基于探究性问题方法的生成学习模型在静态流体学习中的实现

Elvira Hendini, Akmam Akmam, Gusnedi Gusnedi, Putri Dwi Sundari
{"title":"基于探究性问题方法的生成学习模型在静态流体学习中的实现","authors":"Elvira Hendini, Akmam Akmam, Gusnedi Gusnedi, Putri Dwi Sundari","doi":"10.24036/ple.v1i3.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learners who cannot connect the new knowledge received with previous knowledge will find it difficult to understand learning, causing low learning outcomes. The solution offered is to apply a generative learning model with the probing question method. The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of applying a generative learning model with probing question method on the learning outcomes of students in Static Fluid material class XI SMAN 14 Padang. The type of research is Quasi Experimental.  The study population was all students of class XI MIPA. Sampling using purposive sampling technique. The research sample is XI MIPA 4 class as an experimental class and XI MIPA 5 class as a control class. A written page in the shape of an objective serves as the tool. The findings revealed a substantial contrast between classes using PBL learning models with probing question techniques and classes using generative learning models with these techniques in terms of the learning outcomes of the students. When compared to the control class, the experimental class's average learning outcomes were 81, while it was 78.4. At a significant threshold of alpha = 0.05, it was determined that tcount = 8.704 and ttable = 1.995 based on the equality test of the two averages. If ttable< tcount, then H0 must be disregarded. The significance of tcount lies in the rejection of H0 and acceptance of H1, which demonstrate that the generative learning model with the probing question method has a beneficial impact on learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":302556,"journal":{"name":"Physics Learning and Education","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of Generative Learning Models with Probing Question Methods in Static Fluid Learning\",\"authors\":\"Elvira Hendini, Akmam Akmam, Gusnedi Gusnedi, Putri Dwi Sundari\",\"doi\":\"10.24036/ple.v1i3.85\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learners who cannot connect the new knowledge received with previous knowledge will find it difficult to understand learning, causing low learning outcomes. The solution offered is to apply a generative learning model with the probing question method. The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of applying a generative learning model with probing question method on the learning outcomes of students in Static Fluid material class XI SMAN 14 Padang. The type of research is Quasi Experimental.  The study population was all students of class XI MIPA. Sampling using purposive sampling technique. The research sample is XI MIPA 4 class as an experimental class and XI MIPA 5 class as a control class. A written page in the shape of an objective serves as the tool. The findings revealed a substantial contrast between classes using PBL learning models with probing question techniques and classes using generative learning models with these techniques in terms of the learning outcomes of the students. When compared to the control class, the experimental class's average learning outcomes were 81, while it was 78.4. At a significant threshold of alpha = 0.05, it was determined that tcount = 8.704 and ttable = 1.995 based on the equality test of the two averages. If ttable< tcount, then H0 must be disregarded. The significance of tcount lies in the rejection of H0 and acceptance of H1, which demonstrate that the generative learning model with the probing question method has a beneficial impact on learning outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics Learning and Education\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics Learning and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v1i3.85\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics Learning and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v1i3.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

如果学习者不能将所学到的新知识与之前的知识联系起来,就很难理解学习,导致学习效果不佳。提出的解决方案是采用探索性问题法的生成学习模型。研究类型为准实验。使用有目的抽样技术进行抽样。目标形状的书写页可以作为工具。研究结果显示,在学生的学习成果方面,使用带有探究性问题技术的PBL学习模式的班级和使用带有这些技术的生成式学习模式的班级之间存在显著差异。与对照组相比,实验班的平均学习成绩为81分,而对照组的平均学习成绩为78.4分。在alpha = 0.05的显著性阈值下,根据两个平均值的相等性检验,确定tcount = 8.704, ttable = 1.995。如果ttable<计算,那么H0必须被忽略。tcount的意义在于拒绝H0,接受H1,这表明采用探究性问题方法的生成式学习模型对学习结果有有益的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of Generative Learning Models with Probing Question Methods in Static Fluid Learning
Learners who cannot connect the new knowledge received with previous knowledge will find it difficult to understand learning, causing low learning outcomes. The solution offered is to apply a generative learning model with the probing question method. The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of applying a generative learning model with probing question method on the learning outcomes of students in Static Fluid material class XI SMAN 14 Padang. The type of research is Quasi Experimental.  The study population was all students of class XI MIPA. Sampling using purposive sampling technique. The research sample is XI MIPA 4 class as an experimental class and XI MIPA 5 class as a control class. A written page in the shape of an objective serves as the tool. The findings revealed a substantial contrast between classes using PBL learning models with probing question techniques and classes using generative learning models with these techniques in terms of the learning outcomes of the students. When compared to the control class, the experimental class's average learning outcomes were 81, while it was 78.4. At a significant threshold of alpha = 0.05, it was determined that tcount = 8.704 and ttable = 1.995 based on the equality test of the two averages. If ttable< tcount, then H0 must be disregarded. The significance of tcount lies in the rejection of H0 and acceptance of H1, which demonstrate that the generative learning model with the probing question method has a beneficial impact on learning outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信