自由放任式叙事:约书亚·奥本海默纪录片《杀戮演绎》中的虚构、后事实和电影声音

IF 0.5 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
STYLE Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.5325/style.57.3.0296
Alexander Scherr
{"title":"自由放任式叙事:约书亚·奥本海默纪录片《杀戮演绎》中的虚构、后事实和电影声音","authors":"Alexander Scherr","doi":"10.5325/style.57.3.0296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Based on a rhetorical-narratological analysis of Joshua Oppenheimer’s film The Act of Killing (2012), this article identifies a specific use of the filmic voice which it defines as ‘laissez-faire storytelling.’ The laissez-faire voice is a rhetorical stance that serves documentary filmmakers to reconfigure their narrative position toward actors who espouse a ‘post-factual’ worldview. Directors who employ this stance strategically grant their actors a considerable amount of freedom in the making of the documentary. Ultimately, however, their technique exposes a problematic rhetoric in which the borderline between fictionality and non-fictionality is obliterated. The article concludes that the laissez-faire documentary resonates strongly with current attempts in both theory and art to restabilize the precarious boundaries between fictionality and non-fictionality—a reorientation that is decidedly ‘post-postmodernist.’","PeriodicalId":45300,"journal":{"name":"STYLE","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laissez-Faire Storytelling: Fictionality, Post-Factuality, and the Filmic Voice in Joshua Oppenheimer’s Documentary <i>The Act of Killing</i> (2012)\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Scherr\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/style.57.3.0296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Based on a rhetorical-narratological analysis of Joshua Oppenheimer’s film The Act of Killing (2012), this article identifies a specific use of the filmic voice which it defines as ‘laissez-faire storytelling.’ The laissez-faire voice is a rhetorical stance that serves documentary filmmakers to reconfigure their narrative position toward actors who espouse a ‘post-factual’ worldview. Directors who employ this stance strategically grant their actors a considerable amount of freedom in the making of the documentary. Ultimately, however, their technique exposes a problematic rhetoric in which the borderline between fictionality and non-fictionality is obliterated. The article concludes that the laissez-faire documentary resonates strongly with current attempts in both theory and art to restabilize the precarious boundaries between fictionality and non-fictionality—a reorientation that is decidedly ‘post-postmodernist.’\",\"PeriodicalId\":45300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STYLE\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STYLE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/style.57.3.0296\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STYLE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/style.57.3.0296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文通过对约书亚·奥本海默的电影《杀戮演绎》(2012)的修辞学-叙事学分析,确定了电影声音的一种具体用法,并将其定义为“自由放任式叙事”。这种自由放任的声音是一种修辞立场,可以帮助纪录片制片人重新配置他们对支持“后事实”世界观的演员的叙事立场。采用这种策略的导演在纪录片的制作过程中给予演员相当大的自由。然而,最终,他们的技巧暴露了一种有问题的修辞,在这种修辞中,虚构与非虚构之间的界限被抹去了。文章的结论是,这部自由放任的纪录片与当前理论和艺术中重新稳定虚构与非虚构之间不稳定界限的尝试产生了强烈的共鸣——这种重新定位无疑是“后后现代主义”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laissez-Faire Storytelling: Fictionality, Post-Factuality, and the Filmic Voice in Joshua Oppenheimer’s Documentary The Act of Killing (2012)
ABSTRACT Based on a rhetorical-narratological analysis of Joshua Oppenheimer’s film The Act of Killing (2012), this article identifies a specific use of the filmic voice which it defines as ‘laissez-faire storytelling.’ The laissez-faire voice is a rhetorical stance that serves documentary filmmakers to reconfigure their narrative position toward actors who espouse a ‘post-factual’ worldview. Directors who employ this stance strategically grant their actors a considerable amount of freedom in the making of the documentary. Ultimately, however, their technique exposes a problematic rhetoric in which the borderline between fictionality and non-fictionality is obliterated. The article concludes that the laissez-faire documentary resonates strongly with current attempts in both theory and art to restabilize the precarious boundaries between fictionality and non-fictionality—a reorientation that is decidedly ‘post-postmodernist.’
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
STYLE
STYLE Multiple-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Style invites submissions that address questions of style, stylistics, and poetics, including research and theory in discourse analysis, literary and nonliterary genres, narrative, figuration, metrics, rhetorical analysis, and the pedagogy of style. Contributions may draw from such fields as literary criticism, critical theory, computational linguistics, cognitive linguistics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric and writing studies. In addition, Style publishes reviews, review-essays, surveys, interviews, translations, enumerative and annotated bibliographies, and reports on conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信