粉尘样品中内毒素测定的质量控制/Qualitätskontrolle der Staubproben内毒素测定

IF 0.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Verena Liebers, Maria Düser, Monika Raulf
{"title":"粉尘样品中内毒素测定的质量控制/Qualitätskontrolle der Staubproben内毒素测定","authors":"Verena Liebers, Maria Düser, Monika Raulf","doi":"10.37544/0949-8036-2023-09-10-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Endotoxin activity determination is a common tool and a surrogate marker for bioaerosol assessment and is used at workplaces especially for this purpose. The reliability of the methods used for quantification in airborne dust samples is important for exposure estimation and thus for assessing the workplace situation. Within the scope of this study, the reproducibility of the endotoxin activity values determined with the two common methods, the LAL test and the rFC test, should be determined and compared. 21 water-based dust extracts from electrostatic dust collectors (EDC) were used for repeated endotoxin quantification using LAL and rFC test. As a result, twelve independent standard curves (0-50 EU/ml) were applied showing a median coefficient of variation (CV) of 9% for rFC and 12% for LAL test. The measured endotoxin activities of the samples could be reproduced within one test as well on three consecutive days. The CV of the 7- and 8-fold measured samples was below 20%. in 92% (LAL) and 93% (rFC) of the samples. Multiple measurements of the same sample showed that the results of LAL and rFC tests are highly reproducible. To eliminate interfering factors detected by recovery of spiked samples, dilutions of the samples are valuable methodological tools. This study demonstrates that quality-assured quantification of endotoxin activity is possible with both methods and is suitable for workplace measurements using the respective Standard Operation Procedure (SOP).","PeriodicalId":55125,"journal":{"name":"Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung der Luft","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality control of endotoxin measurement in dust samples/Qualitätskontrolle der Endotoxinmessung in Staubproben\",\"authors\":\"Verena Liebers, Maria Düser, Monika Raulf\",\"doi\":\"10.37544/0949-8036-2023-09-10-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Endotoxin activity determination is a common tool and a surrogate marker for bioaerosol assessment and is used at workplaces especially for this purpose. The reliability of the methods used for quantification in airborne dust samples is important for exposure estimation and thus for assessing the workplace situation. Within the scope of this study, the reproducibility of the endotoxin activity values determined with the two common methods, the LAL test and the rFC test, should be determined and compared. 21 water-based dust extracts from electrostatic dust collectors (EDC) were used for repeated endotoxin quantification using LAL and rFC test. As a result, twelve independent standard curves (0-50 EU/ml) were applied showing a median coefficient of variation (CV) of 9% for rFC and 12% for LAL test. The measured endotoxin activities of the samples could be reproduced within one test as well on three consecutive days. The CV of the 7- and 8-fold measured samples was below 20%. in 92% (LAL) and 93% (rFC) of the samples. Multiple measurements of the same sample showed that the results of LAL and rFC tests are highly reproducible. To eliminate interfering factors detected by recovery of spiked samples, dilutions of the samples are valuable methodological tools. This study demonstrates that quality-assured quantification of endotoxin activity is possible with both methods and is suitable for workplace measurements using the respective Standard Operation Procedure (SOP).\",\"PeriodicalId\":55125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung der Luft\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung der Luft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37544/0949-8036-2023-09-10-23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung der Luft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37544/0949-8036-2023-09-10-23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内毒素活性测定是生物气溶胶评估的常用工具和替代标记物,尤其在工作场所用于此目的。用于空气中粉尘样本的量化方法的可靠性对于暴露估计和评估工作场所情况非常重要。在本研究范围内,应确定和比较两种常用方法(LAL法和rFC法)测定的内毒素活性值的可重复性。采用静电除尘器(EDC)提取的21种水基粉尘提取物,采用LAL和rFC法进行内毒素重复定量。结果,采用12条独立标准曲线(0-50 EU/ml), rFC和LAL试验的中位变异系数(CV)分别为9%和12%。测得的内毒素活性可以在一次试验中重现,也可以在连续三天内重现。7倍和8倍测量样本的CV低于20%。92% (LAL)和93% (rFC)的样品。对同一样品的多次测量表明,LAL和rFC试验的结果具有高度的可重复性。为了消除加标样品回收检测到的干扰因素,稀释样品是有价值的方法学工具。本研究表明,这两种方法都可以实现有质量保证的内毒素活性定量,并且适用于使用各自的标准操作程序(SOP)进行工作场所测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality control of endotoxin measurement in dust samples/Qualitätskontrolle der Endotoxinmessung in Staubproben
Endotoxin activity determination is a common tool and a surrogate marker for bioaerosol assessment and is used at workplaces especially for this purpose. The reliability of the methods used for quantification in airborne dust samples is important for exposure estimation and thus for assessing the workplace situation. Within the scope of this study, the reproducibility of the endotoxin activity values determined with the two common methods, the LAL test and the rFC test, should be determined and compared. 21 water-based dust extracts from electrostatic dust collectors (EDC) were used for repeated endotoxin quantification using LAL and rFC test. As a result, twelve independent standard curves (0-50 EU/ml) were applied showing a median coefficient of variation (CV) of 9% for rFC and 12% for LAL test. The measured endotoxin activities of the samples could be reproduced within one test as well on three consecutive days. The CV of the 7- and 8-fold measured samples was below 20%. in 92% (LAL) and 93% (rFC) of the samples. Multiple measurements of the same sample showed that the results of LAL and rFC tests are highly reproducible. To eliminate interfering factors detected by recovery of spiked samples, dilutions of the samples are valuable methodological tools. This study demonstrates that quality-assured quantification of endotoxin activity is possible with both methods and is suitable for workplace measurements using the respective Standard Operation Procedure (SOP).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung der Luft
Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung der Luft 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: - Expertenwissen Luftemissionen und -reinhaltung. - Filtertechniken, Lösungen zur Luftreinhaltung und Emissionsvermeidung. - Aktueller Diskurs der Community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信