Shomaila Hassan Khan, Misbah Bin Ilyas, Jawad Ali, Zahid Mehmood, Raheela Kanwal, Arooba Sajjad, Kiran Khushnood
{"title":"静态与动态拉伸;对非运动员体能表现的短期影响——一项随机临床试验","authors":"Shomaila Hassan Khan, Misbah Bin Ilyas, Jawad Ali, Zahid Mehmood, Raheela Kanwal, Arooba Sajjad, Kiran Khushnood","doi":"10.52567/trehabj.v7i03.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Non-athletes have varying fitness levels, muscle characteristics, and training backgrounds, which can affect how different types of stretching exercises impact their physical performance. Objective: to compare the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on physical performance of non-athletes. A single-blinded, cross-over, randomized clinical trial was conducted at Iqra National University, Peshawar for a period of 6 months. A total of n=54 male participants were randomly allocated into group A and B. Group A performed the static stretching while group B performed dynamic stretching. The physical performance measure was endurance, agility, strength, flexibility, and balance respectively. Result: The result of two-way RMANOVA showed that both stretches had significant interaction effects between interventions and all performance measures (p<0.001) except for balance (p=0.23). The main effect showed that static stretching significantly reduced agility and balance (p<0.05), while dynamic balance improved all measures significantly (p<0.05). When comparing the mean differences of all variables, dynamic stretches showed significant improvement (p<0.05) in all variables as compared to static stretching. Conclusion: Dynamic stretch has a significant contribution to improving all physical performance measures among non-athletes if incorporated before the activity. While static stretching negatively affects the agility and balance among this population. (NCT05053490) Keywords: agility; balance; dynamic stretching; endurance; flexibility; non-athletes; physical performance; static stretching.","PeriodicalId":90985,"journal":{"name":"The open rehabilitation journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Static versus dynamic stretching; short term effects on physical performance in non-athletes- a randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Shomaila Hassan Khan, Misbah Bin Ilyas, Jawad Ali, Zahid Mehmood, Raheela Kanwal, Arooba Sajjad, Kiran Khushnood\",\"doi\":\"10.52567/trehabj.v7i03.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Non-athletes have varying fitness levels, muscle characteristics, and training backgrounds, which can affect how different types of stretching exercises impact their physical performance. Objective: to compare the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on physical performance of non-athletes. A single-blinded, cross-over, randomized clinical trial was conducted at Iqra National University, Peshawar for a period of 6 months. A total of n=54 male participants were randomly allocated into group A and B. Group A performed the static stretching while group B performed dynamic stretching. The physical performance measure was endurance, agility, strength, flexibility, and balance respectively. Result: The result of two-way RMANOVA showed that both stretches had significant interaction effects between interventions and all performance measures (p<0.001) except for balance (p=0.23). The main effect showed that static stretching significantly reduced agility and balance (p<0.05), while dynamic balance improved all measures significantly (p<0.05). When comparing the mean differences of all variables, dynamic stretches showed significant improvement (p<0.05) in all variables as compared to static stretching. Conclusion: Dynamic stretch has a significant contribution to improving all physical performance measures among non-athletes if incorporated before the activity. While static stretching negatively affects the agility and balance among this population. (NCT05053490) Keywords: agility; balance; dynamic stretching; endurance; flexibility; non-athletes; physical performance; static stretching.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open rehabilitation journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open rehabilitation journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52567/trehabj.v7i03.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open rehabilitation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52567/trehabj.v7i03.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Static versus dynamic stretching; short term effects on physical performance in non-athletes- a randomized clinical trial
Background: Non-athletes have varying fitness levels, muscle characteristics, and training backgrounds, which can affect how different types of stretching exercises impact their physical performance. Objective: to compare the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on physical performance of non-athletes. A single-blinded, cross-over, randomized clinical trial was conducted at Iqra National University, Peshawar for a period of 6 months. A total of n=54 male participants were randomly allocated into group A and B. Group A performed the static stretching while group B performed dynamic stretching. The physical performance measure was endurance, agility, strength, flexibility, and balance respectively. Result: The result of two-way RMANOVA showed that both stretches had significant interaction effects between interventions and all performance measures (p<0.001) except for balance (p=0.23). The main effect showed that static stretching significantly reduced agility and balance (p<0.05), while dynamic balance improved all measures significantly (p<0.05). When comparing the mean differences of all variables, dynamic stretches showed significant improvement (p<0.05) in all variables as compared to static stretching. Conclusion: Dynamic stretch has a significant contribution to improving all physical performance measures among non-athletes if incorporated before the activity. While static stretching negatively affects the agility and balance among this population. (NCT05053490) Keywords: agility; balance; dynamic stretching; endurance; flexibility; non-athletes; physical performance; static stretching.