抗生素对存活前膜破裂时间给药潜伏期的影响[j]

Katherine Lambert, Jennifer Cate, Sarah Dotters-Katz, Matthew Grace, Anne West Honart
{"title":"抗生素对存活前膜破裂时间给药潜伏期的影响[j]","authors":"Katherine Lambert, Jennifer Cate, Sarah Dotters-Katz, Matthew Grace, Anne West Honart","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000930916.29468.5a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Antibiotics administered when membranes rupture (ROM) after viability increase latency to delivery. This may also be true in previable prelabor preterm rupture of membranes (pPPROM). This study assesses the effect of prophylactic antibiotics on latency in individuals with pPPROM. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of pregnancies with pPPROM less than 23 weeks 0 days in a single health system (2013–2022). Patients opting for termination or with contraindication to expectant management were excluded. Prophylactic antibiotic administration (48 hours IV azithromycin/ampicillin followed by 5 days oral amoxicillin) was at clinician discretion. The primary outcome was latency (weeks) from diagnosed pPPROM to delivery. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Bivariate statistics compared patients who did and did not receive antibiotics. Kaplan-Meier/Cox proportional hazards ratio using significant covariates ( P <.1) in bivariate analysis models antibiotic effect on latency. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients had pPPROM; 46 (49%) met inclusion criteria. Thirty-four (74%) received prophylactic antibiotics. Median gestational age (GA) at ROM trended later among those who received antibiotics (22.0 weeks [20.6, 22.4] versus 20.9 weeks [19.6, 21.7], P =.09). Median latency (interquartile range) did not differ with antibiotic receipt (1 week [0.4, 2.6] versus 0.6 weeks [0.3, 0.9], P =.27). When adjusted for GA at ROM, antibiotics were not associated with longer latency (hazard ratio 1.33 [0.91, 1.93]). Antibiotic receipt was associated with lower rates of previable delivery (23.0 weeks [22.7, 24.0] versus 21.3 weeks [20.5, 23.1], P =.006). After controlling for GA at ROM, adjusted odds of previable delivery remained lower with receipt of antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio 0.20 [0.04, 0.90]). CONCLUSION: Antibiotics at the time of pPPROM were not associated with longer latency but, after controlling for confounders, did increase the odds of delivering after viability. Further study should address optimal antibiotics strategies for this unique population.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Antibiotics on Latency When Given at the Time of Membrane Rupture Prior to Viability [ID: 1357946]\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Lambert, Jennifer Cate, Sarah Dotters-Katz, Matthew Grace, Anne West Honart\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.aog.0000930916.29468.5a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Antibiotics administered when membranes rupture (ROM) after viability increase latency to delivery. This may also be true in previable prelabor preterm rupture of membranes (pPPROM). This study assesses the effect of prophylactic antibiotics on latency in individuals with pPPROM. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of pregnancies with pPPROM less than 23 weeks 0 days in a single health system (2013–2022). Patients opting for termination or with contraindication to expectant management were excluded. Prophylactic antibiotic administration (48 hours IV azithromycin/ampicillin followed by 5 days oral amoxicillin) was at clinician discretion. The primary outcome was latency (weeks) from diagnosed pPPROM to delivery. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Bivariate statistics compared patients who did and did not receive antibiotics. Kaplan-Meier/Cox proportional hazards ratio using significant covariates ( P <.1) in bivariate analysis models antibiotic effect on latency. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients had pPPROM; 46 (49%) met inclusion criteria. Thirty-four (74%) received prophylactic antibiotics. Median gestational age (GA) at ROM trended later among those who received antibiotics (22.0 weeks [20.6, 22.4] versus 20.9 weeks [19.6, 21.7], P =.09). Median latency (interquartile range) did not differ with antibiotic receipt (1 week [0.4, 2.6] versus 0.6 weeks [0.3, 0.9], P =.27). When adjusted for GA at ROM, antibiotics were not associated with longer latency (hazard ratio 1.33 [0.91, 1.93]). Antibiotic receipt was associated with lower rates of previable delivery (23.0 weeks [22.7, 24.0] versus 21.3 weeks [20.5, 23.1], P =.006). After controlling for GA at ROM, adjusted odds of previable delivery remained lower with receipt of antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio 0.20 [0.04, 0.90]). CONCLUSION: Antibiotics at the time of pPPROM were not associated with longer latency but, after controlling for confounders, did increase the odds of delivering after viability. Further study should address optimal antibiotics strategies for this unique population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930916.29468.5a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930916.29468.5a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:当生存膜破裂(ROM)时使用抗生素会增加分娩的潜伏期。这可能也适用于产前胎膜早破(pPPROM)。本研究评估预防性抗生素对pPPROM患者潜伏期的影响。方法:在单一卫生系统(2013-2022年)对pPPROM少于23周0天的妊娠进行回顾性队列研究。排除了选择终止妊娠或有保守治疗禁忌的患者。预防性抗生素给药(48小时静脉注射阿奇霉素/氨苄西林,随后5天口服阿莫西林)由临床医生自行决定。主要终点是从诊断pPPROM到分娩的潜伏期(周)。次要结局包括孕产妇和新生儿发病率和死亡率。双变量统计比较了接受和未接受抗生素治疗的患者。Kaplan-Meier/Cox比例风险比在双变量分析中使用显著协变量(P < 1)模型抗生素对潜伏期的影响。结果:93例患者发生pPPROM;46例(49%)符合纳入标准。34例(74%)接受预防性抗生素治疗。抗生素组ROM的中位胎龄(GA)趋势较晚(22.0周[20.6,22.4]对20.9周[19.6,21.7],P = 0.09)。中位潜伏期(四分位数范围)与抗生素使用没有差异(1周[0.4,2.6]vs . 0.6周[0.3,0.9],P = 0.27)。经ROM GA校正后,抗生素与更长的潜伏期无关(风险比1.33[0.91,1.93])。抗生素使用与较低的预产率相关(23.0周[22.7,24.0]vs . 21.3周[20.5,23.1],P = 0.006)。在ROM控制GA后,预先分娩的调整优势比仍然低于抗生素的使用(调整优势比0.20[0.04,0.90])。结论:pPPROM时的抗生素与更长的潜伏期无关,但在控制混杂因素后,确实增加了生存后分娩的几率。进一步的研究应该针对这一独特的人群提出最佳的抗生素策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Antibiotics on Latency When Given at the Time of Membrane Rupture Prior to Viability [ID: 1357946]
INTRODUCTION: Antibiotics administered when membranes rupture (ROM) after viability increase latency to delivery. This may also be true in previable prelabor preterm rupture of membranes (pPPROM). This study assesses the effect of prophylactic antibiotics on latency in individuals with pPPROM. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of pregnancies with pPPROM less than 23 weeks 0 days in a single health system (2013–2022). Patients opting for termination or with contraindication to expectant management were excluded. Prophylactic antibiotic administration (48 hours IV azithromycin/ampicillin followed by 5 days oral amoxicillin) was at clinician discretion. The primary outcome was latency (weeks) from diagnosed pPPROM to delivery. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Bivariate statistics compared patients who did and did not receive antibiotics. Kaplan-Meier/Cox proportional hazards ratio using significant covariates ( P <.1) in bivariate analysis models antibiotic effect on latency. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients had pPPROM; 46 (49%) met inclusion criteria. Thirty-four (74%) received prophylactic antibiotics. Median gestational age (GA) at ROM trended later among those who received antibiotics (22.0 weeks [20.6, 22.4] versus 20.9 weeks [19.6, 21.7], P =.09). Median latency (interquartile range) did not differ with antibiotic receipt (1 week [0.4, 2.6] versus 0.6 weeks [0.3, 0.9], P =.27). When adjusted for GA at ROM, antibiotics were not associated with longer latency (hazard ratio 1.33 [0.91, 1.93]). Antibiotic receipt was associated with lower rates of previable delivery (23.0 weeks [22.7, 24.0] versus 21.3 weeks [20.5, 23.1], P =.006). After controlling for GA at ROM, adjusted odds of previable delivery remained lower with receipt of antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio 0.20 [0.04, 0.90]). CONCLUSION: Antibiotics at the time of pPPROM were not associated with longer latency but, after controlling for confounders, did increase the odds of delivering after viability. Further study should address optimal antibiotics strategies for this unique population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信