{"title":"19世纪70年代的文学批评和乔治·策列铁里","authors":"Manana Kajaia","doi":"10.52340/2023.05.04.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" The paper discusses personal, public and creative style of the Georgian writer and public figure of the 19th century, Giorgi Tsereteli, as assessed by the critics of the 70s of the 19th century. We have an interesting creator in front of us. Giorgi Tsereteli, together with Ilia Chavchavadze and Akaki Tsereteli, from the 60s, i. e. from his youth until his death, carried the very heavy and responsible mission of an artist and, at the same time, of a teacher of the nation. On the way of critical discussion of Giorgi Tsereteli, among the four periods, we would conditionally single out the 70s of the 19th century. Among the critical letters of these years, according to the materials available to us, we would attribute the first place to the letters of Nikoloz Dimitridze (N. D. Kifiani), which were published in ‘Droeba’ No. 8, No. 14 of 1871 in the column ‘Bibliography’. The article ‘Journey to Svaneti’ by Sergei Meskhi, Anton Furtseladze, the venerable Georgian poet, ‘the king of the Georgian word’, is also discussed. He discussed Giorgi Tsereteli's story from the linguistic point of view with unusual scrupulousness. To sum up, Giorgi Tsereteli's contemporary and generally first critics prepared the basis for a deep scientific study of Giorgi Tsereteli. In their critical thinking, in fact, almost all the issues, that have found deepening and proper scientific broad argumentation in our time, were raised.","PeriodicalId":12686,"journal":{"name":"GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literary Criticism of the 1870s and Giorgi Tsereteli\",\"authors\":\"Manana Kajaia\",\"doi\":\"10.52340/2023.05.04.59\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\" The paper discusses personal, public and creative style of the Georgian writer and public figure of the 19th century, Giorgi Tsereteli, as assessed by the critics of the 70s of the 19th century. We have an interesting creator in front of us. Giorgi Tsereteli, together with Ilia Chavchavadze and Akaki Tsereteli, from the 60s, i. e. from his youth until his death, carried the very heavy and responsible mission of an artist and, at the same time, of a teacher of the nation. On the way of critical discussion of Giorgi Tsereteli, among the four periods, we would conditionally single out the 70s of the 19th century. Among the critical letters of these years, according to the materials available to us, we would attribute the first place to the letters of Nikoloz Dimitridze (N. D. Kifiani), which were published in ‘Droeba’ No. 8, No. 14 of 1871 in the column ‘Bibliography’. The article ‘Journey to Svaneti’ by Sergei Meskhi, Anton Furtseladze, the venerable Georgian poet, ‘the king of the Georgian word’, is also discussed. He discussed Giorgi Tsereteli's story from the linguistic point of view with unusual scrupulousness. To sum up, Giorgi Tsereteli's contemporary and generally first critics prepared the basis for a deep scientific study of Giorgi Tsereteli. In their critical thinking, in fact, almost all the issues, that have found deepening and proper scientific broad argumentation in our time, were raised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52340/2023.05.04.59\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52340/2023.05.04.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
,本文论述了19世纪70年代评论家对格鲁吉亚作家、公众人物策列铁里的个人风格、公共风格和创作风格的评价。我们面前有一个有趣的创造者。Giorgi Tsereteli与Ilia Chavchavadze和Akaki Tsereteli一起,从60年代起,即从青年到去世,担负着艺术家和民族教师的非常沉重和负责任的使命。在对策列铁里的批判讨论中,在这四个时期中,我们有条件地挑出19世纪70年代。在这些年来的批评信件中,根据我们所能获得的材料,我们认为第一名是Nikoloz Dimitridze (N. D. Kifiani)的信件,这些信件发表在1871年的《Droeba》第8期、第14期的“参考书目”一栏。文章“Svaneti之旅”,作者是Sergei Meskhi, Anton Furtseladze,格鲁吉亚诗人,“格鲁吉亚文字之王”。他以不同寻常的严谨从语言学的角度来讨论策列铁里的故事。综上所述,策列铁里同时代的、通常是最早的批评家为对策列铁里进行深入的科学研究奠定了基础。事实上,在他们的批判性思维中,几乎所有在我们这个时代找到了深入和适当的科学广泛论证的问题都被提出了。
Literary Criticism of the 1870s and Giorgi Tsereteli
The paper discusses personal, public and creative style of the Georgian writer and public figure of the 19th century, Giorgi Tsereteli, as assessed by the critics of the 70s of the 19th century. We have an interesting creator in front of us. Giorgi Tsereteli, together with Ilia Chavchavadze and Akaki Tsereteli, from the 60s, i. e. from his youth until his death, carried the very heavy and responsible mission of an artist and, at the same time, of a teacher of the nation. On the way of critical discussion of Giorgi Tsereteli, among the four periods, we would conditionally single out the 70s of the 19th century. Among the critical letters of these years, according to the materials available to us, we would attribute the first place to the letters of Nikoloz Dimitridze (N. D. Kifiani), which were published in ‘Droeba’ No. 8, No. 14 of 1871 in the column ‘Bibliography’. The article ‘Journey to Svaneti’ by Sergei Meskhi, Anton Furtseladze, the venerable Georgian poet, ‘the king of the Georgian word’, is also discussed. He discussed Giorgi Tsereteli's story from the linguistic point of view with unusual scrupulousness. To sum up, Giorgi Tsereteli's contemporary and generally first critics prepared the basis for a deep scientific study of Giorgi Tsereteli. In their critical thinking, in fact, almost all the issues, that have found deepening and proper scientific broad argumentation in our time, were raised.