Etiological factors and pathophysiological mechanisms of the reparative process in various types of cephalohematoms and methods of their treatment

BACKGROUND: The evolutionarily formed biomechanism of childbirth in humans causes a high incidence of head injuries during the reproductive process. One of the indicators of cranial injury is cephalohematoma. Despite the presence of a number of protective and adaptive mechanisms on the part of the fetus, the frequency of subperiosteal hemorrhages remains high and does not tend to decrease. Modern knowledge about the etiology of cephalohematomas does not always fit into the framework of classical ideas about the causes of hemorrhage under the periosteum. The lack of a unified understanding of the pathomechanisms occurring in a long-term subperiosteal hemorrhage leads to a mismatch of tactical actions during their treatment and the development of complications. AIM: To assess the role of etiological factors in the formation of subperiosteal hemorrhage in newborns and to determine the main direction of the pathophysiological process during repair with various types of cephalohematomas and methods of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study of 243 newborns with the presence of cephalohematomas of various localization for the period from 20182022 was carried out, an analysis of the etiological prerequisites, features of the reparative process with various volumes of hemorrhages and methods of treatment using descriptive statistics methods was carried out. RESULTS: The predominance of children with the presence of cephalohematomas with a history of the absence of hydraulic protection of the head due to early rupture of amniotic fluid was revealed in relation to other mechanical factors of intranatal damage. The greatest number of subperiosteal hemorrhages was noted in newborns from multiparous mothers. The main non-traumatic factor contributing to the formation of cephalohematomas was the factor of infectious effect on the fetus. The predominance of osteomalacic processes with medium and large volumes of cephalohematomas in relation to small-sized cephalohematomas, which had a tendency to early ossification, was noted. The effectiveness of therapeutic aspiration was noted in all cases of observation of newborns from the surgical subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: One of the most significant etiological factors for the occurrence of cephalohematomas in the observation group was the factor of intranatal mechanical trauma to the soft tissues of the head, due to the lack of hydraulic protection. The numerical predominance of newborns with subperiosteal hemorrhages from multiparous mothers contradicts the basic physiological canons of the biomechanism of labor and may be due to the high incidence of the infectious factor. The direction of the pathophysiological process in the course of repair in case of periosteal detachment may depend not only on microenvironmental factors, but also be determined by the amount of hemorrhage. The use of puncture treatment for cephalohematomas can significantly reduce the number of complications associated with long-term persistence of subperiosteal hemorrhage.