在美国,有争议的食品银行政治

Joshua Lohnes
{"title":"在美国,有争议的食品银行政治","authors":"Joshua Lohnes","doi":"10.1080/15528014.2023.2274701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTRising out of the devolution of public services to private actors during the Reagan administration, the food banking economy in the United States is now a multi-billion-dollar industry. The social and political movements that institutionalized charitable food networks are diverse and often contradictory, offering a window into the politics and competing interests of a U.S. food system that has long grappled with glaring contradictions between food waste and hunger. In this paper, I analyze shifting moral economies of hunger relief within a diverse social movement (re)negotiating a set of legal codes and social norms established over the past forty years of hunger relief through charity. I argue that charitable food networks offer a window into the political contest currently unfolding over the future of the U.S. food system. As such, the debates within these spaces are critical to understand the broader politics of food provisioning in the United States.KEYWORDS: Hungercharityfood policyfood justiceemergency foodfood banksactivism AcknowledgmentsI would like to thank anti-hunger and community food security advocates in West Virginia with whom I have worked for the past 10 years and members of the Global Solidarity Alliance for Food Health and Social Justice who have helped me to articulate these thoughts over the past 3. This paper first appeared in a special issue of Politique Américaine and I would like to thank Alice Béja and that editorial team for shaping this paper for a francophone audience. I am also grateful to the two anonymous reviewers of this journal whose comments significantly improved this final version.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2023.2274701Notes1. Food banks tend to go through recurrent periods of growing pains and instability. These organizations are not always in a position of financial fragility, the past few years in fact have seen a period of capital investments into the expansion of the network. Many of the local partners do remain at risk of shutting their doors due to financial difficulties, labor shortages or other concerns. Some FA food banks remain extremely under resourced in comparison to their network peers, particularly those in large US cities whose financial clout and material imprint on food and logistics networks in their service areas continues to expand.2. Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act (62 Stat.1070; 15 U.S.C. 714). The CCC continues to be a key instrument in the function of the contemporary food system in the United States, the food banking economy is one of the beneficiaries, but it also serves many other roles in child nutrition programs, and the distribution of international food aid for example.3. Foodchain operated 150 programs across the country that recovered hot, prepared foods from catered events and restaurants for redistribution to charities. Up to that point, Second Harvest concentrated almost exclusively on securing nonperishable goods for its food bank networks and benefited from the institutional expertise and infrastructure that accompanied the merger.4. Personal Interview – Feeding America director of retail partnerships interview – April 23rd, 2015.5. Personal Interview – Feeding America product sourcing manager – May 10th, 2016.6. Funding for TEFAP bonus commodity purchases are made possible through section 32 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act which mandates that 30% of all import duties collected from customs receipts are made available to the Secretary of Agriculture for surplus removal and the encouragement of domestic food consumption. When tariffs on steel and aluminum (or any other goods) increase, the pot of money to rescue farmers from food waste crises also increases.7. Facing Hunger Food Bank Agency Meeting. November 10th, 2015.8. ibid.9. Facing Hunger CEO Interview. May 14th, 2014.10. Interview Huntington City Mission. July 15th, 2014.11. Mountaineer Food Bank Product Sourcing Manager interview. July 18th, 2016.12. Facing Hunger CEO Interview. May 14th, 2014.13. Participant Observation at Mountaineer Food Bank Hunger Summit. August 8th, 2017.14. Participant Observation at Food for Preston meeting. May 18th, 2015.15. Ibid.16. Interview with Facing Hunger CEO. July 15th, 2014.17. Interview, April 27th, 2022.18. Participant Observation. WV Food for All Meeting, August 4th, 2020.19. West Virginia Legislature. House Joint Resolution 30. Right to Food, Food Sovereignty and Freedom from Hunger Amendment. Introduced March 15th, 2021.20. Interview August 5th, 2020.","PeriodicalId":137084,"journal":{"name":"Food, Culture, and Society","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The contested politics of food banking in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Lohnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15528014.2023.2274701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTRising out of the devolution of public services to private actors during the Reagan administration, the food banking economy in the United States is now a multi-billion-dollar industry. The social and political movements that institutionalized charitable food networks are diverse and often contradictory, offering a window into the politics and competing interests of a U.S. food system that has long grappled with glaring contradictions between food waste and hunger. In this paper, I analyze shifting moral economies of hunger relief within a diverse social movement (re)negotiating a set of legal codes and social norms established over the past forty years of hunger relief through charity. I argue that charitable food networks offer a window into the political contest currently unfolding over the future of the U.S. food system. As such, the debates within these spaces are critical to understand the broader politics of food provisioning in the United States.KEYWORDS: Hungercharityfood policyfood justiceemergency foodfood banksactivism AcknowledgmentsI would like to thank anti-hunger and community food security advocates in West Virginia with whom I have worked for the past 10 years and members of the Global Solidarity Alliance for Food Health and Social Justice who have helped me to articulate these thoughts over the past 3. This paper first appeared in a special issue of Politique Américaine and I would like to thank Alice Béja and that editorial team for shaping this paper for a francophone audience. I am also grateful to the two anonymous reviewers of this journal whose comments significantly improved this final version.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2023.2274701Notes1. Food banks tend to go through recurrent periods of growing pains and instability. These organizations are not always in a position of financial fragility, the past few years in fact have seen a period of capital investments into the expansion of the network. Many of the local partners do remain at risk of shutting their doors due to financial difficulties, labor shortages or other concerns. Some FA food banks remain extremely under resourced in comparison to their network peers, particularly those in large US cities whose financial clout and material imprint on food and logistics networks in their service areas continues to expand.2. Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act (62 Stat.1070; 15 U.S.C. 714). The CCC continues to be a key instrument in the function of the contemporary food system in the United States, the food banking economy is one of the beneficiaries, but it also serves many other roles in child nutrition programs, and the distribution of international food aid for example.3. Foodchain operated 150 programs across the country that recovered hot, prepared foods from catered events and restaurants for redistribution to charities. Up to that point, Second Harvest concentrated almost exclusively on securing nonperishable goods for its food bank networks and benefited from the institutional expertise and infrastructure that accompanied the merger.4. Personal Interview – Feeding America director of retail partnerships interview – April 23rd, 2015.5. Personal Interview – Feeding America product sourcing manager – May 10th, 2016.6. Funding for TEFAP bonus commodity purchases are made possible through section 32 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act which mandates that 30% of all import duties collected from customs receipts are made available to the Secretary of Agriculture for surplus removal and the encouragement of domestic food consumption. When tariffs on steel and aluminum (or any other goods) increase, the pot of money to rescue farmers from food waste crises also increases.7. Facing Hunger Food Bank Agency Meeting. November 10th, 2015.8. ibid.9. Facing Hunger CEO Interview. May 14th, 2014.10. Interview Huntington City Mission. July 15th, 2014.11. Mountaineer Food Bank Product Sourcing Manager interview. July 18th, 2016.12. Facing Hunger CEO Interview. May 14th, 2014.13. Participant Observation at Mountaineer Food Bank Hunger Summit. August 8th, 2017.14. Participant Observation at Food for Preston meeting. May 18th, 2015.15. Ibid.16. Interview with Facing Hunger CEO. July 15th, 2014.17. Interview, April 27th, 2022.18. Participant Observation. WV Food for All Meeting, August 4th, 2020.19. West Virginia Legislature. House Joint Resolution 30. Right to Food, Food Sovereignty and Freedom from Hunger Amendment. Introduced March 15th, 2021.20. Interview August 5th, 2020.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food, Culture, and Society\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food, Culture, and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2023.2274701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food, Culture, and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2023.2274701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从里根政府时期将公共服务的权力下放到私人行为者,食品银行经济在美国现在是一个数十亿美元的产业。将慈善食品网络制度化的社会和政治运动是多种多样的,而且往往是相互矛盾的,这为我们提供了一扇窗口,让我们了解美国食品系统的政治和利益竞争,而美国食品系统长期以来一直在努力解决食物浪费和饥饿之间的明显矛盾。在本文中,我分析了在一个多样化的社会运动(重新)谈判一套法律法规和社会规范在过去四十年通过慈善救济饥饿建立的道德经济变化。我认为,慈善食品网络提供了一扇窗口,让我们了解目前围绕美国食品体系未来展开的政治竞争。因此,这些空间内的辩论对于理解美国食品供应的更广泛政治至关重要。我要感谢西弗吉尼亚州的反饥饿和社区粮食安全倡导者,我和他们一起工作了10年,感谢全球粮食健康和社会正义团结联盟的成员,他们在过去的3年里帮助我阐明了这些想法。这篇文章首先出现在《政治》杂志的一期特刊上,我要感谢爱丽丝·巴萨杰和她的编辑团队为讲法语的读者撰写了这篇文章。我还要感谢两位匿名审稿人,他们的意见极大地改进了这个最终版本。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。补充材料本文的补充数据可在https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2023.2274701Notes1上在线获取。食品银行往往会经历周期性的成长痛苦和不稳定。这些组织并不总是处于财务脆弱的地位,过去几年实际上已经看到了资本投资进入网络扩张的时期。由于财政困难、劳动力短缺或其他问题,许多当地合作伙伴仍面临关门的风险。与其他网络食品银行相比,一些食品银行仍然极度缺乏资源,尤其是那些位于美国大城市的食品银行,这些城市在其服务区域内对食品和物流网络的财务影响力和物质印记仍在不断扩大。商品信贷公司章程(62 Stat.1070);15 U.S.C. 714)。CCC仍然是美国当代食品系统功能的关键工具,食品银行经济是受益者之一,但它也在儿童营养计划和国际食品援助的分配中发挥着许多其他作用。食品连锁店在全国范围内开展了150个项目,从餐饮活动和餐馆中回收热的、准备好的食物,重新分配给慈善机构。在此之前,第二丰收几乎完全专注于为其食品银行网络提供不易腐烂的货物,并从合并带来的机构专业知识和基础设施中受益。个人面试- Feeding America零售合作伙伴总监面试- 2015.5年4月23日。个人访谈- Feeding America产品采购经理- 2016.6年5月10日。《农业调整法》第32条规定,从海关收入中收取的所有进口关税的30%将提供给农业部长,用于消除过剩和鼓励国内粮食消费,从而为TEFAP奖励商品的购买提供资金。当钢铁和铝(或任何其他商品)的关税增加时,从粮食浪费危机中拯救农民的资金也会增加。面对饥饿粮食银行机构会议。2015.8年11月10日ibid.9。面对饥饿CEO访谈。2014.5月14日采访亨廷顿市教会。2014.7.15。登山食品银行产品采购经理访谈。2016.12 7月18日面对饥饿CEO访谈。2014.5月14日登山者食物银行饥饿峰会的参与者观察。2017.14年8月8日在粮食援助普雷斯顿会议上的与会者观察。2015.5.18Ibid.16。face Hunger首席执行官访谈2014年7月15日2018年4月27日访谈参与观察。世界粮食大会,2020年8月4日。西弗吉尼亚州议会。众议院联合决议30。食物权、食物主权和免于饥饿修正案。2021.20年3月15日推出。2020年8月5日采访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The contested politics of food banking in the United States
ABSTRACTRising out of the devolution of public services to private actors during the Reagan administration, the food banking economy in the United States is now a multi-billion-dollar industry. The social and political movements that institutionalized charitable food networks are diverse and often contradictory, offering a window into the politics and competing interests of a U.S. food system that has long grappled with glaring contradictions between food waste and hunger. In this paper, I analyze shifting moral economies of hunger relief within a diverse social movement (re)negotiating a set of legal codes and social norms established over the past forty years of hunger relief through charity. I argue that charitable food networks offer a window into the political contest currently unfolding over the future of the U.S. food system. As such, the debates within these spaces are critical to understand the broader politics of food provisioning in the United States.KEYWORDS: Hungercharityfood policyfood justiceemergency foodfood banksactivism AcknowledgmentsI would like to thank anti-hunger and community food security advocates in West Virginia with whom I have worked for the past 10 years and members of the Global Solidarity Alliance for Food Health and Social Justice who have helped me to articulate these thoughts over the past 3. This paper first appeared in a special issue of Politique Américaine and I would like to thank Alice Béja and that editorial team for shaping this paper for a francophone audience. I am also grateful to the two anonymous reviewers of this journal whose comments significantly improved this final version.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2023.2274701Notes1. Food banks tend to go through recurrent periods of growing pains and instability. These organizations are not always in a position of financial fragility, the past few years in fact have seen a period of capital investments into the expansion of the network. Many of the local partners do remain at risk of shutting their doors due to financial difficulties, labor shortages or other concerns. Some FA food banks remain extremely under resourced in comparison to their network peers, particularly those in large US cities whose financial clout and material imprint on food and logistics networks in their service areas continues to expand.2. Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act (62 Stat.1070; 15 U.S.C. 714). The CCC continues to be a key instrument in the function of the contemporary food system in the United States, the food banking economy is one of the beneficiaries, but it also serves many other roles in child nutrition programs, and the distribution of international food aid for example.3. Foodchain operated 150 programs across the country that recovered hot, prepared foods from catered events and restaurants for redistribution to charities. Up to that point, Second Harvest concentrated almost exclusively on securing nonperishable goods for its food bank networks and benefited from the institutional expertise and infrastructure that accompanied the merger.4. Personal Interview – Feeding America director of retail partnerships interview – April 23rd, 2015.5. Personal Interview – Feeding America product sourcing manager – May 10th, 2016.6. Funding for TEFAP bonus commodity purchases are made possible through section 32 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act which mandates that 30% of all import duties collected from customs receipts are made available to the Secretary of Agriculture for surplus removal and the encouragement of domestic food consumption. When tariffs on steel and aluminum (or any other goods) increase, the pot of money to rescue farmers from food waste crises also increases.7. Facing Hunger Food Bank Agency Meeting. November 10th, 2015.8. ibid.9. Facing Hunger CEO Interview. May 14th, 2014.10. Interview Huntington City Mission. July 15th, 2014.11. Mountaineer Food Bank Product Sourcing Manager interview. July 18th, 2016.12. Facing Hunger CEO Interview. May 14th, 2014.13. Participant Observation at Mountaineer Food Bank Hunger Summit. August 8th, 2017.14. Participant Observation at Food for Preston meeting. May 18th, 2015.15. Ibid.16. Interview with Facing Hunger CEO. July 15th, 2014.17. Interview, April 27th, 2022.18. Participant Observation. WV Food for All Meeting, August 4th, 2020.19. West Virginia Legislature. House Joint Resolution 30. Right to Food, Food Sovereignty and Freedom from Hunger Amendment. Introduced March 15th, 2021.20. Interview August 5th, 2020.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信