{"title":"Parathyrin化验。两种商业免疫放射测定试剂盒的分析评价。","authors":"D R Pledger, C Carr, T I Sims, K R Johnson","doi":"10.1515/cclm.1990.28.4.211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have performed a comparative evaluation of two Immuno Radiometric Assay (IRMA) kits for parathyrin against an existing Radioimmuno Assay (RIA) technique for the measurement of intact parathyrin. The analytical evaluation which was performed in line with the ECCLS recommended kit evaluation protocol showed a marginal improvement in precision with the new assays. There was a substantial improvement in the theoretical limit of detection utilising the IRMA kits although it may prove difficult to realize this improvement in practice with individual samples because of differing protein matrices. The evaluation also demonstrated the degree of parallelism and range of linearity of both kits as well as inaccuracies when compared with the International Reference Preparation for parathyrin (IRP 79/500) as the accepted standard. The demonstration of lack of agreement between measured and kit assigned results for standards when cross-over studies between kits were performed may highlight a possible contributing factor to inaccuracy. Alternatively there may be a difference of antisera avidity within the kits for intact parathyrin. Whilst minor differences in sample stability were demonstrated between the kits, the sample stability was much improved compared to that for intact parathyrin measurement by RIA. The correlation studies showed a degree of correlation consistent with other comparisons similarly performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie","volume":"28 4","pages":"211-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/cclm.1990.28.4.211","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parathyrin assay. An analytical evaluation of two commercial Immuno Radiometric Assay kits.\",\"authors\":\"D R Pledger, C Carr, T I Sims, K R Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm.1990.28.4.211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We have performed a comparative evaluation of two Immuno Radiometric Assay (IRMA) kits for parathyrin against an existing Radioimmuno Assay (RIA) technique for the measurement of intact parathyrin. The analytical evaluation which was performed in line with the ECCLS recommended kit evaluation protocol showed a marginal improvement in precision with the new assays. There was a substantial improvement in the theoretical limit of detection utilising the IRMA kits although it may prove difficult to realize this improvement in practice with individual samples because of differing protein matrices. The evaluation also demonstrated the degree of parallelism and range of linearity of both kits as well as inaccuracies when compared with the International Reference Preparation for parathyrin (IRP 79/500) as the accepted standard. The demonstration of lack of agreement between measured and kit assigned results for standards when cross-over studies between kits were performed may highlight a possible contributing factor to inaccuracy. Alternatively there may be a difference of antisera avidity within the kits for intact parathyrin. Whilst minor differences in sample stability were demonstrated between the kits, the sample stability was much improved compared to that for intact parathyrin measurement by RIA. The correlation studies showed a degree of correlation consistent with other comparisons similarly performed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"211-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/cclm.1990.28.4.211\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.1990.28.4.211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.1990.28.4.211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Parathyrin assay. An analytical evaluation of two commercial Immuno Radiometric Assay kits.
We have performed a comparative evaluation of two Immuno Radiometric Assay (IRMA) kits for parathyrin against an existing Radioimmuno Assay (RIA) technique for the measurement of intact parathyrin. The analytical evaluation which was performed in line with the ECCLS recommended kit evaluation protocol showed a marginal improvement in precision with the new assays. There was a substantial improvement in the theoretical limit of detection utilising the IRMA kits although it may prove difficult to realize this improvement in practice with individual samples because of differing protein matrices. The evaluation also demonstrated the degree of parallelism and range of linearity of both kits as well as inaccuracies when compared with the International Reference Preparation for parathyrin (IRP 79/500) as the accepted standard. The demonstration of lack of agreement between measured and kit assigned results for standards when cross-over studies between kits were performed may highlight a possible contributing factor to inaccuracy. Alternatively there may be a difference of antisera avidity within the kits for intact parathyrin. Whilst minor differences in sample stability were demonstrated between the kits, the sample stability was much improved compared to that for intact parathyrin measurement by RIA. The correlation studies showed a degree of correlation consistent with other comparisons similarly performed.