基于大规模地铁智能卡数据的出行时间和需求预测方法

Q2 Engineering
Iyad Zimmo, Daniel Hörcher, Ramandeep Singh, Daniel J. Graham
{"title":"基于大规模地铁智能卡数据的出行时间和需求预测方法","authors":"Iyad Zimmo, Daniel Hörcher, Ramandeep Singh, Daniel J. Graham","doi":"10.3311/pptr.22252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban mass transit systems generate large volumes of data via automated systems established for ticketing, signalling, and other operational processes. This study is motivated by the observation that despite the availability of sophisticated quantitative methods, most public transport operators are constrained in exploiting the information their datasets contain. This paper intends to address this gap in the context of real-time demand and travel time prediction with smart card data. We comparatively benchmark the predictive performance of four quantitative prediction methods: multivariate linear regression (MVLR) and semiparametric regression (SPR) widely used in the econometric literature, and random forest regression (RFR) and support vector machine regression (SVMR) from machine learning. We find that the SVMR and RFR methods are the most accurate in travel flow and travel time prediction, respectively. However, we also find that the SPR technique offers lower computation time at the expense of minor inefficiency in predictive power in comparison with the two machine learning methods.","PeriodicalId":39536,"journal":{"name":"Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering","volume":"17 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking Travel Time and Demand Prediction Methods Using Large-scale Metro Smart Card Data\",\"authors\":\"Iyad Zimmo, Daniel Hörcher, Ramandeep Singh, Daniel J. Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.3311/pptr.22252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Urban mass transit systems generate large volumes of data via automated systems established for ticketing, signalling, and other operational processes. This study is motivated by the observation that despite the availability of sophisticated quantitative methods, most public transport operators are constrained in exploiting the information their datasets contain. This paper intends to address this gap in the context of real-time demand and travel time prediction with smart card data. We comparatively benchmark the predictive performance of four quantitative prediction methods: multivariate linear regression (MVLR) and semiparametric regression (SPR) widely used in the econometric literature, and random forest regression (RFR) and support vector machine regression (SVMR) from machine learning. We find that the SVMR and RFR methods are the most accurate in travel flow and travel time prediction, respectively. However, we also find that the SPR technique offers lower computation time at the expense of minor inefficiency in predictive power in comparison with the two machine learning methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering\",\"volume\":\"17 7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3311/pptr.22252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3311/pptr.22252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市轨道交通系统通过为票务、信号和其他操作过程建立的自动化系统产生大量数据。本研究的动机是观察到,尽管有复杂的定量方法,但大多数公共交通运营商在利用其数据集包含的信息方面受到限制。本文旨在利用智能卡数据解决实时需求和出行时间预测的问题。我们比较了计量经济学文献中广泛使用的多元线性回归(MVLR)和半参数回归(SPR)以及机器学习中的随机森林回归(RFR)和支持向量机回归(SVMR)四种定量预测方法的预测性能。研究发现,SVMR和RFR方法分别在出行流量和出行时间预测中最准确。然而,我们也发现,与两种机器学习方法相比,SPR技术提供了更低的计算时间,但代价是预测能力的低效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benchmarking Travel Time and Demand Prediction Methods Using Large-scale Metro Smart Card Data
Urban mass transit systems generate large volumes of data via automated systems established for ticketing, signalling, and other operational processes. This study is motivated by the observation that despite the availability of sophisticated quantitative methods, most public transport operators are constrained in exploiting the information their datasets contain. This paper intends to address this gap in the context of real-time demand and travel time prediction with smart card data. We comparatively benchmark the predictive performance of four quantitative prediction methods: multivariate linear regression (MVLR) and semiparametric regression (SPR) widely used in the econometric literature, and random forest regression (RFR) and support vector machine regression (SVMR) from machine learning. We find that the SVMR and RFR methods are the most accurate in travel flow and travel time prediction, respectively. However, we also find that the SPR technique offers lower computation time at the expense of minor inefficiency in predictive power in comparison with the two machine learning methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering
Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Periodica Polytechnica is a publisher of the Budapest University of Technology and Economics. It publishes seven international journals (Architecture, Chemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Social and Management Sciences, Transportation Engineering). The journals have free electronic versions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信