齐赫泽的小说《雾与我们的现代性》

Tamar Sharabidze
{"title":"齐赫泽的小说《雾与我们的现代性》","authors":"Tamar Sharabidze","doi":"10.52340/2023.05.04.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Otar Chkheidze's novel The Mist describes Georgia's life as part of the Soviet Union. It is not about the first period of the re-annexation of the small country by the Empire, but about the subsequent years, which is also confirmed by one phrase of the main character, Salome: \"Thank God, we finished with the “proletculturschina” (proletarian culture) on time.\" i.e. The \"elite\" society, which mainly consists of family and relatives of state officials, has the full right to play \"aristocracy\": gatherings all night, entertainment based on the best planned programs, going to theater and opera every evening, etc. The novel depicts the falsity, ruthlessness, utilitarianism of this society. The author shows and mocks many defects of this society mainly using irony. The novel is based on historical reality - the \"cleansing\" of scientific institutions by the Soviet ideology from scientists of non-communist, bourgeois thinking, the promotion of non-professionals, “erasing” of honorable and valuable people from science in the name of truth. Otar Chkheidze also describes a specific historical fact - repressions against the Institute of Psychology; not criticism of Uznadze's \"Theory of Mood\" (which was the image of Georgia abroad and in the entire cultural world), but the attempt by so-called Soviet scientists, to destroy it; Otar Chkheidze does not stop at the literary interpretation of only one fact and shows that the described is typical for the entire Soviet Union. The finale of the work is shrouded in obscurity, the future of the characters is unknown, the reader's interest is high, which the write is well aware of: “A good speaker and a good listener should not be separated from each other so easily, but who knows, will we be named good speaker and good listener, huh? !\" When the novel was written, it was still 1954, “the Chief” (Stalin), just died recently and no one knew what new challenges history was preparing for both speakers and listeners;  no one knew whether they would remain \"good\" or not. In addition to showing the historical context and the typicality of the event, our task is also to show the reader that in our society the remnants of Soviet ideology are still strong nowadays, which partly derives from a sense of elitism, while each “regime” has its own elite. &nbsp","PeriodicalId":12686,"journal":{"name":"GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Otar Chkheidze's Novel The Mist and Our Modernity\",\"authors\":\"Tamar Sharabidze\",\"doi\":\"10.52340/2023.05.04.62\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Otar Chkheidze's novel The Mist describes Georgia's life as part of the Soviet Union. It is not about the first period of the re-annexation of the small country by the Empire, but about the subsequent years, which is also confirmed by one phrase of the main character, Salome: \\\"Thank God, we finished with the “proletculturschina” (proletarian culture) on time.\\\" i.e. The \\\"elite\\\" society, which mainly consists of family and relatives of state officials, has the full right to play \\\"aristocracy\\\": gatherings all night, entertainment based on the best planned programs, going to theater and opera every evening, etc. The novel depicts the falsity, ruthlessness, utilitarianism of this society. The author shows and mocks many defects of this society mainly using irony. The novel is based on historical reality - the \\\"cleansing\\\" of scientific institutions by the Soviet ideology from scientists of non-communist, bourgeois thinking, the promotion of non-professionals, “erasing” of honorable and valuable people from science in the name of truth. Otar Chkheidze also describes a specific historical fact - repressions against the Institute of Psychology; not criticism of Uznadze's \\\"Theory of Mood\\\" (which was the image of Georgia abroad and in the entire cultural world), but the attempt by so-called Soviet scientists, to destroy it; Otar Chkheidze does not stop at the literary interpretation of only one fact and shows that the described is typical for the entire Soviet Union. The finale of the work is shrouded in obscurity, the future of the characters is unknown, the reader's interest is high, which the write is well aware of: “A good speaker and a good listener should not be separated from each other so easily, but who knows, will we be named good speaker and good listener, huh? !\\\" When the novel was written, it was still 1954, “the Chief” (Stalin), just died recently and no one knew what new challenges history was preparing for both speakers and listeners;  no one knew whether they would remain \\\"good\\\" or not. In addition to showing the historical context and the typicality of the event, our task is also to show the reader that in our society the remnants of Soviet ideology are still strong nowadays, which partly derives from a sense of elitism, while each “regime” has its own elite. &nbsp\",\"PeriodicalId\":12686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52340/2023.05.04.62\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52340/2023.05.04.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

奥塔尔·齐赫泽的小说《迷雾》描述了格鲁吉亚作为苏联一部分的生活。它不是关于帝国重新吞并小国的第一个时期,而是关于随后的几年,这也被主角莎乐美的一句话所证实:“感谢上帝,我们按时完成了“无产阶级文化”(无产阶级文化)。”即主要由国家官员的家人和亲戚组成的“精英”社会,有充分的权利扮演“贵族”。整晚的聚会,基于最佳计划的娱乐活动,每天晚上去剧院和歌剧等。这部小说描绘了这个社会的虚伪、无情和功利主义。作者主要运用反讽的手法来展现和讽刺这个社会的诸多弊端。小说以历史现实为基础——苏联意识形态对科学机构的“清洗”,将具有非共产主义、资产阶级思想的科学家排除在外,提拔非专业人士,以真理的名义从科学领域“抹去”可敬而有价值的人。Otar Chkheidze还描述了一个特定的历史事实——对心理研究所的镇压;不是批评乌兹纳泽的“情绪理论”(这是格鲁吉亚在国外和整个文化界的形象),而是所谓的苏联科学家试图摧毁它;齐赫泽并没有止步于对一个事实的文学解释,而是表明所描述的是整个苏联的典型。作品的结局笼罩在朦胧之中,人物的未来是未知的,读者的兴趣很高,作者很清楚:“一个好的演讲者和一个好的听众不应该这么容易分开,但谁知道,我们会被称为好的演讲者和好的听众,嗯?小说写的时候还是1954年,“首领”(斯大林)刚刚去世,没有人知道历史为讲话者和听话者准备了什么样的新挑战; 没有人知道他们是否会保持“好”。除了展示这一事件的历史背景和典型性之外,我们的任务还在于向读者展示,在我们的社会中,苏联意识形态的残余至今仍很强大,这在一定程度上源于精英主义意识,而每个“政权”都有自己的精英。今天早上
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Otar Chkheidze's Novel The Mist and Our Modernity
Otar Chkheidze's novel The Mist describes Georgia's life as part of the Soviet Union. It is not about the first period of the re-annexation of the small country by the Empire, but about the subsequent years, which is also confirmed by one phrase of the main character, Salome: "Thank God, we finished with the “proletculturschina” (proletarian culture) on time." i.e. The "elite" society, which mainly consists of family and relatives of state officials, has the full right to play "aristocracy": gatherings all night, entertainment based on the best planned programs, going to theater and opera every evening, etc. The novel depicts the falsity, ruthlessness, utilitarianism of this society. The author shows and mocks many defects of this society mainly using irony. The novel is based on historical reality - the "cleansing" of scientific institutions by the Soviet ideology from scientists of non-communist, bourgeois thinking, the promotion of non-professionals, “erasing” of honorable and valuable people from science in the name of truth. Otar Chkheidze also describes a specific historical fact - repressions against the Institute of Psychology; not criticism of Uznadze's "Theory of Mood" (which was the image of Georgia abroad and in the entire cultural world), but the attempt by so-called Soviet scientists, to destroy it; Otar Chkheidze does not stop at the literary interpretation of only one fact and shows that the described is typical for the entire Soviet Union. The finale of the work is shrouded in obscurity, the future of the characters is unknown, the reader's interest is high, which the write is well aware of: “A good speaker and a good listener should not be separated from each other so easily, but who knows, will we be named good speaker and good listener, huh? !" When the novel was written, it was still 1954, “the Chief” (Stalin), just died recently and no one knew what new challenges history was preparing for both speakers and listeners;  no one knew whether they would remain "good" or not. In addition to showing the historical context and the typicality of the event, our task is also to show the reader that in our society the remnants of Soviet ideology are still strong nowadays, which partly derives from a sense of elitism, while each “regime” has its own elite.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信