加拿大林业局干扰后恢复实证研究的泛加拿大评估

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
Kaysandra Waldron, Nelson Thiffault, Lisa Venier, Fidèle Bognounou, Dominique Boucher, Elizabeth Campbell, Ellen Whitman, Lucas Brehaut, Sylvie Gauthier
{"title":"加拿大林业局干扰后恢复实证研究的泛加拿大评估","authors":"Kaysandra Waldron, Nelson Thiffault, Lisa Venier, Fidèle Bognounou, Dominique Boucher, Elizabeth Campbell, Ellen Whitman, Lucas Brehaut, Sylvie Gauthier","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2022-0300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information about post-disturbance regeneration success and successional dynamics is critical to predict forest ecosystem resistance and resilience to disturbances and climate change. Our objective was to identify and classify post-disturbance empirical research conducted by the Canadian Forest Service (CFS) of Natural Resources Canada to provide guidance on future research needs, improving our understanding of post-disturbance recovery in a Canadian context. We collected and classified peer-reviewed and non-published literature produced by the department between 1998 and 2020 that concerned post-disturbance ecology. We focused on research addressing natural or anthropogenic disturbances, such as wildfires, pest outbreaks, windthrows, forest management and seismic lines. We found that forest harvesting was the disturbance most studied by CFS, followed by fire. Most studies examined changes in vegetation related to forest management and fire and they were mainly focussed on post-disturbance tree regeneration success. Our results provide a geographic overview of CFS research on post-disturbance recovery in Canada and enable the identification of key knowledge gaps. Notably, research focusing on recovery after natural disturbances was underrepresented in the assessed literature compared to studies centered around harvesting. Long-term research sites, chrono-sequences that substitute space for time, and studies focused on consecutive disturbances are especially important to maintain and establish in the face of climate change.","PeriodicalId":9483,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pan-Canadian assessment of empirical research on post-disturbance recovery in the Canadian Forest Service\",\"authors\":\"Kaysandra Waldron, Nelson Thiffault, Lisa Venier, Fidèle Bognounou, Dominique Boucher, Elizabeth Campbell, Ellen Whitman, Lucas Brehaut, Sylvie Gauthier\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cjfr-2022-0300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Information about post-disturbance regeneration success and successional dynamics is critical to predict forest ecosystem resistance and resilience to disturbances and climate change. Our objective was to identify and classify post-disturbance empirical research conducted by the Canadian Forest Service (CFS) of Natural Resources Canada to provide guidance on future research needs, improving our understanding of post-disturbance recovery in a Canadian context. We collected and classified peer-reviewed and non-published literature produced by the department between 1998 and 2020 that concerned post-disturbance ecology. We focused on research addressing natural or anthropogenic disturbances, such as wildfires, pest outbreaks, windthrows, forest management and seismic lines. We found that forest harvesting was the disturbance most studied by CFS, followed by fire. Most studies examined changes in vegetation related to forest management and fire and they were mainly focussed on post-disturbance tree regeneration success. Our results provide a geographic overview of CFS research on post-disturbance recovery in Canada and enable the identification of key knowledge gaps. Notably, research focusing on recovery after natural disturbances was underrepresented in the assessed literature compared to studies centered around harvesting. Long-term research sites, chrono-sequences that substitute space for time, and studies focused on consecutive disturbances are especially important to maintain and establish in the face of climate change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Forest Research\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Forest Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2022-0300\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2022-0300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关于干扰后再生成功和演替动态的信息对于预测森林生态系统对干扰和气候变化的抵抗力和恢复力至关重要。我们的目标是识别和分类由加拿大自然资源部的加拿大林业局(CFS)进行的干扰后实证研究,为未来的研究需求提供指导,提高我们对加拿大背景下干扰后恢复的理解。我们收集并分类了该部门在1998年至2020年期间发表的关于干扰后生态学的同行评审和未发表的文献。我们重点研究自然或人为干扰,如野火、虫害爆发、大风、森林管理和地震线。森林采伐是CFS研究最多的干扰因素,其次是火灾。大多数研究考察了与森林管理和火灾有关的植被变化,它们主要集中在干扰后树木更新的成功。我们的研究结果提供了加拿大干扰后恢复CFS研究的地理概况,并使关键知识空白得以确定。值得注意的是,与以收获为中心的研究相比,在评估文献中,关注自然干扰后恢复的研究代表性不足。长期的研究地点、用空间代替时间的时间序列以及关注连续扰动的研究对于在气候变化面前维持和建立尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A pan-Canadian assessment of empirical research on post-disturbance recovery in the Canadian Forest Service
Information about post-disturbance regeneration success and successional dynamics is critical to predict forest ecosystem resistance and resilience to disturbances and climate change. Our objective was to identify and classify post-disturbance empirical research conducted by the Canadian Forest Service (CFS) of Natural Resources Canada to provide guidance on future research needs, improving our understanding of post-disturbance recovery in a Canadian context. We collected and classified peer-reviewed and non-published literature produced by the department between 1998 and 2020 that concerned post-disturbance ecology. We focused on research addressing natural or anthropogenic disturbances, such as wildfires, pest outbreaks, windthrows, forest management and seismic lines. We found that forest harvesting was the disturbance most studied by CFS, followed by fire. Most studies examined changes in vegetation related to forest management and fire and they were mainly focussed on post-disturbance tree regeneration success. Our results provide a geographic overview of CFS research on post-disturbance recovery in Canada and enable the identification of key knowledge gaps. Notably, research focusing on recovery after natural disturbances was underrepresented in the assessed literature compared to studies centered around harvesting. Long-term research sites, chrono-sequences that substitute space for time, and studies focused on consecutive disturbances are especially important to maintain and establish in the face of climate change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1971, the Canadian Journal of Forest Research is a monthly journal that features articles, reviews, notes and concept papers on a broad spectrum of forest sciences, including biometrics, conservation, disturbances, ecology, economics, entomology, genetics, hydrology, management, nutrient cycling, pathology, physiology, remote sensing, silviculture, social sciences, soils, stand dynamics, and wood science, all in relation to the understanding or management of ecosystem services. It also publishes special issues dedicated to a topic of current interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信