“当时我很难过,现在我觉得自由了”:这是一个检验选择退出母亲的建设性抵抗的案例

IF 2 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Melissa Yoong, Nourhan Mohamed
{"title":"“当时我很难过,现在我觉得自由了”:这是一个检验选择退出母亲的建设性抵抗的案例","authors":"Melissa Yoong, Nourhan Mohamed","doi":"10.1108/edi-08-2022-0202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose While past research has explored how opting-out enables mothers to break free from masculinist organizational cultures, less attention has been given to how they resist disciplinary power that constitutes and governs their subjectivities. This paper aims to add to the discussion of opting-out as a site of power and resistance by proposing the concept of “constructive resistance” as a productive vantage point for investigating opted-out mothers' subversive practices of self-making. Design/methodology/approach This Malaysian case study brings together the notion of constructive resistance, critical narrative analysis and APPRAISAL theory to examine the reflective stories of eighteen mothers who exited formal employment. These accounts were collected through an open-ended questionnaire and semi-structured email interviews. Findings The mothers in the sample tend to construct themselves in two main ways, as (1) valuable mothers (capable, tireless, caring mothers who are key figures in their children's lives) and (2) competent professionals. These subjectivities are parasitic on gendered and neoliberal ideals but allow the mothers to undermine neoliberal capitalist work arrangements that were incongruent with their personal values and adversely impacted their well-being, as well as refuse organizational narratives that positioned them as “failed” workers. Originality/value Whereas power is primarily seen in previous opting-out scholarship as centralized and constraining, this case study illustrates how the lens of constructive resistance can be beneficial for examining opted-out mothers' struggles against a less direct form of power that governs through the production of truths and subjectivities.","PeriodicalId":46962,"journal":{"name":"Equality Diversity and Inclusion","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“I felt sad then, I feel free now”: a case for examining the constructive resistance of opted-out mothers\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Yoong, Nourhan Mohamed\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/edi-08-2022-0202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose While past research has explored how opting-out enables mothers to break free from masculinist organizational cultures, less attention has been given to how they resist disciplinary power that constitutes and governs their subjectivities. This paper aims to add to the discussion of opting-out as a site of power and resistance by proposing the concept of “constructive resistance” as a productive vantage point for investigating opted-out mothers' subversive practices of self-making. Design/methodology/approach This Malaysian case study brings together the notion of constructive resistance, critical narrative analysis and APPRAISAL theory to examine the reflective stories of eighteen mothers who exited formal employment. These accounts were collected through an open-ended questionnaire and semi-structured email interviews. Findings The mothers in the sample tend to construct themselves in two main ways, as (1) valuable mothers (capable, tireless, caring mothers who are key figures in their children's lives) and (2) competent professionals. These subjectivities are parasitic on gendered and neoliberal ideals but allow the mothers to undermine neoliberal capitalist work arrangements that were incongruent with their personal values and adversely impacted their well-being, as well as refuse organizational narratives that positioned them as “failed” workers. Originality/value Whereas power is primarily seen in previous opting-out scholarship as centralized and constraining, this case study illustrates how the lens of constructive resistance can be beneficial for examining opted-out mothers' struggles against a less direct form of power that governs through the production of truths and subjectivities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Equality Diversity and Inclusion\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Equality Diversity and Inclusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-08-2022-0202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equality Diversity and Inclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-08-2022-0202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然过去的研究已经探讨了选择退出如何使母亲摆脱男性主义的组织文化,但很少有人关注她们如何抵制构成和支配她们主体性的纪律权力。本文旨在通过提出“建设性抵抗”的概念,将选择退出作为一种权力和抵抗的场所,作为调查选择退出母亲自我创造的颠覆性实践的有效优势,从而增加对选择退出的讨论。这个马来西亚案例研究将建设性抵抗的概念、批判性叙事分析和评估理论结合在一起,研究了18位退出正式就业的母亲的反思故事。这些账户是通过开放式问卷和半结构化电子邮件访谈收集的。样本中的母亲倾向于以两种主要方式构建自己,即(1)有价值的母亲(有能力,不知疲倦,关心孩子的母亲,是孩子生活中的关键人物)和(2)有能力的专业人士。这些主观性寄生在性别和新自由主义理想之上,但却允许母亲们破坏新自由主义资本主义的工作安排,这些安排与她们的个人价值观不一致,并对她们的福祉产生不利影响,同时拒绝将她们定位为“失败”工人的组织叙述。在之前的选择性退出研究中,权力主要被视为集中和约束的,本案例研究说明了建设性抵抗的视角如何有助于研究选择性退出母亲与一种不太直接的权力形式的斗争,这种权力形式通过真理和主观性的产生进行统治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“I felt sad then, I feel free now”: a case for examining the constructive resistance of opted-out mothers
Purpose While past research has explored how opting-out enables mothers to break free from masculinist organizational cultures, less attention has been given to how they resist disciplinary power that constitutes and governs their subjectivities. This paper aims to add to the discussion of opting-out as a site of power and resistance by proposing the concept of “constructive resistance” as a productive vantage point for investigating opted-out mothers' subversive practices of self-making. Design/methodology/approach This Malaysian case study brings together the notion of constructive resistance, critical narrative analysis and APPRAISAL theory to examine the reflective stories of eighteen mothers who exited formal employment. These accounts were collected through an open-ended questionnaire and semi-structured email interviews. Findings The mothers in the sample tend to construct themselves in two main ways, as (1) valuable mothers (capable, tireless, caring mothers who are key figures in their children's lives) and (2) competent professionals. These subjectivities are parasitic on gendered and neoliberal ideals but allow the mothers to undermine neoliberal capitalist work arrangements that were incongruent with their personal values and adversely impacted their well-being, as well as refuse organizational narratives that positioned them as “failed” workers. Originality/value Whereas power is primarily seen in previous opting-out scholarship as centralized and constraining, this case study illustrates how the lens of constructive resistance can be beneficial for examining opted-out mothers' struggles against a less direct form of power that governs through the production of truths and subjectivities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信