改变的理由:审查《残疾人歧视法》

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Graeme Innes, Natalie Wade
{"title":"改变的理由:审查《残疾人歧视法》","authors":"Graeme Innes, Natalie Wade","doi":"10.1177/1037969x231206831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article pays respect to the role of the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) in revolutionising the rights of people with disabilities in Australia but makes the case for law reform of this landmark legislation. In analysing the successes and failures of the DDA, we provide a clear roadmap to reform the DDA toward a modern realisation of disability rights in Australia.","PeriodicalId":44595,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The case for change: Reviewing the <i>Disability Discrimination Act</i>\",\"authors\":\"Graeme Innes, Natalie Wade\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1037969x231206831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article pays respect to the role of the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) in revolutionising the rights of people with disabilities in Australia but makes the case for law reform of this landmark legislation. In analysing the successes and failures of the DDA, we provide a clear roadmap to reform the DDA toward a modern realisation of disability rights in Australia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x231206831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x231206831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文尊重《残疾歧视法》(DDA)在彻底改变澳大利亚残疾人权利方面的作用,但提出了对这一具有里程碑意义的立法进行法律改革的理由。通过分析《残疾人权利法案》的成功与失败,我们为《残疾人权利法案》的改革提供了清晰的路线图,以实现澳大利亚残疾人权利的现代化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The case for change: Reviewing the Disability Discrimination Act
This article pays respect to the role of the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) in revolutionising the rights of people with disabilities in Australia but makes the case for law reform of this landmark legislation. In analysing the successes and failures of the DDA, we provide a clear roadmap to reform the DDA toward a modern realisation of disability rights in Australia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信