在/s词旁边工作:语言的偏颇性和局部性的个案研究

Crispin Thurlow
{"title":"在/s词旁边工作:语言的偏颇性和局部性的个案研究","authors":"Crispin Thurlow","doi":"10.1177/26349795231202250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Part visual essay, the case study reported here considers the classist implications of over-attending to (spoken) language in the workplace. Rooted in the core principle of multimodality, the paper surfaces ways of doing/knowing which inevitably sit beside (next to) words, but which also sometimes exist besides (in spite of) words. The empirical stimulus for the paper is fieldwork conducted in Extremadura, Spain; here, in fields and factories, we find work that is highly accomplished and meticulously coordinated, but which for practical reasons is conducted almost entirely without speech – for hours on end. By privileging language work and “talk on the job”, discourse scholars not only misrecognize the complex semiotic organization of jobs but effectively sideline whole domains of working-class, manual labor. These matters thus have ethical and political ramifications as well as epistemological or methodological ones.","PeriodicalId":134431,"journal":{"name":"Multimodality & Society","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Working beside/s words: A case study in the partiality and provinciality of language\",\"authors\":\"Crispin Thurlow\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26349795231202250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Part visual essay, the case study reported here considers the classist implications of over-attending to (spoken) language in the workplace. Rooted in the core principle of multimodality, the paper surfaces ways of doing/knowing which inevitably sit beside (next to) words, but which also sometimes exist besides (in spite of) words. The empirical stimulus for the paper is fieldwork conducted in Extremadura, Spain; here, in fields and factories, we find work that is highly accomplished and meticulously coordinated, but which for practical reasons is conducted almost entirely without speech – for hours on end. By privileging language work and “talk on the job”, discourse scholars not only misrecognize the complex semiotic organization of jobs but effectively sideline whole domains of working-class, manual labor. These matters thus have ethical and political ramifications as well as epistemological or methodological ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multimodality & Society\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multimodality & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26349795231202250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multimodality & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26349795231202250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

部分视觉文章,这里报告的案例研究考虑了在工作场所过度关注(口语)语言的阶级含义。基于多模态的核心原则,这篇论文揭示了做事/认识的方式,这些方式不可避免地存在于单词旁边,但有时也存在于单词之外。本文的经验刺激是在西班牙埃斯特雷马杜拉进行的实地调查;在这里,在田野和工厂里,我们发现工作完成得很高,协调得很细致,但出于实际原因,这些工作几乎完全不需要讲话——连续几个小时。通过对语言工作和“工作谈话”的特权,话语学者不仅错误地认识了工作的复杂符号学组织,而且有效地将工人阶级体力劳动的整个领域边缘化。因此,这些问题具有伦理和政治的影响,以及认识论或方法论的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Working beside/s words: A case study in the partiality and provinciality of language
Part visual essay, the case study reported here considers the classist implications of over-attending to (spoken) language in the workplace. Rooted in the core principle of multimodality, the paper surfaces ways of doing/knowing which inevitably sit beside (next to) words, but which also sometimes exist besides (in spite of) words. The empirical stimulus for the paper is fieldwork conducted in Extremadura, Spain; here, in fields and factories, we find work that is highly accomplished and meticulously coordinated, but which for practical reasons is conducted almost entirely without speech – for hours on end. By privileging language work and “talk on the job”, discourse scholars not only misrecognize the complex semiotic organization of jobs but effectively sideline whole domains of working-class, manual labor. These matters thus have ethical and political ramifications as well as epistemological or methodological ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信