Dania Abid, Jun Chu, Sarfaraz Hasni, Zerai Manna, Syed Ali Abbas Naqvi
{"title":"促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者卵巢保护中的作用[j]","authors":"Dania Abid, Jun Chu, Sarfaraz Hasni, Zerai Manna, Syed Ali Abbas Naqvi","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000929868.28817.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) female patients with severe disease manifestations are treated with cyclophosphamide (CYC), which causes ovarian cytotoxicity. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is often co-administered with CYC to preserve ovarian function and reproductive potential. However, there is a lack of evidence to support this use of GnRH-a. We conducted a retrospective study and questionnaire of SLE patients who received CYC with or without GnRH-a to evaluate its efficacy in preserving ovarian function. METHODS: This study was approved by the IRB of the National Institutes of Health (IRB#:001011). Review of medical records resulted in 50 female SLE patients treated with CYC who were less than 40 year old at the time of treatment: CYC only (n=20, group 1), CYC and GnRH-a (n=30, group 2). These patients were age/gender-matched with 50 SLE patients not treated with CYC (group 3). Data about demographics, SLE disease activity, damage accrual, cumulative CYC exposure, and pregnancy outcomes were collected by chart review. Self-reported questionnaires were used to collect data assessing menses cycles, pregnancies and their outcome, or infertility. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in SLE disease activity, baseline demographics, total damage accrual, or other clinical parameters between groups 1 and 2. The mean cumulative CYC dose was 1.2 g (group 1) and 1.5 g (group 2) ( P =.16). Number of pregnancies were similar: mean (SD) group 1=2 (1.6); group 2=1.2 (1.4); group 3=1.3 (1.4) ( P =.18). There were more miscarriages in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 ( P =.015). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest use of GnRH-a improves pregnancy outcomes in SLE patients on CYC, but prospective studies are needed to establish its safety and efficacy.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRH-a) in Ovarian Preservation in Females With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Receiving Cyclophosphamide (CYC) [ID: 1375370]\",\"authors\":\"Dania Abid, Jun Chu, Sarfaraz Hasni, Zerai Manna, Syed Ali Abbas Naqvi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.aog.0000929868.28817.78\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) female patients with severe disease manifestations are treated with cyclophosphamide (CYC), which causes ovarian cytotoxicity. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is often co-administered with CYC to preserve ovarian function and reproductive potential. However, there is a lack of evidence to support this use of GnRH-a. We conducted a retrospective study and questionnaire of SLE patients who received CYC with or without GnRH-a to evaluate its efficacy in preserving ovarian function. METHODS: This study was approved by the IRB of the National Institutes of Health (IRB#:001011). Review of medical records resulted in 50 female SLE patients treated with CYC who were less than 40 year old at the time of treatment: CYC only (n=20, group 1), CYC and GnRH-a (n=30, group 2). These patients were age/gender-matched with 50 SLE patients not treated with CYC (group 3). Data about demographics, SLE disease activity, damage accrual, cumulative CYC exposure, and pregnancy outcomes were collected by chart review. Self-reported questionnaires were used to collect data assessing menses cycles, pregnancies and their outcome, or infertility. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in SLE disease activity, baseline demographics, total damage accrual, or other clinical parameters between groups 1 and 2. The mean cumulative CYC dose was 1.2 g (group 1) and 1.5 g (group 2) ( P =.16). Number of pregnancies were similar: mean (SD) group 1=2 (1.6); group 2=1.2 (1.4); group 3=1.3 (1.4) ( P =.18). There were more miscarriages in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 ( P =.015). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest use of GnRH-a improves pregnancy outcomes in SLE patients on CYC, but prospective studies are needed to establish its safety and efficacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000929868.28817.78\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000929868.28817.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRH-a) in Ovarian Preservation in Females With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Receiving Cyclophosphamide (CYC) [ID: 1375370]
INTRODUCTION: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) female patients with severe disease manifestations are treated with cyclophosphamide (CYC), which causes ovarian cytotoxicity. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is often co-administered with CYC to preserve ovarian function and reproductive potential. However, there is a lack of evidence to support this use of GnRH-a. We conducted a retrospective study and questionnaire of SLE patients who received CYC with or without GnRH-a to evaluate its efficacy in preserving ovarian function. METHODS: This study was approved by the IRB of the National Institutes of Health (IRB#:001011). Review of medical records resulted in 50 female SLE patients treated with CYC who were less than 40 year old at the time of treatment: CYC only (n=20, group 1), CYC and GnRH-a (n=30, group 2). These patients were age/gender-matched with 50 SLE patients not treated with CYC (group 3). Data about demographics, SLE disease activity, damage accrual, cumulative CYC exposure, and pregnancy outcomes were collected by chart review. Self-reported questionnaires were used to collect data assessing menses cycles, pregnancies and their outcome, or infertility. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in SLE disease activity, baseline demographics, total damage accrual, or other clinical parameters between groups 1 and 2. The mean cumulative CYC dose was 1.2 g (group 1) and 1.5 g (group 2) ( P =.16). Number of pregnancies were similar: mean (SD) group 1=2 (1.6); group 2=1.2 (1.4); group 3=1.3 (1.4) ( P =.18). There were more miscarriages in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 ( P =.015). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest use of GnRH-a improves pregnancy outcomes in SLE patients on CYC, but prospective studies are needed to establish its safety and efficacy.