编辑注释

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
Steve Ruddock
{"title":"编辑注释","authors":"Steve Ruddock","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2023.29077.editorial","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 4 Notes from the EditorFree AccessNotes from the EditorSteve RuddockSteve RuddockSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:15 May 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29077.editorialAboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail With the release of the UK White Paper and the ongoing debate over sports betting advertisements in the U.S., the remainder of 2023 will likely be spent discussing responsible gambling policies. That should be a positive development, but considering the current debates raging, I fear the end result is an industry no closer to making a dent in problem gambling than it is today.So far as I can tell, the plan is to throw more money at the problem and rush through untested policies being hatched in a problem gambling bubble. Many of the ideas being peddled merely nibble around the edges and feel more like semantic arguments than actual solutions. If we look ahead ten years, will prohibiting “risk-free” or “can't lose” verbiage be a difference-maker? Will sterilizing how we talk about the subject—a “person experiencing gambling disorder” instead of a “problem gambler”—change the percentage or severity of gambling addiction? Is unsolicited outreach a beneficial policy?If these were headlines, applying Betteridge's Law seems appropriate.Increased funding and awareness are long overdue, but consumers deserve more than new academic terms, checking boxes, and knee-jerk policy decisions with the potential for severe, long-lasting implications that can be difficult to reverse.The recent successes on the responsible and problem gambling fronts read like a wish list from 1997. While the increases in research and available data are good, I often wonder if anyone truly understands what the data is saying, or even more worrisome, if it is saying anything at all.This is a topic I hope to discuss in upcoming issues.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 4May 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Steve Ruddock.Notes from the Editor.Gaming Law Review.May 2023.163-163.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29077.editorialPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 4: May 15, 2023PDF download","PeriodicalId":44210,"journal":{"name":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Notes from the Editor\",\"authors\":\"Steve Ruddock\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/glr2.2023.29077.editorial\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 4 Notes from the EditorFree AccessNotes from the EditorSteve RuddockSteve RuddockSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:15 May 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29077.editorialAboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail With the release of the UK White Paper and the ongoing debate over sports betting advertisements in the U.S., the remainder of 2023 will likely be spent discussing responsible gambling policies. That should be a positive development, but considering the current debates raging, I fear the end result is an industry no closer to making a dent in problem gambling than it is today.So far as I can tell, the plan is to throw more money at the problem and rush through untested policies being hatched in a problem gambling bubble. Many of the ideas being peddled merely nibble around the edges and feel more like semantic arguments than actual solutions. If we look ahead ten years, will prohibiting “risk-free” or “can't lose” verbiage be a difference-maker? Will sterilizing how we talk about the subject—a “person experiencing gambling disorder” instead of a “problem gambler”—change the percentage or severity of gambling addiction? Is unsolicited outreach a beneficial policy?If these were headlines, applying Betteridge's Law seems appropriate.Increased funding and awareness are long overdue, but consumers deserve more than new academic terms, checking boxes, and knee-jerk policy decisions with the potential for severe, long-lasting implications that can be difficult to reverse.The recent successes on the responsible and problem gambling fronts read like a wish list from 1997. While the increases in research and available data are good, I often wonder if anyone truly understands what the data is saying, or even more worrisome, if it is saying anything at all.This is a topic I hope to discuss in upcoming issues.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 4May 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Steve Ruddock.Notes from the Editor.Gaming Law Review.May 2023.163-163.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29077.editorialPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 4: May 15, 2023PDF download\",\"PeriodicalId\":44210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29077.editorial\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29077.editorial","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

博彩法律评论卷。27、No. 4编辑注释免费访问编辑注释steve RuddockSteve ruddock本文作者搜索更多论文发布在线:2023年5月15日https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29077.editorialAboutSectionsPDF/EPUB权限和引文missionsdownload CitationsTrack引文添加到收藏返回出版分享分享在facebook上推特链接InRedditEmail随着英国白皮书的发布和美国体育博彩广告的持续争论,2023年剩下的时间可能会用来讨论负责任的赌博政策。这应该是一个积极的发展,但考虑到目前的激烈争论,我担心最终的结果是一个行业不会比今天更接近于减少问题赌博。据我所知,该计划是为了解决这个问题而投入更多资金,并匆忙通过在问题赌博泡沫中酝酿的未经检验的政策。许多被兜售的想法只是在边缘啃咬,感觉更像是语义上的争论,而不是实际的解决方案。如果我们展望未来十年,禁止使用“无风险”或“不能输”的措辞会带来改变吗?把我们谈论这个话题的方式改成“有赌博障碍的人”而不是“有问题的赌徒”,会改变赌博成瘾的比例或严重程度吗?主动外展是一项有益的政策吗?如果这些都是头条新闻,那么应用贝特里奇定律似乎是合适的。增加资金和意识是姗姗来迟的,但消费者应该得到的不仅仅是新的学术术语、复选框和条件反射式的政策决定,这些政策可能会产生严重而持久的影响,而且很难逆转。最近在负责任和问题赌博方面取得的成功读起来就像1997年的愿望清单。虽然研究和可用数据的增加是好事,但我经常怀疑是否有人真正理解数据在说什么,或者更令人担忧的是,它是否真的在说什么。这是我希望在接下来的问题中讨论的话题。数据参考资料相关信息第27卷第4期2023年5月信息版权所有2023,Mary Ann Liebert, Inc,出版商引用本文:Steve Ruddock。编辑注释。博彩法律评论。2023.5月163-163.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29077.editorialPublished卷:27第4期:2023年5月15日pdf下载
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Notes from the Editor
Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 4 Notes from the EditorFree AccessNotes from the EditorSteve RuddockSteve RuddockSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:15 May 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29077.editorialAboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail With the release of the UK White Paper and the ongoing debate over sports betting advertisements in the U.S., the remainder of 2023 will likely be spent discussing responsible gambling policies. That should be a positive development, but considering the current debates raging, I fear the end result is an industry no closer to making a dent in problem gambling than it is today.So far as I can tell, the plan is to throw more money at the problem and rush through untested policies being hatched in a problem gambling bubble. Many of the ideas being peddled merely nibble around the edges and feel more like semantic arguments than actual solutions. If we look ahead ten years, will prohibiting “risk-free” or “can't lose” verbiage be a difference-maker? Will sterilizing how we talk about the subject—a “person experiencing gambling disorder” instead of a “problem gambler”—change the percentage or severity of gambling addiction? Is unsolicited outreach a beneficial policy?If these were headlines, applying Betteridge's Law seems appropriate.Increased funding and awareness are long overdue, but consumers deserve more than new academic terms, checking boxes, and knee-jerk policy decisions with the potential for severe, long-lasting implications that can be difficult to reverse.The recent successes on the responsible and problem gambling fronts read like a wish list from 1997. While the increases in research and available data are good, I often wonder if anyone truly understands what the data is saying, or even more worrisome, if it is saying anything at all.This is a topic I hope to discuss in upcoming issues.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 4May 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Steve Ruddock.Notes from the Editor.Gaming Law Review.May 2023.163-163.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29077.editorialPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 4: May 15, 2023PDF download
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信