目标日期基金,不当销售和滥用

Rob Brown
{"title":"目标日期基金,不当销售和滥用","authors":"Rob Brown","doi":"10.3905/jwm.2023.1.222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Target Date Funds (TDFs) are portfolios with a pre-defined end date, the so-called “target date,” and the essential attribute that they reduce their allocation to stocks with the passage of time. The proposition upon which TDFs are both sold and bought is that investors benefit from the consistent reduction in portfolio risk as investors progress toward the end of their applicable investment time horizon. The manufacturers of TDFs have a clear and unambiguous motivation to develop an appealing story and associated product that encapsulates said story, so as to grow their assets under management. The pension plan sponsor’s motivation is to provide investment options that protect it from regulatory and litigation risk. Unfortunately, the data offer a different reality. The data support the conclusion that investors are harmed by the use of TDFs when sufficient time diversification is present, resulting from a sufficient number of relatively equal-sized contributions and/or withdrawals evenly dispersed over time. Specifically, the analysis shows that 1) the use of precious metals remains unattractive for investment time periods of 12.5 years and longer, 2) optimal starting allocations of 100% stocks remain preferable for investment time periods of 5 years and longer, and 3) the use of TDFs remains significantly harmful to investors’ wellbeing for periods of 15 years and longer. The causality driving these results is both simple and straightforward. First, bonds and precious metals impose a severe return penalty on the investor. The geometric mean returns are −72% and −87% proportionately lower than for stocks, respectively. Second, bonds and precious metals impose extended (many decade-long) episodic eras of negative returns, unlike stocks. Third, time diversification applicable to circumstances where contributions and/or withdrawals of relatively equal size occur over extended time periods and with high frequency make the use of bonds, precious metals, and TDFs purely redundant and non-contributive.","PeriodicalId":175460,"journal":{"name":"The journal of wealth management","volume":"180 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Target Date Funds, Mis-Sold and Misused\",\"authors\":\"Rob Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jwm.2023.1.222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Target Date Funds (TDFs) are portfolios with a pre-defined end date, the so-called “target date,” and the essential attribute that they reduce their allocation to stocks with the passage of time. The proposition upon which TDFs are both sold and bought is that investors benefit from the consistent reduction in portfolio risk as investors progress toward the end of their applicable investment time horizon. The manufacturers of TDFs have a clear and unambiguous motivation to develop an appealing story and associated product that encapsulates said story, so as to grow their assets under management. The pension plan sponsor’s motivation is to provide investment options that protect it from regulatory and litigation risk. Unfortunately, the data offer a different reality. The data support the conclusion that investors are harmed by the use of TDFs when sufficient time diversification is present, resulting from a sufficient number of relatively equal-sized contributions and/or withdrawals evenly dispersed over time. Specifically, the analysis shows that 1) the use of precious metals remains unattractive for investment time periods of 12.5 years and longer, 2) optimal starting allocations of 100% stocks remain preferable for investment time periods of 5 years and longer, and 3) the use of TDFs remains significantly harmful to investors’ wellbeing for periods of 15 years and longer. The causality driving these results is both simple and straightforward. First, bonds and precious metals impose a severe return penalty on the investor. The geometric mean returns are −72% and −87% proportionately lower than for stocks, respectively. Second, bonds and precious metals impose extended (many decade-long) episodic eras of negative returns, unlike stocks. Third, time diversification applicable to circumstances where contributions and/or withdrawals of relatively equal size occur over extended time periods and with high frequency make the use of bonds, precious metals, and TDFs purely redundant and non-contributive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of wealth management\",\"volume\":\"180 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of wealth management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2023.1.222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of wealth management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2023.1.222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标日期基金(tdf)是一种具有预定义结束日期的投资组合,即所谓的“目标日期”,其基本属性是随着时间的推移减少股票配置。卖出和买入tdf的主张是,随着投资者接近其适用的投资期限,投资组合风险的持续降低将使投资者受益。tdf的制造商有一个明确而明确的动机来开发一个吸引人的故事和相关的产品来封装这个故事,从而增加他们的资产管理。养老金计划发起人的动机是提供保护其免受监管和诉讼风险的投资选择。不幸的是,数据提供了一个不同的现实。数据支持这样的结论,即当存在足够的时间多样化时,由于足够数量的相对大小相等的投入和/或提取均匀地分散在时间上,因此使用tdf会损害投资者。具体而言,分析表明,1)在12.5年及以上的投资周期中,贵金属的使用仍然没有吸引力;2)在5年及以上的投资周期中,100%股票的最佳初始配置仍然是可取的;3)在15年及以上的投资周期中,使用tdf仍然对投资者的健康有害。导致这些结果的因果关系既简单又直接。首先,债券和贵金属对投资者造成了严重的回报惩罚。几何平均回报率分别比股票低72%和87%。其次,与股票不同,债券和贵金属带来了长期(许多长达十年)的阶段性负回报。第三,时间多样化适用于这样的情况:在较长的时期内,缴款和/或取款的数额相对相等,而且使用债券、贵金属和tdf的频率很高,这完全是多余的和无贡献的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Target Date Funds, Mis-Sold and Misused
Target Date Funds (TDFs) are portfolios with a pre-defined end date, the so-called “target date,” and the essential attribute that they reduce their allocation to stocks with the passage of time. The proposition upon which TDFs are both sold and bought is that investors benefit from the consistent reduction in portfolio risk as investors progress toward the end of their applicable investment time horizon. The manufacturers of TDFs have a clear and unambiguous motivation to develop an appealing story and associated product that encapsulates said story, so as to grow their assets under management. The pension plan sponsor’s motivation is to provide investment options that protect it from regulatory and litigation risk. Unfortunately, the data offer a different reality. The data support the conclusion that investors are harmed by the use of TDFs when sufficient time diversification is present, resulting from a sufficient number of relatively equal-sized contributions and/or withdrawals evenly dispersed over time. Specifically, the analysis shows that 1) the use of precious metals remains unattractive for investment time periods of 12.5 years and longer, 2) optimal starting allocations of 100% stocks remain preferable for investment time periods of 5 years and longer, and 3) the use of TDFs remains significantly harmful to investors’ wellbeing for periods of 15 years and longer. The causality driving these results is both simple and straightforward. First, bonds and precious metals impose a severe return penalty on the investor. The geometric mean returns are −72% and −87% proportionately lower than for stocks, respectively. Second, bonds and precious metals impose extended (many decade-long) episodic eras of negative returns, unlike stocks. Third, time diversification applicable to circumstances where contributions and/or withdrawals of relatively equal size occur over extended time periods and with high frequency make the use of bonds, precious metals, and TDFs purely redundant and non-contributive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信