesia, anti-mainstream groups often appear to challenge a common thought in Islam, whether religious, scientific, political, or philosophical. Liberal Islam is one of the prototypes that engage in debate in all sectors of already established thought in society, especially in Islamic issues, even fundamental issues such as faith. Due to its anti-mainstream nature, the emergence of Liberal Islam has drawn controversy and debate, especially among Liberalists from the West who brought ideas of freedom of thought. Some confronted their ideas with lengthy debates but often ended in protracted animosity. It is because the method of debate used tends not to consider the adab of arguing as taught by Islamic intellectuals. Yet, attempts at confrontation with them by taking a wiser path have been carried out by some activists of Islamic thought. Among them is INSISTS Jakarta, a research and publishing institution that has confronted the Liberal Islam discourse since the 2000s, not by way of confrontation but by counterarguments through scientific publications and seminars. This article will reveal the virtuous debate that has been carried out by these scientific institutions.","PeriodicalId":53372,"journal":{"name":"Miqot Jurnal Ilmuilmu Keislaman","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtuous Debate Against Liberalist Muslims in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Akhmad Rofii Damyati, Shohebul Hajad\",\"doi\":\"10.54625/elfurqania.v9i2.7031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to different worldviews on knowledge, various parties often debate each other. In Indonesia, anti-mainstream groups often appear to challenge a common thought in Islam, whether religious, scientific, political, or philosophical. Liberal Islam is one of the prototypes that engage in debate in all sectors of already established thought in society, especially in Islamic issues, even fundamental issues such as faith. Due to its anti-mainstream nature, the emergence of Liberal Islam has drawn controversy and debate, especially among Liberalists from the West who brought ideas of freedom of thought. Some confronted their ideas with lengthy debates but often ended in protracted animosity. It is because the method of debate used tends not to consider the adab of arguing as taught by Islamic intellectuals. Yet, attempts at confrontation with them by taking a wiser path have been carried out by some activists of Islamic thought. Among them is INSISTS Jakarta, a research and publishing institution that has confronted the Liberal Islam discourse since the 2000s, not by way of confrontation but by counterarguments through scientific publications and seminars. This article will reveal the virtuous debate that has been carried out by these scientific institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Miqot Jurnal Ilmuilmu Keislaman\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Miqot Jurnal Ilmuilmu Keislaman\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54625/elfurqania.v9i2.7031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Miqot Jurnal Ilmuilmu Keislaman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54625/elfurqania.v9i2.7031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于对知识的世界观不同,各方经常争论不休。在印度尼西亚,反主流团体经常挑战伊斯兰教的共同思想,无论是宗教的、科学的、政治的还是哲学的。自由主义伊斯兰教是一种原型,它参与社会上所有已确立的思想领域的辩论,特别是在伊斯兰问题上,甚至是信仰等基本问题上。由于其反主流的性质,自由主义伊斯兰教的出现引起了争议和争论,特别是在西方自由主义者中,他们带来了思想自由的理念。一些人对自己的观点进行了长时间的辩论,但往往以旷日持久的敌意告终。这是因为所使用的辩论方法往往不考虑伊斯兰知识分子所教导的辩论技巧。然而,一些伊斯兰思想的积极分子试图通过采取更明智的道路来对抗他们。研究和出版机构“坚持雅加达”(坚持雅加达)就是其中之一,自2000年代以来,它一直在与自由派伊斯兰话语对抗,不是通过对抗的方式,而是通过科学出版物和研讨会进行反驳。本文将揭示这些科研机构进行的良性辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtuous Debate Against Liberalist Muslims in Indonesia
Due to different worldviews on knowledge, various parties often debate each other. In Indonesia, anti-mainstream groups often appear to challenge a common thought in Islam, whether religious, scientific, political, or philosophical. Liberal Islam is one of the prototypes that engage in debate in all sectors of already established thought in society, especially in Islamic issues, even fundamental issues such as faith. Due to its anti-mainstream nature, the emergence of Liberal Islam has drawn controversy and debate, especially among Liberalists from the West who brought ideas of freedom of thought. Some confronted their ideas with lengthy debates but often ended in protracted animosity. It is because the method of debate used tends not to consider the adab of arguing as taught by Islamic intellectuals. Yet, attempts at confrontation with them by taking a wiser path have been carried out by some activists of Islamic thought. Among them is INSISTS Jakarta, a research and publishing institution that has confronted the Liberal Islam discourse since the 2000s, not by way of confrontation but by counterarguments through scientific publications and seminars. This article will reveal the virtuous debate that has been carried out by these scientific institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信