作为精神相互作用的语言间隔:普兹瓦拉的“动态极性”与基督教语言

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Modern Theology Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1111/moth.12895
Samuel Bickersteth
{"title":"作为精神相互作用的语言间隔:普兹瓦拉的“动态极性”与基督教语言","authors":"Samuel Bickersteth","doi":"10.1111/moth.12895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article aims to reflect on how Erich Przywara's concept of the analogical “dynamic polarity” can contribute to contemporary discussions regarding the role of language in postmodern theology. By opposing Przywara to the philosophies of the likes of John Caputo and Jacques Derrida—in particular their concept of the khôra , and the former's “weak theology” —it intends to elucidate the possibility of an approach to language which remains in keeping with the Christian theological (and thus metaphysical) tradition whilst also engaging with standard postmodern criticisms typically leveled at it. Beginning with a prefatory examination of the themes of presence, absence, and distance as they appear in Christian theology and postmodernism, it then examines how the dynamic polarity may play a conciliatory role in harmonizing the two. It then continues to employ the dynamic polarity as a basis for various forms of language, arguing that it reveals an inherently relational, dialogic, and ultimately prayerful structure of receptivity, one which constitutes and emboldens difference, enlivening it as the theatre for a fruitful analogical interplay between self and other, cataphatic and apophatic, and more.","PeriodicalId":18945,"journal":{"name":"Modern Theology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linguistic Interval as Spiritual Interplay: Przywara's “Dynamic Polarity” and Christian Language\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Bickersteth\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/moth.12895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article aims to reflect on how Erich Przywara's concept of the analogical “dynamic polarity” can contribute to contemporary discussions regarding the role of language in postmodern theology. By opposing Przywara to the philosophies of the likes of John Caputo and Jacques Derrida—in particular their concept of the khôra , and the former's “weak theology” —it intends to elucidate the possibility of an approach to language which remains in keeping with the Christian theological (and thus metaphysical) tradition whilst also engaging with standard postmodern criticisms typically leveled at it. Beginning with a prefatory examination of the themes of presence, absence, and distance as they appear in Christian theology and postmodernism, it then examines how the dynamic polarity may play a conciliatory role in harmonizing the two. It then continues to employ the dynamic polarity as a basis for various forms of language, arguing that it reveals an inherently relational, dialogic, and ultimately prayerful structure of receptivity, one which constitutes and emboldens difference, enlivening it as the theatre for a fruitful analogical interplay between self and other, cataphatic and apophatic, and more.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Theology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12895\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12895","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在反思埃里希·普兹瓦拉的类比“动态极性”概念如何有助于当代关于语言在后现代神学中的作用的讨论。通过反对普兹瓦拉与约翰·卡普托和雅克·德里达等人的哲学——特别是他们的khôra概念,以及前者的“弱神学”——它打算阐明一种语言方法的可能性,这种方法与基督教神学(因此是形而上学)传统保持一致,同时也与标准的后现代批评典型地针对它。从基督教神学和后现代主义中出现的存在、缺席和距离主题的初步检查开始,然后研究动态极性如何在协调两者方面发挥调和作用。然后,它继续使用动态极性作为各种语言形式的基础,认为它揭示了一种内在的关系,对话,最终是祈祷的接受结构,这种结构构成并鼓励了差异,使其活跃起来,成为自我与他人之间富有成效的类比相互作用的舞台,cataphatic和apophatic,等等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Linguistic Interval as Spiritual Interplay: Przywara's “Dynamic Polarity” and Christian Language
Abstract This article aims to reflect on how Erich Przywara's concept of the analogical “dynamic polarity” can contribute to contemporary discussions regarding the role of language in postmodern theology. By opposing Przywara to the philosophies of the likes of John Caputo and Jacques Derrida—in particular their concept of the khôra , and the former's “weak theology” —it intends to elucidate the possibility of an approach to language which remains in keeping with the Christian theological (and thus metaphysical) tradition whilst also engaging with standard postmodern criticisms typically leveled at it. Beginning with a prefatory examination of the themes of presence, absence, and distance as they appear in Christian theology and postmodernism, it then examines how the dynamic polarity may play a conciliatory role in harmonizing the two. It then continues to employ the dynamic polarity as a basis for various forms of language, arguing that it reveals an inherently relational, dialogic, and ultimately prayerful structure of receptivity, one which constitutes and emboldens difference, enlivening it as the theatre for a fruitful analogical interplay between self and other, cataphatic and apophatic, and more.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Modern Theology
Modern Theology RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信