论精算公平年金的不公平性

IF 1.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS
An Chen, Steven Vanduffel
{"title":"论精算公平年金的不公平性","authors":"An Chen, Steven Vanduffel","doi":"10.1007/s10203-023-00399-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Actuarial fairness pertains to the situation in which the price of an insurance contract is equal to its expected outcome. We show that actuarial fairness leads to “unfairness” in that annuitants with higher survival rates can choose a better payoff in the sense of second-order stochastic dominance than those with lower survival rates. To deal with this issue, we propose equal utility pricing, i.e., we determine prices such that all contracts have the same (nonlinear) utility from the viewpoint of a third party (e.g., a social planner). This approach is of particular relevance with respect to the design of group self-annuitization schemes.","PeriodicalId":43711,"journal":{"name":"Decisions in Economics and Finance","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the unfairness of actuarial fair annuities\",\"authors\":\"An Chen, Steven Vanduffel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10203-023-00399-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Actuarial fairness pertains to the situation in which the price of an insurance contract is equal to its expected outcome. We show that actuarial fairness leads to “unfairness” in that annuitants with higher survival rates can choose a better payoff in the sense of second-order stochastic dominance than those with lower survival rates. To deal with this issue, we propose equal utility pricing, i.e., we determine prices such that all contracts have the same (nonlinear) utility from the viewpoint of a third party (e.g., a social planner). This approach is of particular relevance with respect to the design of group self-annuitization schemes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decisions in Economics and Finance\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decisions in Economics and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-023-00399-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decisions in Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-023-00399-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精算公平是指保险合同的价格与其预期结果相等的情况。我们表明,精算公平导致“不公平”,因为在二阶随机优势意义上,生存率较高的养老金领取者比生存率较低的养老金领取者可以选择更好的收益。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了平等效用定价,也就是说,我们确定的价格使得所有合同从第三方(如社会规划者)的角度来看都具有相同的(非线性)效用。这种方法与团体自我年金化计划的设计特别相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the unfairness of actuarial fair annuities
Abstract Actuarial fairness pertains to the situation in which the price of an insurance contract is equal to its expected outcome. We show that actuarial fairness leads to “unfairness” in that annuitants with higher survival rates can choose a better payoff in the sense of second-order stochastic dominance than those with lower survival rates. To deal with this issue, we propose equal utility pricing, i.e., we determine prices such that all contracts have the same (nonlinear) utility from the viewpoint of a third party (e.g., a social planner). This approach is of particular relevance with respect to the design of group self-annuitization schemes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Decisions in Economics and Finance
Decisions in Economics and Finance SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Decisions in Economics and Finance: A Journal of Applied Mathematics is the official publication of the Association for Mathematics Applied to Social and Economic Sciences (AMASES). It provides a specialised forum for the publication of research in all areas of mathematics as applied to economics, finance, insurance, management and social sciences. Primary emphasis is placed on original research concerning topics in mathematics or computational techniques which are explicitly motivated by or contribute to the analysis of economic or financial problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信