概念证明:稳定的全血材料适用于近患者检测设备的外部质量评估

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Jana Wütherich, Stephanie Zylla, Emmanuel Bissé, Matthias Nauck, Astrid Petersmann
{"title":"概念证明:稳定的全血材料适用于近患者检测设备的外部质量评估","authors":"Jana Wütherich, Stephanie Zylla, Emmanuel Bissé, Matthias Nauck, Astrid Petersmann","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2023-0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Even though reliable glucose concentration measurements are essential in diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes mellitus, external quality assurance based on mandatory reference method values can only be conducted to a limited extent for measurements in whole blood. The reason is the lack of stabilized whole blood materials suitable for the application in glucose measurement devices used in near-patient testing. Methods Two patented whole blood stabilizers were tested using four commercially available near-patient testing devices and one patient self-testing device for plasma-referenced glucose measurements. Furthermore, a laboratory method for plasma-glucose measurements was included. Venous whole blood samples from 30 apparently healthy volunteers were used. Two whole blood samples (stabilizer A and B) per subject were kept at room temperature over the study period of seven days and aliquots were taken each day from the original sample for measurement on all devices. After venous puncture, left over whole blood from the collection system was used for immediate glucose measurements without stabilizer on the near-patient testing devices. Results Each investigated device gave stable results at least for one of the two stabilizers for a period of four days. Imprecision based on quality controls ranged between 1.7 and 4.8 % coefficient of variation for near-patient testing devices, but did not reflect observed variability in measurement results from stabilized and unstabilized whole blood in one device. In addition, a considerable deviation of 0.8 mmol/L was observed among the near-patient testing devices underlining the need for reference method values in external quality control. Conclusions Our study provides proof of concept that for each investigated device at least one stabilizer of glucose in whole blood shows a good performance for at least four days. Therefore, these stabilizers appear to be suitable candidate materials for external quality assessment of near-patient testing devices.","PeriodicalId":55986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"57 19","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proof of concept: stabilized whole blood material suitable for external quality assessment of near-patient testing devices\",\"authors\":\"Jana Wütherich, Stephanie Zylla, Emmanuel Bissé, Matthias Nauck, Astrid Petersmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/labmed-2023-0082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives Even though reliable glucose concentration measurements are essential in diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes mellitus, external quality assurance based on mandatory reference method values can only be conducted to a limited extent for measurements in whole blood. The reason is the lack of stabilized whole blood materials suitable for the application in glucose measurement devices used in near-patient testing. Methods Two patented whole blood stabilizers were tested using four commercially available near-patient testing devices and one patient self-testing device for plasma-referenced glucose measurements. Furthermore, a laboratory method for plasma-glucose measurements was included. Venous whole blood samples from 30 apparently healthy volunteers were used. Two whole blood samples (stabilizer A and B) per subject were kept at room temperature over the study period of seven days and aliquots were taken each day from the original sample for measurement on all devices. After venous puncture, left over whole blood from the collection system was used for immediate glucose measurements without stabilizer on the near-patient testing devices. Results Each investigated device gave stable results at least for one of the two stabilizers for a period of four days. Imprecision based on quality controls ranged between 1.7 and 4.8 % coefficient of variation for near-patient testing devices, but did not reflect observed variability in measurement results from stabilized and unstabilized whole blood in one device. In addition, a considerable deviation of 0.8 mmol/L was observed among the near-patient testing devices underlining the need for reference method values in external quality control. Conclusions Our study provides proof of concept that for each investigated device at least one stabilizer of glucose in whole blood shows a good performance for at least four days. Therefore, these stabilizers appear to be suitable candidate materials for external quality assessment of near-patient testing devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"57 19\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2023-0082\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2023-0082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管可靠的葡萄糖浓度测量在糖尿病的诊断和监测中至关重要,但基于强制性参考方法值的外部质量保证只能在有限的程度上用于全血测量。原因是缺乏稳定的全血材料,适合应用于近病人测试中使用的葡萄糖测量设备。方法采用4台市售近患者检测装置和1台患者自检装置对两种专利全血稳定剂进行血浆参考血糖测定。此外,还包括一种血浆葡萄糖测量的实验室方法。使用30名表面健康的志愿者的静脉全血样本。在7天的研究期间,每个受试者的两份全血样本(稳定剂A和B)在室温下保存,每天从原始样本中取出等量的血液,在所有设备上进行测量。静脉穿刺后,收集系统剩余的全血在近患者检测装置上进行即时血糖测量,不使用稳定剂。结果两种稳定剂中的一种至少在4天内稳定。近病人检测装置的质量控制不精确性在1.7 - 4.8%的变异系数之间,但不能反映在一个设备中稳定和不稳定全血测量结果的可变性。此外,在近患者检测装置之间观察到0.8 mmol/L的相当大的偏差,强调了在外部质量控制中需要参考方法值。我们的研究提供了概念证明,对于每个被研究的设备,至少有一种全血葡萄糖稳定剂表现出至少四天的良好性能。因此,这些稳定剂似乎是近患者检测装置外部质量评估的合适候选材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proof of concept: stabilized whole blood material suitable for external quality assessment of near-patient testing devices
Abstract Objectives Even though reliable glucose concentration measurements are essential in diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes mellitus, external quality assurance based on mandatory reference method values can only be conducted to a limited extent for measurements in whole blood. The reason is the lack of stabilized whole blood materials suitable for the application in glucose measurement devices used in near-patient testing. Methods Two patented whole blood stabilizers were tested using four commercially available near-patient testing devices and one patient self-testing device for plasma-referenced glucose measurements. Furthermore, a laboratory method for plasma-glucose measurements was included. Venous whole blood samples from 30 apparently healthy volunteers were used. Two whole blood samples (stabilizer A and B) per subject were kept at room temperature over the study period of seven days and aliquots were taken each day from the original sample for measurement on all devices. After venous puncture, left over whole blood from the collection system was used for immediate glucose measurements without stabilizer on the near-patient testing devices. Results Each investigated device gave stable results at least for one of the two stabilizers for a period of four days. Imprecision based on quality controls ranged between 1.7 and 4.8 % coefficient of variation for near-patient testing devices, but did not reflect observed variability in measurement results from stabilized and unstabilized whole blood in one device. In addition, a considerable deviation of 0.8 mmol/L was observed among the near-patient testing devices underlining the need for reference method values in external quality control. Conclusions Our study provides proof of concept that for each investigated device at least one stabilizer of glucose in whole blood shows a good performance for at least four days. Therefore, these stabilizers appear to be suitable candidate materials for external quality assessment of near-patient testing devices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Laboratory Medicine Mathematics-Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Laboratory Medicine (JLM) is a bi-monthly published journal that reports on the latest developments in laboratory medicine. Particular focus is placed on the diagnostic aspects of the clinical laboratory, although technical, regulatory, and educational topics are equally covered. The Journal specializes in the publication of high-standard, competent and timely review articles on clinical, methodological and pathogenic aspects of modern laboratory diagnostics. These reviews are critically reviewed by expert reviewers and JLM’s Associate Editors who are specialists in the various subdisciplines of laboratory medicine. In addition, JLM publishes original research articles, case reports, point/counterpoint articles and letters to the editor, all of which are peer reviewed by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信