Parathyrin化验。两种商业免疫放射测定试剂盒的分析评价。

D R Pledger, C Carr, T I Sims, K R Johnson
{"title":"Parathyrin化验。两种商业免疫放射测定试剂盒的分析评价。","authors":"D R Pledger,&nbsp;C Carr,&nbsp;T I Sims,&nbsp;K R Johnson","doi":"10.1515/cclm.1990.28.4.211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have performed a comparative evaluation of two Immuno Radiometric Assay (IRMA) kits for parathyrin against an existing Radioimmuno Assay (RIA) technique for the measurement of intact parathyrin. The analytical evaluation which was performed in line with the ECCLS recommended kit evaluation protocol showed a marginal improvement in precision with the new assays. There was a substantial improvement in the theoretical limit of detection utilising the IRMA kits although it may prove difficult to realize this improvement in practice with individual samples because of differing protein matrices. The evaluation also demonstrated the degree of parallelism and range of linearity of both kits as well as inaccuracies when compared with the International Reference Preparation for parathyrin (IRP 79/500) as the accepted standard. The demonstration of lack of agreement between measured and kit assigned results for standards when cross-over studies between kits were performed may highlight a possible contributing factor to inaccuracy. Alternatively there may be a difference of antisera avidity within the kits for intact parathyrin. Whilst minor differences in sample stability were demonstrated between the kits, the sample stability was much improved compared to that for intact parathyrin measurement by RIA. The correlation studies showed a degree of correlation consistent with other comparisons similarly performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie","volume":"28 4","pages":"211-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/cclm.1990.28.4.211","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parathyrin assay. An analytical evaluation of two commercial Immuno Radiometric Assay kits.\",\"authors\":\"D R Pledger,&nbsp;C Carr,&nbsp;T I Sims,&nbsp;K R Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm.1990.28.4.211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We have performed a comparative evaluation of two Immuno Radiometric Assay (IRMA) kits for parathyrin against an existing Radioimmuno Assay (RIA) technique for the measurement of intact parathyrin. The analytical evaluation which was performed in line with the ECCLS recommended kit evaluation protocol showed a marginal improvement in precision with the new assays. There was a substantial improvement in the theoretical limit of detection utilising the IRMA kits although it may prove difficult to realize this improvement in practice with individual samples because of differing protein matrices. The evaluation also demonstrated the degree of parallelism and range of linearity of both kits as well as inaccuracies when compared with the International Reference Preparation for parathyrin (IRP 79/500) as the accepted standard. The demonstration of lack of agreement between measured and kit assigned results for standards when cross-over studies between kits were performed may highlight a possible contributing factor to inaccuracy. Alternatively there may be a difference of antisera avidity within the kits for intact parathyrin. Whilst minor differences in sample stability were demonstrated between the kits, the sample stability was much improved compared to that for intact parathyrin measurement by RIA. The correlation studies showed a degree of correlation consistent with other comparisons similarly performed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"211-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/cclm.1990.28.4.211\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.1990.28.4.211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.1990.28.4.211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们对两种用于甲状旁腺素的免疫放射测定(IRMA)试剂盒与现有的用于测量完整甲状旁腺素的放射免疫测定(RIA)技术进行了比较评估。根据ECCLS推荐的试剂盒评估方案进行的分析评估显示,新测定法的精确度略有提高。利用IRMA试剂盒的理论检测极限有了实质性的改进,尽管由于不同的蛋白质基质,在单个样品的实践中可能难以实现这种改进。该评价还显示了两种试剂盒的平行度和线性范围,以及与国际甲状旁腺素参考制剂(IRP 79/500)作为公认标准相比的不准确性。当在不同试剂盒之间进行交叉研究时,测量结果和试剂盒指定的标准结果之间缺乏一致性的证明可能突出了导致不准确的可能因素。另外,在完整甲状旁腺素试剂盒中可能存在抗血清活性的差异。虽然样品稳定性在试剂盒之间存在微小差异,但与RIA完整的甲状旁腺素测量相比,样品稳定性得到了很大改善。相关研究表明,与其他类似的比较有一定程度的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parathyrin assay. An analytical evaluation of two commercial Immuno Radiometric Assay kits.

We have performed a comparative evaluation of two Immuno Radiometric Assay (IRMA) kits for parathyrin against an existing Radioimmuno Assay (RIA) technique for the measurement of intact parathyrin. The analytical evaluation which was performed in line with the ECCLS recommended kit evaluation protocol showed a marginal improvement in precision with the new assays. There was a substantial improvement in the theoretical limit of detection utilising the IRMA kits although it may prove difficult to realize this improvement in practice with individual samples because of differing protein matrices. The evaluation also demonstrated the degree of parallelism and range of linearity of both kits as well as inaccuracies when compared with the International Reference Preparation for parathyrin (IRP 79/500) as the accepted standard. The demonstration of lack of agreement between measured and kit assigned results for standards when cross-over studies between kits were performed may highlight a possible contributing factor to inaccuracy. Alternatively there may be a difference of antisera avidity within the kits for intact parathyrin. Whilst minor differences in sample stability were demonstrated between the kits, the sample stability was much improved compared to that for intact parathyrin measurement by RIA. The correlation studies showed a degree of correlation consistent with other comparisons similarly performed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信