12、14、16次核心前列腺活检检测前列腺癌的比较研究

Suleyman Sagır, Muslum Ergun
{"title":"12、14、16次核心前列腺活检检测前列腺癌的比较研究","authors":"Suleyman Sagır, Muslum Ergun","doi":"10.54393/pbmj.v6i09.912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men and early detection is vital for effective treatment. The traditional method for diagnosis includes the use of prostate biopsies, where a needle is used to extract tissue samples from the prostate gland to be analyzed for cancerous cells. Objective: To evaluate and compare the diagnosis rates of benign, malign, and intermediate conditions in patients subjected to 12-core, 14-core, and 16-core biopsy techniques. Methods: The retrospective study was conducted on patients who visited our clinic and underwent prostate biopsy between the years 2013 and 2021. This study revolved around a careful comparative examination of the diagnostic outcomes from three different prostate biopsy techniques – 12-core, 14-core, and 16-core biopsy. Reults: The findings indicated that there were no notable variations in age or PSA levels among the groups. The 12-core group showed 44.8% benign, 17.8% malign, and 37.4% borderline cases. The 14-core group revealed 43.1% benign, 31.4% malign, and 25.5% borderline cases. The 16-core group had 32% benign, 42.7% malign, and 25.2% borderline cases (p<0.001). Conclusions: The 16-core biopsy yielded the highest malignancy detection.","PeriodicalId":19844,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan BioMedical Journal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of 12, 14 And 16 Core Prostate Biopsies in Detecting Prostate Cancer in Patients: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"Suleyman Sagır, Muslum Ergun\",\"doi\":\"10.54393/pbmj.v6i09.912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men and early detection is vital for effective treatment. The traditional method for diagnosis includes the use of prostate biopsies, where a needle is used to extract tissue samples from the prostate gland to be analyzed for cancerous cells. Objective: To evaluate and compare the diagnosis rates of benign, malign, and intermediate conditions in patients subjected to 12-core, 14-core, and 16-core biopsy techniques. Methods: The retrospective study was conducted on patients who visited our clinic and underwent prostate biopsy between the years 2013 and 2021. This study revolved around a careful comparative examination of the diagnostic outcomes from three different prostate biopsy techniques – 12-core, 14-core, and 16-core biopsy. Reults: The findings indicated that there were no notable variations in age or PSA levels among the groups. The 12-core group showed 44.8% benign, 17.8% malign, and 37.4% borderline cases. The 14-core group revealed 43.1% benign, 31.4% malign, and 25.5% borderline cases. The 16-core group had 32% benign, 42.7% malign, and 25.2% borderline cases (p<0.001). Conclusions: The 16-core biopsy yielded the highest malignancy detection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan BioMedical Journal\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan BioMedical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v6i09.912\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan BioMedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v6i09.912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前列腺癌是男性最常见的癌症之一,早期发现对有效治疗至关重要。传统的诊断方法包括使用前列腺活组织检查,即用针从前列腺中提取组织样本进行癌细胞分析。目的:评价和比较12核、14核和16核活检技术对良性、恶性和中度病变的诊断率。方法:回顾性研究2013年至2021年间来我院就诊并行前列腺活检的患者。本研究对三种不同的前列腺活检技术(12核、14核和16核)的诊断结果进行了仔细的比较检查。结果:研究结果表明,各组之间年龄和PSA水平无显著差异。12核组44.8%为良性,17.8%为恶性,37.4%为交界性。14核组显示43.1%为良性,31.4%为恶性,25.5%为边缘性。16核组32%为良性,42.7%为恶性,25.2%为边缘性(p<0.001)。结论:16核活检的恶性肿瘤检出率最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of 12, 14 And 16 Core Prostate Biopsies in Detecting Prostate Cancer in Patients: A Comparative Study
Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men and early detection is vital for effective treatment. The traditional method for diagnosis includes the use of prostate biopsies, where a needle is used to extract tissue samples from the prostate gland to be analyzed for cancerous cells. Objective: To evaluate and compare the diagnosis rates of benign, malign, and intermediate conditions in patients subjected to 12-core, 14-core, and 16-core biopsy techniques. Methods: The retrospective study was conducted on patients who visited our clinic and underwent prostate biopsy between the years 2013 and 2021. This study revolved around a careful comparative examination of the diagnostic outcomes from three different prostate biopsy techniques – 12-core, 14-core, and 16-core biopsy. Reults: The findings indicated that there were no notable variations in age or PSA levels among the groups. The 12-core group showed 44.8% benign, 17.8% malign, and 37.4% borderline cases. The 14-core group revealed 43.1% benign, 31.4% malign, and 25.5% borderline cases. The 16-core group had 32% benign, 42.7% malign, and 25.2% borderline cases (p<0.001). Conclusions: The 16-core biopsy yielded the highest malignancy detection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信