{"title":"案例研究:研究A2 Pasquill大气条件对重质气体扩散模拟的影响","authors":"Alia Nathani, Chee Seang Ong","doi":"10.1002/prs.12531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study provides a defensible argument for the inclusion of the A2 Pasquill weather parameter in dispersion modeling, in addition to the typical F2 and D5. The A2 parameter conservatively models gas releases that concentrate at ground level, thus allowing for a more robust design of vent heights, surrounding structures/equipment and safety measures. For this investigation, 12 case studies of common hydrocarbon and aromatic gas mixtures were developed in PHAST (Process Hazard Analysis Software Tool) version 8.6. Each case varied in temperature, release pressure (velocity), and molecular weight (MW) to simulate dense gases likely to tend toward ground level. Subsequently, each case study was modeled with the Pasquill Atmospheric Stability Classes, A2, D5, and F2, to visualize the dispersion of dense gases under different weather conditions and evaluate which weather parameter would be most inclusive of high‐severity scenarios. Results demonstrate that dense (colder than dew point, heavy, pressurized) gases yield highest ground‐level concentrations using the A2 atmospheric condition, and the further the release temperature falls below the mixture's dew point, the greater the mixture concentration at ground level. Consequence modeling recommendations are discussed, and specific gas properties are addressed that necessitate using a model that is conservative in its estimation of ground‐level concentrations.","PeriodicalId":20680,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety Progress","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case study: Investigating the effect of the <scp>A2</scp> Pasquill atmospheric condition on the dispersion modeling of heavy gases\",\"authors\":\"Alia Nathani, Chee Seang Ong\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prs.12531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study provides a defensible argument for the inclusion of the A2 Pasquill weather parameter in dispersion modeling, in addition to the typical F2 and D5. The A2 parameter conservatively models gas releases that concentrate at ground level, thus allowing for a more robust design of vent heights, surrounding structures/equipment and safety measures. For this investigation, 12 case studies of common hydrocarbon and aromatic gas mixtures were developed in PHAST (Process Hazard Analysis Software Tool) version 8.6. Each case varied in temperature, release pressure (velocity), and molecular weight (MW) to simulate dense gases likely to tend toward ground level. Subsequently, each case study was modeled with the Pasquill Atmospheric Stability Classes, A2, D5, and F2, to visualize the dispersion of dense gases under different weather conditions and evaluate which weather parameter would be most inclusive of high‐severity scenarios. Results demonstrate that dense (colder than dew point, heavy, pressurized) gases yield highest ground‐level concentrations using the A2 atmospheric condition, and the further the release temperature falls below the mixture's dew point, the greater the mixture concentration at ground level. Consequence modeling recommendations are discussed, and specific gas properties are addressed that necessitate using a model that is conservative in its estimation of ground‐level concentrations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Safety Progress\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Safety Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12531\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety Progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Case study: Investigating the effect of the A2 Pasquill atmospheric condition on the dispersion modeling of heavy gases
Abstract This study provides a defensible argument for the inclusion of the A2 Pasquill weather parameter in dispersion modeling, in addition to the typical F2 and D5. The A2 parameter conservatively models gas releases that concentrate at ground level, thus allowing for a more robust design of vent heights, surrounding structures/equipment and safety measures. For this investigation, 12 case studies of common hydrocarbon and aromatic gas mixtures were developed in PHAST (Process Hazard Analysis Software Tool) version 8.6. Each case varied in temperature, release pressure (velocity), and molecular weight (MW) to simulate dense gases likely to tend toward ground level. Subsequently, each case study was modeled with the Pasquill Atmospheric Stability Classes, A2, D5, and F2, to visualize the dispersion of dense gases under different weather conditions and evaluate which weather parameter would be most inclusive of high‐severity scenarios. Results demonstrate that dense (colder than dew point, heavy, pressurized) gases yield highest ground‐level concentrations using the A2 atmospheric condition, and the further the release temperature falls below the mixture's dew point, the greater the mixture concentration at ground level. Consequence modeling recommendations are discussed, and specific gas properties are addressed that necessitate using a model that is conservative in its estimation of ground‐level concentrations.
期刊介绍:
Process Safety Progress covers process safety for engineering professionals. It addresses such topics as incident investigations/case histories, hazardous chemicals management, hazardous leaks prevention, risk assessment, process hazards evaluation, industrial hygiene, fire and explosion analysis, preventive maintenance, vapor cloud dispersion, and regulatory compliance, training, education, and other areas in process safety and loss prevention, including emerging concerns like plant and/or process security. Papers from the annual Loss Prevention Symposium and other AIChE safety conferences are automatically considered for publication, but unsolicited papers, particularly those addressing process safety issues in emerging technologies and industries are encouraged and evaluated equally.