熟能生巧吗?职前英语教师的隐喻感悟

Gulumser EFEOGLU
{"title":"熟能生巧吗?职前英语教师的隐喻感悟","authors":"Gulumser EFEOGLU","doi":"10.19171/uefad.1355050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How pre-service EFL teachers conceptualize their professional identities has always been part of scientific inquiry since it is one of the fundamentals of language teaching settings. Yet, uncovering its interaction with constructs such as in-class practice has been only possible via a limited set of instruments one of which is the metaphor analysis. Hence, the aim of the current study was to figure out how pre-service EFL teachers with different experience backgrounds perceive their professional identities, namely English language teachers in the form of metaphors and then to understand if in-class practice either via micro-teachings or practicum courses had any say on their preferences. Data collected from 184 participants through the metaphor analysis methodology were analyzed qualitatively in line with the framework proposed in Saban, Kocbeker, Saban (2007). Results revealed that although choices were diversified practice type tested across three groups ranging from no experience to experienced affected pre-service EFL teachers’ metaphors. In specific, it was observed that there was a focus shift from a teacher centered account to a learner centered one in line with the accumulation of in-class practice.","PeriodicalId":186052,"journal":{"name":"Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi","volume":"169 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Practice Make Really Perfect? Insights from Pre-service EFL Teachers via Metaphors\",\"authors\":\"Gulumser EFEOGLU\",\"doi\":\"10.19171/uefad.1355050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How pre-service EFL teachers conceptualize their professional identities has always been part of scientific inquiry since it is one of the fundamentals of language teaching settings. Yet, uncovering its interaction with constructs such as in-class practice has been only possible via a limited set of instruments one of which is the metaphor analysis. Hence, the aim of the current study was to figure out how pre-service EFL teachers with different experience backgrounds perceive their professional identities, namely English language teachers in the form of metaphors and then to understand if in-class practice either via micro-teachings or practicum courses had any say on their preferences. Data collected from 184 participants through the metaphor analysis methodology were analyzed qualitatively in line with the framework proposed in Saban, Kocbeker, Saban (2007). Results revealed that although choices were diversified practice type tested across three groups ranging from no experience to experienced affected pre-service EFL teachers’ metaphors. In specific, it was observed that there was a focus shift from a teacher centered account to a learner centered one in line with the accumulation of in-class practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"169 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1355050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1355050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职前英语教师如何概念化自己的专业身份一直是科学探究的一部分,因为它是语言教学环境的基础之一。然而,揭示其与诸如课堂实践等结构的相互作用只能通过一套有限的工具来实现,其中之一是隐喻分析。因此,本研究的目的是了解具有不同经验背景的职前英语教师如何以隐喻的形式感知他们的专业身份,然后了解通过微教学或实习课程进行的课堂实践是否对他们的偏好有影响。通过隐喻分析方法收集184名参与者的数据,根据Saban, Kocbeker, Saban(2007)提出的框架进行定性分析。结果显示,尽管选择是多样化的,但实践类型测试在三组中,从没有经验到有经验的影响职前英语教师的隐喻。具体来说,我们观察到,随着课堂实践的积累,重心从以教师为中心的叙述转向以学习者为中心的叙述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Practice Make Really Perfect? Insights from Pre-service EFL Teachers via Metaphors
How pre-service EFL teachers conceptualize their professional identities has always been part of scientific inquiry since it is one of the fundamentals of language teaching settings. Yet, uncovering its interaction with constructs such as in-class practice has been only possible via a limited set of instruments one of which is the metaphor analysis. Hence, the aim of the current study was to figure out how pre-service EFL teachers with different experience backgrounds perceive their professional identities, namely English language teachers in the form of metaphors and then to understand if in-class practice either via micro-teachings or practicum courses had any say on their preferences. Data collected from 184 participants through the metaphor analysis methodology were analyzed qualitatively in line with the framework proposed in Saban, Kocbeker, Saban (2007). Results revealed that although choices were diversified practice type tested across three groups ranging from no experience to experienced affected pre-service EFL teachers’ metaphors. In specific, it was observed that there was a focus shift from a teacher centered account to a learner centered one in line with the accumulation of in-class practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信