不同施用时间绿肥对除草剂吲唑吡喃的植物修复潜力

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Rafaela Oliva da Silva, Beatriz Fogolari Boteon, Luiz Gustavo Castro Guidette, Bruna Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Andrea Cristina Silva Hirata, Patrícia Andrea Monquero
{"title":"不同施用时间绿肥对除草剂吲唑吡喃的植物修复潜力","authors":"Rafaela Oliva da Silva, Beatriz Fogolari Boteon, Luiz Gustavo Castro Guidette, Bruna Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Andrea Cristina Silva Hirata, Patrícia Andrea Monquero","doi":"10.21475/ajcs.23.17.08.p3920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The identification of species that promote phytoremediation of herbicides is of great relevance to reduce the impact of these products on the environment. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of plant species in the phytoremediation of the indaziflam herbicide. The phytoremediation potential for indaziflam of 15 species of green manure was evaluated at different sowing times of the Phaseolus vulgaris (bioindicator), after the herbicide application. P. vulgaris was sown after the removal of the aerial part of the selected green manure. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, and each green manure species was evaluated separately in a completely randomized design, with four replications. The treatments were arranged in a 3 x 5 factorial layout, consisting of three doses of indaziflam (0, 75 and 100g a.i. ha-¹) and five sowing times (5, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days after the herbicide application). According to the phytotoxicity and biometric evaluations of green manure, the potential species for the phytoremediation of the indaziflam were selected. The results showed that, apart from the species Lupinus albus, Canavalis ensiformis and Mucuna cinerea, the other green manure evaluated were highly susceptible to the herbicide indaziflam. However, although these potential species presented less control by indaziflam, none of them were effective in their soil phytoremediation. The bioindicator showed high phytotoxicity and reduction of dry mass due to the herbicide, regardless of the green manure sowing season on both doses of indaziflam. As a phytoremediator, none of the green manure species were effective for indaziflam even after 120 days of the herbicide application.","PeriodicalId":8581,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Crop Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential of green manure in the phytoremediation of the herbicide indaziflam after different times of application\",\"authors\":\"Rafaela Oliva da Silva, Beatriz Fogolari Boteon, Luiz Gustavo Castro Guidette, Bruna Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Andrea Cristina Silva Hirata, Patrícia Andrea Monquero\",\"doi\":\"10.21475/ajcs.23.17.08.p3920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The identification of species that promote phytoremediation of herbicides is of great relevance to reduce the impact of these products on the environment. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of plant species in the phytoremediation of the indaziflam herbicide. The phytoremediation potential for indaziflam of 15 species of green manure was evaluated at different sowing times of the Phaseolus vulgaris (bioindicator), after the herbicide application. P. vulgaris was sown after the removal of the aerial part of the selected green manure. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, and each green manure species was evaluated separately in a completely randomized design, with four replications. The treatments were arranged in a 3 x 5 factorial layout, consisting of three doses of indaziflam (0, 75 and 100g a.i. ha-¹) and five sowing times (5, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days after the herbicide application). According to the phytotoxicity and biometric evaluations of green manure, the potential species for the phytoremediation of the indaziflam were selected. The results showed that, apart from the species Lupinus albus, Canavalis ensiformis and Mucuna cinerea, the other green manure evaluated were highly susceptible to the herbicide indaziflam. However, although these potential species presented less control by indaziflam, none of them were effective in their soil phytoremediation. The bioindicator showed high phytotoxicity and reduction of dry mass due to the herbicide, regardless of the green manure sowing season on both doses of indaziflam. As a phytoremediator, none of the green manure species were effective for indaziflam even after 120 days of the herbicide application.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Crop Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Crop Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.23.17.08.p3920\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.23.17.08.p3920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴定促进除草剂植物修复的物种对减少除草剂产品对环境的影响具有重要意义。本研究旨在评价不同植物种类对茚地夫兰除草剂的植物修复效果。在施用除草剂后,对15种绿肥在不同播期(生物指示剂)下的植物修复潜力进行了评价。除去所选绿肥的地上部分后,播种青花。试验在温室内进行,采用完全随机设计,4个重复,对每种绿肥进行单独评价。处理按3 × 5因子布局,包括3个剂量(0,75和100g a.i. ha-¹)和5个播种期(除草剂施用后5、30、60、90和120 d)。根据绿肥的植物毒性和生物计量学评价,选择了具有潜在植物修复潜力的植物种。结果表明,除白Lupinus albus、Canavalis ensiformis和Mucuna cinerea外,其余绿肥对除草剂indaziflam高度敏感。然而,虽然茚地氟对这些潜在物种的控制效果较差,但它们的土壤植物修复效果均不明显。该生物指标显示,无论绿肥播种季节如何,两种剂量的indaziflam均具有较高的植物毒性和干质量的减少。作为一种植物修复剂,即使在施用除草剂120天后,绿肥中也没有一种对吲唑吡喃有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Potential of green manure in the phytoremediation of the herbicide indaziflam after different times of application
The identification of species that promote phytoremediation of herbicides is of great relevance to reduce the impact of these products on the environment. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of plant species in the phytoremediation of the indaziflam herbicide. The phytoremediation potential for indaziflam of 15 species of green manure was evaluated at different sowing times of the Phaseolus vulgaris (bioindicator), after the herbicide application. P. vulgaris was sown after the removal of the aerial part of the selected green manure. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, and each green manure species was evaluated separately in a completely randomized design, with four replications. The treatments were arranged in a 3 x 5 factorial layout, consisting of three doses of indaziflam (0, 75 and 100g a.i. ha-¹) and five sowing times (5, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days after the herbicide application). According to the phytotoxicity and biometric evaluations of green manure, the potential species for the phytoremediation of the indaziflam were selected. The results showed that, apart from the species Lupinus albus, Canavalis ensiformis and Mucuna cinerea, the other green manure evaluated were highly susceptible to the herbicide indaziflam. However, although these potential species presented less control by indaziflam, none of them were effective in their soil phytoremediation. The bioindicator showed high phytotoxicity and reduction of dry mass due to the herbicide, regardless of the green manure sowing season on both doses of indaziflam. As a phytoremediator, none of the green manure species were effective for indaziflam even after 120 days of the herbicide application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Crop Science
Australian Journal of Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信