c.i.刘易斯的内涵语义学

IF 0.6 3区数学 Q2 LOGIC

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1215/00294527-2023-0006

Edwin Mares

{"title":"c.i.刘易斯的内涵语义学","authors":"Edwin Mares","doi":"10.1215/00294527-2023-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper begins with a discussion of C. I. Lewis’s theory of meaning in his book, An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation (1946) and his pragmatic theory of analyticity and necessity. I bring this theories together with some remarks that he makes in an appendix to the second edition of Symbolic Logic to construct an algebraic semantics for his logics S2 and S3. These logics and their semantics are compared and evaluated with regard to how well they implement Lewis’s theories of meaning and analyticity.","PeriodicalId":51259,"journal":{"name":"Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"C. I. Lewis’s Intensional Semantics\",\"authors\":\"Edwin Mares\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/00294527-2023-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper begins with a discussion of C. I. Lewis’s theory of meaning in his book, An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation (1946) and his pragmatic theory of analyticity and necessity. I bring this theories together with some remarks that he makes in an appendix to the second edition of Symbolic Logic to construct an algebraic semantics for his logics S2 and S3. These logics and their semantics are compared and evaluated with regard to how well they implement Lewis’s theories of meaning and analyticity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/00294527-2023-0006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00294527-2023-0006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文首先讨论了c.i.刘易斯在其著作《知识与价值的分析》(1946)中的意义理论及其分析性和必然性的语用理论。我将这些理论与他在《符号逻辑》第二版附录中的一些评论结合起来，为他的逻辑S2和S3构建一个代数语义。对这些逻辑和语义进行比较和评估，看它们在多大程度上实现了刘易斯的意义和分析理论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

C. I. Lewis’s Intensional Semantics

This paper begins with a discussion of C. I. Lewis’s theory of meaning in his book, An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation (1946) and his pragmatic theory of analyticity and necessity. I bring this theories together with some remarks that he makes in an appendix to the second edition of Symbolic Logic to construct an algebraic semantics for his logics S2 and S3. These logics and their semantics are compared and evaluated with regard to how well they implement Lewis’s theories of meaning and analyticity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic MATHEMATICS-LOGIC

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

14.30%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, founded in 1960, aims to publish high quality and original research papers in philosophical logic, mathematical logic, and related areas, including papers of compelling historical interest. The Journal is also willing to selectively publish expository articles on important current topics of interest as well as book reviews.