欧洲标准规定了案件当事人在民事诉讼中适用强制措施的权利及其在乌克兰的实施

IF 0.7 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
DOMINIKA ROSŁOŃ, DANYLO LUKIANCHENKO, SERHII ZLENKO, OLEKSANDR KULIBABA, OLEKSANDR AKIMOV, LIUDMYLA AKIMOVA
{"title":"欧洲标准规定了案件当事人在民事诉讼中适用强制措施的权利及其在乌克兰的实施","authors":"DOMINIKA ROSŁOŃ, DANYLO LUKIANCHENKO, SERHII ZLENKO, OLEKSANDR KULIBABA, OLEKSANDR AKIMOV, LIUDMYLA AKIMOVA","doi":"10.33543/j.130237.1221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the problems of applying in practice the civil procedural institution of securing a claim, the possibility of its extension to a wide range of circumstances. The grounds for interim measures satisfied by the court, as well as the issues of proving the need for their application in Ukraine and the EU countries, are highlighted. It is shown that although the institution of securing a claim contributes to the creation of optimal conditions for the real protection of the rights and legitimate interests of persons in civil proceedings, and namely the institution of securing a claim acts as a guarantee of the execution of a court decision, one cannot consider the meaning and essence of the definition of “interim measures” separately from such a fundamental concept as “a measure (form) of state coercion”, and the proportionality of the type of security is aimed mainly at protecting the rights of persons against whom measures are taken to secure a claim. The powers of the court to secure a claim in the civil process of Ukraine and the EU are considered, the current doctrinal provisions regarding the grounds and procedural order for securing a claim are analyzed, attention is focused on the essence of the discretionary powers of the court when taking measures to secure a claim. It is concluded that the application of measures to secure a claim should take place if there are grounds for this and justifications for the specified circumstances, taking into account the judicial practice of the EU countries as part of the need for judicial reform in Ukraine in the direction of ensuring its compliance with EU standards for potential member states.","PeriodicalId":44821,"journal":{"name":"AD ALTA-Journal of Interdisciplinary Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EUROPEAN STANDARDS OF THE RIGHTS OF THE PARTIES TO THE CASE IN THE APPLICATION OF CIVIL ACTION ENFORCEMENT MEASURES AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION IN UKRAINE\",\"authors\":\"DOMINIKA ROSŁOŃ, DANYLO LUKIANCHENKO, SERHII ZLENKO, OLEKSANDR KULIBABA, OLEKSANDR AKIMOV, LIUDMYLA AKIMOVA\",\"doi\":\"10.33543/j.130237.1221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the problems of applying in practice the civil procedural institution of securing a claim, the possibility of its extension to a wide range of circumstances. The grounds for interim measures satisfied by the court, as well as the issues of proving the need for their application in Ukraine and the EU countries, are highlighted. It is shown that although the institution of securing a claim contributes to the creation of optimal conditions for the real protection of the rights and legitimate interests of persons in civil proceedings, and namely the institution of securing a claim acts as a guarantee of the execution of a court decision, one cannot consider the meaning and essence of the definition of “interim measures” separately from such a fundamental concept as “a measure (form) of state coercion”, and the proportionality of the type of security is aimed mainly at protecting the rights of persons against whom measures are taken to secure a claim. The powers of the court to secure a claim in the civil process of Ukraine and the EU are considered, the current doctrinal provisions regarding the grounds and procedural order for securing a claim are analyzed, attention is focused on the essence of the discretionary powers of the court when taking measures to secure a claim. It is concluded that the application of measures to secure a claim should take place if there are grounds for this and justifications for the specified circumstances, taking into account the judicial practice of the EU countries as part of the need for judicial reform in Ukraine in the direction of ensuring its compliance with EU standards for potential member states.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AD ALTA-Journal of Interdisciplinary Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AD ALTA-Journal of Interdisciplinary Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33543/j.130237.1221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AD ALTA-Journal of Interdisciplinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33543/j.130237.1221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了民事诉讼求偿制度在实践中适用的问题,以及将其推广到广泛情形的可能性。强调了法院满足临时措施的理由,以及证明在乌克兰和欧盟国家适用这些措施的必要性的问题。本文认为,尽管请求保全制度有助于为民事诉讼中人的权利和合法利益的真正保护创造最佳条件,即请求保全制度作为法院判决执行的保证,但人们不能脱离“国家强制措施(形式)”这样的基本概念来考虑“临时措施”定义的意义和本质。担保类型的相称性主要是为了保护被采取措施以确保索赔的人的权利。本文考虑了法院在乌克兰和欧盟民事诉讼程序中确保索赔的权力,分析了目前关于确保索赔的理由和程序顺序的理论规定,重点关注法院在采取措施确保索赔时的自由裁量权的本质。结论是,如果有理由和特定情况的理由,应考虑到欧盟国家的司法实践,作为乌克兰司法改革需要的一部分,以确保其符合欧盟对潜在成员国的标准,则应采取措施以确保索赔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EUROPEAN STANDARDS OF THE RIGHTS OF THE PARTIES TO THE CASE IN THE APPLICATION OF CIVIL ACTION ENFORCEMENT MEASURES AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION IN UKRAINE
The article deals with the problems of applying in practice the civil procedural institution of securing a claim, the possibility of its extension to a wide range of circumstances. The grounds for interim measures satisfied by the court, as well as the issues of proving the need for their application in Ukraine and the EU countries, are highlighted. It is shown that although the institution of securing a claim contributes to the creation of optimal conditions for the real protection of the rights and legitimate interests of persons in civil proceedings, and namely the institution of securing a claim acts as a guarantee of the execution of a court decision, one cannot consider the meaning and essence of the definition of “interim measures” separately from such a fundamental concept as “a measure (form) of state coercion”, and the proportionality of the type of security is aimed mainly at protecting the rights of persons against whom measures are taken to secure a claim. The powers of the court to secure a claim in the civil process of Ukraine and the EU are considered, the current doctrinal provisions regarding the grounds and procedural order for securing a claim are analyzed, attention is focused on the essence of the discretionary powers of the court when taking measures to secure a claim. It is concluded that the application of measures to secure a claim should take place if there are grounds for this and justifications for the specified circumstances, taking into account the judicial practice of the EU countries as part of the need for judicial reform in Ukraine in the direction of ensuring its compliance with EU standards for potential member states.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AD ALTA-Journal of Interdisciplinary Research
AD ALTA-Journal of Interdisciplinary Research MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
71.40%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信