{"title":"CM-Explorer:剖析数据摄取问题","authors":"Niels Bylois, Frank Neven, Stijn Vansummeren","doi":"10.14778/3611540.3611595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data ingestion validation, the task of certifying the quality of continuously collected data, is crucial to ensure trustworthiness of analytics insights. A widely used approach for validating data quality is to specify, either manually or automatically, so-called data unit tests that check whether data quality metrics lie within expected bounds. We employ conditional unit tests based on conditional metrics (CMs) that compute data quality signals over specific parts of the ingestion data and therefore allow for a fine-grained detection of errors. A violated conditional unit test specifies a set of erroneous tuples in a natural way: the subrelation that its CM refers to. Unfortunately, the downside of their fine-grained nature is that violating unit tests are often correlated: a single error in an ingestion batch may cause multiple tests (each referring to different parts of the batch) to fail. The key challenge is therefore to untangle this correlation and filter out the most relevant violated conditional unit tests, i.e., tests that identify a core set of erroneous tuples and act as an explanation for the errors. We present CM-Explorer, a system that supports data stewards in quickly finding the most relevant violated conditional unit tests. The system consists of three components: (1) a graph explorer for visualizing the correlation structure of the violated unit tests; (2) a relation explorer for browsing the tuples selected by conditional unit tests; and, (3) a history explorer to get insight why conditional unit tests are violated. In this paper, we discuss these components and present the different scenarios that we make available for the demonstration.","PeriodicalId":54220,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Vldb Endowment","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CM-Explorer: Dissecting Data Ingestion Problems\",\"authors\":\"Niels Bylois, Frank Neven, Stijn Vansummeren\",\"doi\":\"10.14778/3611540.3611595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data ingestion validation, the task of certifying the quality of continuously collected data, is crucial to ensure trustworthiness of analytics insights. A widely used approach for validating data quality is to specify, either manually or automatically, so-called data unit tests that check whether data quality metrics lie within expected bounds. We employ conditional unit tests based on conditional metrics (CMs) that compute data quality signals over specific parts of the ingestion data and therefore allow for a fine-grained detection of errors. A violated conditional unit test specifies a set of erroneous tuples in a natural way: the subrelation that its CM refers to. Unfortunately, the downside of their fine-grained nature is that violating unit tests are often correlated: a single error in an ingestion batch may cause multiple tests (each referring to different parts of the batch) to fail. The key challenge is therefore to untangle this correlation and filter out the most relevant violated conditional unit tests, i.e., tests that identify a core set of erroneous tuples and act as an explanation for the errors. We present CM-Explorer, a system that supports data stewards in quickly finding the most relevant violated conditional unit tests. The system consists of three components: (1) a graph explorer for visualizing the correlation structure of the violated unit tests; (2) a relation explorer for browsing the tuples selected by conditional unit tests; and, (3) a history explorer to get insight why conditional unit tests are violated. In this paper, we discuss these components and present the different scenarios that we make available for the demonstration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Vldb Endowment\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Vldb Endowment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14778/3611540.3611595\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Vldb Endowment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14778/3611540.3611595","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Data ingestion validation, the task of certifying the quality of continuously collected data, is crucial to ensure trustworthiness of analytics insights. A widely used approach for validating data quality is to specify, either manually or automatically, so-called data unit tests that check whether data quality metrics lie within expected bounds. We employ conditional unit tests based on conditional metrics (CMs) that compute data quality signals over specific parts of the ingestion data and therefore allow for a fine-grained detection of errors. A violated conditional unit test specifies a set of erroneous tuples in a natural way: the subrelation that its CM refers to. Unfortunately, the downside of their fine-grained nature is that violating unit tests are often correlated: a single error in an ingestion batch may cause multiple tests (each referring to different parts of the batch) to fail. The key challenge is therefore to untangle this correlation and filter out the most relevant violated conditional unit tests, i.e., tests that identify a core set of erroneous tuples and act as an explanation for the errors. We present CM-Explorer, a system that supports data stewards in quickly finding the most relevant violated conditional unit tests. The system consists of three components: (1) a graph explorer for visualizing the correlation structure of the violated unit tests; (2) a relation explorer for browsing the tuples selected by conditional unit tests; and, (3) a history explorer to get insight why conditional unit tests are violated. In this paper, we discuss these components and present the different scenarios that we make available for the demonstration.
期刊介绍:
The Proceedings of the VLDB (PVLDB) welcomes original research papers on a broad range of research topics related to all aspects of data management, where systems issues play a significant role, such as data management system technology and information management infrastructures, including their very large scale of experimentation, novel architectures, and demanding applications as well as their underpinning theory. The scope of a submission for PVLDB is also described by the subject areas given below. Moreover, the scope of PVLDB is restricted to scientific areas that are covered by the combined expertise on the submission’s topic of the journal’s editorial board. Finally, the submission’s contributions should build on work already published in data management outlets, e.g., PVLDB, VLDBJ, ACM SIGMOD, IEEE ICDE, EDBT, ACM TODS, IEEE TKDE, and go beyond a syntactic citation.