基于适应症的宫颈环扎术不良妊娠结局[ID: 1363547]

Tetsuya Kawakita, Lea Nehme
{"title":"基于适应症的宫颈环扎术不良妊娠结局[ID: 1363547]","authors":"Tetsuya Kawakita, Lea Nehme","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000931020.06793.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to examine pregnancy outcomes of patients who underwent cervical cerclage according to cerclage indications. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with a singleton pregnancy who underwent cervical cerclage from 2014 to 2020 at a single academic institution. Patients were categorized according to cervical cerclage indications (history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated [cervical length 1–2.4 cm versus less than 1 cm], and physical exam indicated cerclage). Our primary outcome was spontaneous preterm delivery before 37 weeks of gestation. Outcomes were compared according to cervical cerclage indications. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CI, adjusting for a history of preterm delivery. Our IRB approved this analysis. RESULTS: Of 501 patients, 240 (47.9%), 115 (23.0%), 50 (10.0%), and 96 (19.2%) had a history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated (1–2.4 cm), ultrasound-indicated (<1 cm), and physical exam-indicated cerclage, respectively. Rates of preterm delivery were statistically different according to the indications. Compared to history-indicated cerclage, physical exam-indicated cerclage was associated with spontaneous preterm delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.97, 95% CI 2.27–6.97), preterm delivery (aOR 3.48, 95% CI 2.23–5.96), spontaneous preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR 5.60, 95% CI 2.92–10.74), and neonatal demise or stillbirth (aOR 3.18, 95% CI 1.35–7.50). Compared to history-indicated cerclage, ultrasound-indicated cerclage (1–2.4 cm) was associated with preterm delivery (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.07–2.72) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.11–2.96). Compared to history-indicated cerclage, ultrasound-indicated cerclage (<1 cm) was associated with spontaneous preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR 2.46, 95% CI 1.02–5.94) and NICU admission (aOR 2.51, 95% CI 1.23–3.36). CONCLUSION: Compared to history-indicated cerclage, other cerclage indications were associated with increased odds of adverse pregnancy outcomes.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes of Cervical Cerclage According to the Indications [ID: 1363547]\",\"authors\":\"Tetsuya Kawakita, Lea Nehme\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.aog.0000931020.06793.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to examine pregnancy outcomes of patients who underwent cervical cerclage according to cerclage indications. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with a singleton pregnancy who underwent cervical cerclage from 2014 to 2020 at a single academic institution. Patients were categorized according to cervical cerclage indications (history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated [cervical length 1–2.4 cm versus less than 1 cm], and physical exam indicated cerclage). Our primary outcome was spontaneous preterm delivery before 37 weeks of gestation. Outcomes were compared according to cervical cerclage indications. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CI, adjusting for a history of preterm delivery. Our IRB approved this analysis. RESULTS: Of 501 patients, 240 (47.9%), 115 (23.0%), 50 (10.0%), and 96 (19.2%) had a history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated (1–2.4 cm), ultrasound-indicated (<1 cm), and physical exam-indicated cerclage, respectively. Rates of preterm delivery were statistically different according to the indications. Compared to history-indicated cerclage, physical exam-indicated cerclage was associated with spontaneous preterm delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.97, 95% CI 2.27–6.97), preterm delivery (aOR 3.48, 95% CI 2.23–5.96), spontaneous preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR 5.60, 95% CI 2.92–10.74), and neonatal demise or stillbirth (aOR 3.18, 95% CI 1.35–7.50). Compared to history-indicated cerclage, ultrasound-indicated cerclage (1–2.4 cm) was associated with preterm delivery (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.07–2.72) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.11–2.96). Compared to history-indicated cerclage, ultrasound-indicated cerclage (<1 cm) was associated with spontaneous preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR 2.46, 95% CI 1.02–5.94) and NICU admission (aOR 2.51, 95% CI 1.23–3.36). CONCLUSION: Compared to history-indicated cerclage, other cerclage indications were associated with increased odds of adverse pregnancy outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000931020.06793.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000931020.06793.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究的目的是根据宫颈环切适应症检查接受宫颈环切术的患者的妊娠结局。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2014年至2020年在单一学术机构接受宫颈环切术的单胎妊娠患者。根据宫颈环切指征(病史指征、超声指征[宫颈长度1 - 2.4 cm vs小于1 cm]、体格检查指征)对患者进行分类。我们的主要结局是妊娠37周前的自然早产。根据宫颈环切适应症对结果进行比较。采用多变量logistic回归模型计算调整后的优势比(aORs)和95% CI,并对早产史进行调整。我们的IRB批准了这个分析。结果:501例患者中,240例(47.9%)、115例(23.0%)、50例(10.0%)和96例(19.2%)分别有病史、超声指示(1 ~ 2.4 cm)、超声指示(1 ~ 1cm)和体格检查指示的环切。早产率根据适应症有统计学差异。与病史指示的环裂相比,体格检查指示的环裂与自发性早产(调整优势比[aOR] 3.97, 95% CI 2.27-6.97)、早产(aOR 3.48, 95% CI 2.23-5.96)、自发性早产小于34周(aOR 5.60, 95% CI 2.92-10.74)、新生儿死亡或死胎(aOR 3.18, 95% CI 1.35-7.50)相关。与病史指征环切术相比,超声指征环切术(1-2.4 cm)与早产(aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.07-2.72)和新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院(aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.11-2.96)相关。与病史指示的环裂相比,超声指示的环裂(1cm)与自发性早产小于34周(aOR 2.46, 95% CI 1.02-5.94)和NICU入院(aOR 2.51, 95% CI 1.23-3.36)相关。结论:与病史指征相比较,其他指征与不良妊娠结局的几率增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes of Cervical Cerclage According to the Indications [ID: 1363547]
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to examine pregnancy outcomes of patients who underwent cervical cerclage according to cerclage indications. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with a singleton pregnancy who underwent cervical cerclage from 2014 to 2020 at a single academic institution. Patients were categorized according to cervical cerclage indications (history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated [cervical length 1–2.4 cm versus less than 1 cm], and physical exam indicated cerclage). Our primary outcome was spontaneous preterm delivery before 37 weeks of gestation. Outcomes were compared according to cervical cerclage indications. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CI, adjusting for a history of preterm delivery. Our IRB approved this analysis. RESULTS: Of 501 patients, 240 (47.9%), 115 (23.0%), 50 (10.0%), and 96 (19.2%) had a history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated (1–2.4 cm), ultrasound-indicated (<1 cm), and physical exam-indicated cerclage, respectively. Rates of preterm delivery were statistically different according to the indications. Compared to history-indicated cerclage, physical exam-indicated cerclage was associated with spontaneous preterm delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.97, 95% CI 2.27–6.97), preterm delivery (aOR 3.48, 95% CI 2.23–5.96), spontaneous preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR 5.60, 95% CI 2.92–10.74), and neonatal demise or stillbirth (aOR 3.18, 95% CI 1.35–7.50). Compared to history-indicated cerclage, ultrasound-indicated cerclage (1–2.4 cm) was associated with preterm delivery (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.07–2.72) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.11–2.96). Compared to history-indicated cerclage, ultrasound-indicated cerclage (<1 cm) was associated with spontaneous preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR 2.46, 95% CI 1.02–5.94) and NICU admission (aOR 2.51, 95% CI 1.23–3.36). CONCLUSION: Compared to history-indicated cerclage, other cerclage indications were associated with increased odds of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信