评价和比较不同表面处理方式对复合材料与聚醚酮酮剪切结合强度的影响及电镜分析:体外研究

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Arushi Chopra, Roma Goswami, Deepesh Saxena, Anshul Trivedi
{"title":"评价和比较不同表面处理方式对复合材料与聚醚酮酮剪切结合强度的影响及电镜分析:体外研究","authors":"Arushi Chopra, Roma Goswami, Deepesh Saxena, Anshul Trivedi","doi":"10.4103/ccd.ccd_420_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Context: It is a challenge to bond resin materials with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK). To increase the bond strength, surface treatments using chemical adhesion, mechanical adhesion, or a combination of both can be used. Aims: The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of PEKK to the composite resin after various surface treatments and to evaluate the fracture mode analyses. Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty PEKK specimens were randomly divided into four groups ( n = 30) after three different surface treatments (95% sulfuric acid etching, airborne abrasion with 110 μm aluminum-oxide, and 99% acetone). With the help of polytetrafluorethylene tube, resin composite (3M ESPE) was bonded on all the specimens, thermocycled, and subjected to shear bond strength testing. Thereafter, 15 samples from each group were assessed for fracture mode analyses using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical Analysis Used: Mean, Standard deviation, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) f -test, post hoc Tukey’s test. Results: Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA f -test revealed that the results were significant with a P < 0.05 with the maximum value obtained in the case of air abraded group and the minimum value obtained in the case of the untreated group. Adhesive failure mode was the most common among the air-abraded group. Conclusions: The mechanical surface treatment group (air abrasion) showed higher shear bond strength than the chemical surface treatment groups (sulfuric acid and acetone). The mixed-type fracture mode was most commonly noted in the air-abraded group.","PeriodicalId":10632,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Evaluate and Compare the Effect of Various Surface Treatment Modalities on Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Polyetherketoneketone and SEM Analysis: An In vitro Study\",\"authors\":\"Arushi Chopra, Roma Goswami, Deepesh Saxena, Anshul Trivedi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ccd.ccd_420_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Context: It is a challenge to bond resin materials with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK). To increase the bond strength, surface treatments using chemical adhesion, mechanical adhesion, or a combination of both can be used. Aims: The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of PEKK to the composite resin after various surface treatments and to evaluate the fracture mode analyses. Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty PEKK specimens were randomly divided into four groups ( n = 30) after three different surface treatments (95% sulfuric acid etching, airborne abrasion with 110 μm aluminum-oxide, and 99% acetone). With the help of polytetrafluorethylene tube, resin composite (3M ESPE) was bonded on all the specimens, thermocycled, and subjected to shear bond strength testing. Thereafter, 15 samples from each group were assessed for fracture mode analyses using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical Analysis Used: Mean, Standard deviation, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) f -test, post hoc Tukey’s test. Results: Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA f -test revealed that the results were significant with a P < 0.05 with the maximum value obtained in the case of air abraded group and the minimum value obtained in the case of the untreated group. Adhesive failure mode was the most common among the air-abraded group. Conclusions: The mechanical surface treatment group (air abrasion) showed higher shear bond strength than the chemical surface treatment groups (sulfuric acid and acetone). The mixed-type fracture mode was most commonly noted in the air-abraded group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_420_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_420_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景:聚醚酮酮(PEKK)粘接树脂材料是一个挑战。为了提高粘合强度,表面处理采用化学粘合,机械粘合,或两者的组合可以使用。目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较PEKK与复合树脂在不同表面处理后的剪切结合强度,并评估断裂模式分析。材料与方法:将120个PEKK试样随机分为4组(n = 30),分别进行95%硫酸刻蚀、110 μm氧化铝气载磨蚀和99%丙酮三种不同的表面处理。在聚四氟乙烯管的帮助下,将树脂复合材料(3M ESPE)粘接在所有试件上,进行热循环,并进行剪切粘接强度测试。随后,每组取15个样品进行扫描电镜断裂模式分析。统计分析:均数、标准差、单因素方差分析(ANOVA) f检验、事后Tukey检验。结果:统计分析采用单因素方差分析f检验显示结果显著P <0.05,其中空气磨损组值最大,未处理组值最小。粘结失效模式在空气磨损组中最为常见。结论:机械表面处理组(空气磨损)比化学表面处理组(硫酸和丙酮)具有更高的剪切结合强度。混合型断裂模式在空气磨损组中最为常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To Evaluate and Compare the Effect of Various Surface Treatment Modalities on Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Polyetherketoneketone and SEM Analysis: An In vitro Study
Abstract Context: It is a challenge to bond resin materials with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK). To increase the bond strength, surface treatments using chemical adhesion, mechanical adhesion, or a combination of both can be used. Aims: The objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of PEKK to the composite resin after various surface treatments and to evaluate the fracture mode analyses. Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty PEKK specimens were randomly divided into four groups ( n = 30) after three different surface treatments (95% sulfuric acid etching, airborne abrasion with 110 μm aluminum-oxide, and 99% acetone). With the help of polytetrafluorethylene tube, resin composite (3M ESPE) was bonded on all the specimens, thermocycled, and subjected to shear bond strength testing. Thereafter, 15 samples from each group were assessed for fracture mode analyses using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical Analysis Used: Mean, Standard deviation, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) f -test, post hoc Tukey’s test. Results: Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA f -test revealed that the results were significant with a P < 0.05 with the maximum value obtained in the case of air abraded group and the minimum value obtained in the case of the untreated group. Adhesive failure mode was the most common among the air-abraded group. Conclusions: The mechanical surface treatment group (air abrasion) showed higher shear bond strength than the chemical surface treatment groups (sulfuric acid and acetone). The mixed-type fracture mode was most commonly noted in the air-abraded group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Contemporary Clinical Dentistry (CCD) (Print ISSN: 0976-237X, E-ISSN:0976- 2361) is peer-reviewed journal published on behalf of Maharishi Markandeshwar University and issues are published quarterly in the last week of March, June, September and December. The Journal publishes Original research papers, clinical studies, case series strictly of clinical interest. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of Dentistry i.e. Conservative dentistry and Endodontics, Dentofacial orthopedics and Orthodontics, Oral medicine and Radiology, Oral pathology, Oral surgery, Orodental diseases, Pediatric Dentistry, Periodontics, Clinical aspects of Public Health dentistry and Prosthodontics. Review articles are not accepted. Review, if published, will only be by invitation from eminent scholars and academicians of National and International repute in the field of Medical/Dental education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信