高温对低碳钢冷弯型钢柱截面屈曲能力的影响——试验研究与有限元模拟

IF 0.9 Q4 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Varun Sabu Sam, M.S. Adarsh, Garry Robson Lyngdoh, Garry Wegara K. Marak, N. Anand, Khalifa Al-Jabri, Diana Andrushia
{"title":"高温对低碳钢冷弯型钢柱截面屈曲能力的影响——试验研究与有限元模拟","authors":"Varun Sabu Sam, M.S. Adarsh, Garry Robson Lyngdoh, Garry Wegara K. Marak, N. Anand, Khalifa Al-Jabri, Diana Andrushia","doi":"10.1108/jsfe-08-2023-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The capability of steel columns to support their design loads is highly affected by the time of exposure and temperature magnitude, which causes deterioration of mechanical properties of steel under fire conditions. It is known that structural steel loses strength and stiffness as temperature increases, particularly above 400 °C. The duration of time in which steel is exposed to high temperatures also has an impact on how much strength it loses. The time-dependent response of steel is critical when estimating load carrying capacity of steel columns exposed to fire. Thus, investigating the structural response of cold-formed steel (CFS) columns is gaining more interest due to the nature of such structural elements. Design/methodology/approach In this study, experiments were conducted on two CFS configurations: back-to-back (B-B) channel and toe-to-toe (T-T) channel sections. All CFS column specimens were exposed to different temperatures following the standard fire curve and cooled by air or water. A total of 14 tests were conducted to evaluate the capacity of the CFS sections. The axial resistance and yield deformation were noted for both section types at elevated temperatures. The CFS column sections were modelled to simulate the section's behaviour under various temperature exposures using the general-purpose finite element (FE) program ABAQUS. The results from FE modelling agreed well with the experimental results. Ultimate load of experiment and finite element model (FEM) are compared with each other. The difference in percentage and ratio between both are presented. Findings The results showed that B-B configuration showed better performance for all the investigated parameters than T-T sections. A noticeable loss in the ultimate strength of 34.5 and 65.6% was observed at 90 min (986℃) for B-B specimens cooled using air and water, respectively. However, the reduction was 29.9 and 46% in the T-T configuration, respectively. Originality/value This research paper focusses on assessing the buckling strength of heated CFS sections to analyse the mode of failure of CFS sections with B-B and T-T design configurations under the effect of elevated temperature.","PeriodicalId":45033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structural Fire Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of elevated temperature on buckling capacity of mild steel-based cold-formed steel column sections– experimental investigation and finite element modelling\",\"authors\":\"Varun Sabu Sam, M.S. Adarsh, Garry Robson Lyngdoh, Garry Wegara K. Marak, N. Anand, Khalifa Al-Jabri, Diana Andrushia\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jsfe-08-2023-0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose The capability of steel columns to support their design loads is highly affected by the time of exposure and temperature magnitude, which causes deterioration of mechanical properties of steel under fire conditions. It is known that structural steel loses strength and stiffness as temperature increases, particularly above 400 °C. The duration of time in which steel is exposed to high temperatures also has an impact on how much strength it loses. The time-dependent response of steel is critical when estimating load carrying capacity of steel columns exposed to fire. Thus, investigating the structural response of cold-formed steel (CFS) columns is gaining more interest due to the nature of such structural elements. Design/methodology/approach In this study, experiments were conducted on two CFS configurations: back-to-back (B-B) channel and toe-to-toe (T-T) channel sections. All CFS column specimens were exposed to different temperatures following the standard fire curve and cooled by air or water. A total of 14 tests were conducted to evaluate the capacity of the CFS sections. The axial resistance and yield deformation were noted for both section types at elevated temperatures. The CFS column sections were modelled to simulate the section's behaviour under various temperature exposures using the general-purpose finite element (FE) program ABAQUS. The results from FE modelling agreed well with the experimental results. Ultimate load of experiment and finite element model (FEM) are compared with each other. The difference in percentage and ratio between both are presented. Findings The results showed that B-B configuration showed better performance for all the investigated parameters than T-T sections. A noticeable loss in the ultimate strength of 34.5 and 65.6% was observed at 90 min (986℃) for B-B specimens cooled using air and water, respectively. However, the reduction was 29.9 and 46% in the T-T configuration, respectively. Originality/value This research paper focusses on assessing the buckling strength of heated CFS sections to analyse the mode of failure of CFS sections with B-B and T-T design configurations under the effect of elevated temperature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Structural Fire Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Structural Fire Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsfe-08-2023-0033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structural Fire Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsfe-08-2023-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钢柱承受设计荷载的能力受暴露时间和温度量级的影响较大,在火灾条件下会导致钢的力学性能恶化。众所周知,随着温度的升高,特别是在400°C以上,结构钢会失去强度和刚度。钢暴露在高温下的时间长度也会影响其强度损失的程度。在火灾作用下钢柱的承载能力评估中,钢结构的时变响应至关重要。因此,由于这种结构元素的性质,研究冷弯型钢(CFS)柱的结构响应正获得更多的兴趣。在本研究中,实验采用了两种CFS配置:背靠背(B-B)通道和脚趾到脚趾(T-T)通道。所有的CFS柱试件都按照标准的火灾曲线暴露在不同的温度下,然后用空气或水冷却。总共进行了14次试验,以评估CFS各段的能力。在高温下,这两种截面的轴向阻力和屈服变形都被记录下来。利用通用有限元程序ABAQUS对CFS柱截面进行建模,模拟其在不同温度暴露下的行为。有限元模拟结果与试验结果吻合较好。将试验极限荷载与有限元模型进行了比较。给出了两者在百分比和比例上的差异。结果表明,B-B结构在各参数上均优于T-T结构。在986℃(空气冷却)90 min时,B-B试样的极限强度分别下降了34.5%和65.6%。然而,在T-T配置下,分别减少了29.9%和46%。本文通过对受热CFS截面屈曲强度的评估,分析了B-B和T-T两种设计构型CFS截面在高温作用下的破坏模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of elevated temperature on buckling capacity of mild steel-based cold-formed steel column sections– experimental investigation and finite element modelling
Purpose The capability of steel columns to support their design loads is highly affected by the time of exposure and temperature magnitude, which causes deterioration of mechanical properties of steel under fire conditions. It is known that structural steel loses strength and stiffness as temperature increases, particularly above 400 °C. The duration of time in which steel is exposed to high temperatures also has an impact on how much strength it loses. The time-dependent response of steel is critical when estimating load carrying capacity of steel columns exposed to fire. Thus, investigating the structural response of cold-formed steel (CFS) columns is gaining more interest due to the nature of such structural elements. Design/methodology/approach In this study, experiments were conducted on two CFS configurations: back-to-back (B-B) channel and toe-to-toe (T-T) channel sections. All CFS column specimens were exposed to different temperatures following the standard fire curve and cooled by air or water. A total of 14 tests were conducted to evaluate the capacity of the CFS sections. The axial resistance and yield deformation were noted for both section types at elevated temperatures. The CFS column sections were modelled to simulate the section's behaviour under various temperature exposures using the general-purpose finite element (FE) program ABAQUS. The results from FE modelling agreed well with the experimental results. Ultimate load of experiment and finite element model (FEM) are compared with each other. The difference in percentage and ratio between both are presented. Findings The results showed that B-B configuration showed better performance for all the investigated parameters than T-T sections. A noticeable loss in the ultimate strength of 34.5 and 65.6% was observed at 90 min (986℃) for B-B specimens cooled using air and water, respectively. However, the reduction was 29.9 and 46% in the T-T configuration, respectively. Originality/value This research paper focusses on assessing the buckling strength of heated CFS sections to analyse the mode of failure of CFS sections with B-B and T-T design configurations under the effect of elevated temperature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Structural Fire Engineering
Journal of Structural Fire Engineering CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信