鼻中隔瓣重建颅底大中线肿瘤内镜切除后鼻部预后评估

Anwar Abdelatty Ibrahim, Hazem Negm, Ahmad M. Hamdan
{"title":"鼻中隔瓣重建颅底大中线肿瘤内镜切除后鼻部预后评估","authors":"Anwar Abdelatty Ibrahim, Hazem Negm, Ahmad M. Hamdan","doi":"10.1186/s43163-023-00515-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background There have been several reconstructive methods with free flaps or vascular pedicled flaps constituting a large portion of the rebuilding of the skull base. The vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap, however, appears to be the “gold standard” flap in the restoration of the integrity of the cranial base among all of the foregoing alternatives. This study aimed to assess the postoperative outcomes of endoscopic removal of large midline skull base tumors with nasoseptal flap reconstruction in 21 patients. Patients were assessed at 1 week postoperative using Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT 22) to assess postoperative nasal symptoms. An endoscopic assessment of the nose was done at 1 week postoperative to assess the degree of crusting and at 4 weeks postoperative to assess the degree of nasal adhesions and the presence or absence of gangrene of the nasoseptal flap. Postoperative complications were assessed. Results The study patients included 12 cases with pituitary macroadenoma, five cases with anterior cranial fossa meningioma, and four cases with petroclival chordoma. The skull base defect size ranged from 2.5 to 4.5 cm. The most troublesome postoperative symptoms were decreased sense of smell/taste. Postoperatively, 10 patients had mild, 7 patients had moderate, and 4 patients had severe nasal crusting. Three cases had epistaxis and two cases had postoperative cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Ten cases had no nasal adhesions, four cases had mild, four cases had moderate, and three cases had severe nasal adhesions. No cases had gangrene of the nasoseptal flap. Conclusion The nasoseptal flap is an effective option for large skull base defect reconstruction after endoscopic resection of large skull base tumors with an acceptable postoperative patient quality of life and a low incidence of postoperative complications.","PeriodicalId":321335,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of nasal outcomes after endoscopic removal of large midline skull base tumors with nasoseptal flap reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"Anwar Abdelatty Ibrahim, Hazem Negm, Ahmad M. Hamdan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43163-023-00515-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background There have been several reconstructive methods with free flaps or vascular pedicled flaps constituting a large portion of the rebuilding of the skull base. The vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap, however, appears to be the “gold standard” flap in the restoration of the integrity of the cranial base among all of the foregoing alternatives. This study aimed to assess the postoperative outcomes of endoscopic removal of large midline skull base tumors with nasoseptal flap reconstruction in 21 patients. Patients were assessed at 1 week postoperative using Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT 22) to assess postoperative nasal symptoms. An endoscopic assessment of the nose was done at 1 week postoperative to assess the degree of crusting and at 4 weeks postoperative to assess the degree of nasal adhesions and the presence or absence of gangrene of the nasoseptal flap. Postoperative complications were assessed. Results The study patients included 12 cases with pituitary macroadenoma, five cases with anterior cranial fossa meningioma, and four cases with petroclival chordoma. The skull base defect size ranged from 2.5 to 4.5 cm. The most troublesome postoperative symptoms were decreased sense of smell/taste. Postoperatively, 10 patients had mild, 7 patients had moderate, and 4 patients had severe nasal crusting. Three cases had epistaxis and two cases had postoperative cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Ten cases had no nasal adhesions, four cases had mild, four cases had moderate, and three cases had severe nasal adhesions. No cases had gangrene of the nasoseptal flap. Conclusion The nasoseptal flap is an effective option for large skull base defect reconstruction after endoscopic resection of large skull base tumors with an acceptable postoperative patient quality of life and a low incidence of postoperative complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-023-00515-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-023-00515-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景有几种重建方法,游离皮瓣或血管蒂皮瓣构成颅底重建的很大一部分。带血管蒂鼻中隔瓣,然而,似乎是“金标准”皮瓣在所有上述的选择中恢复颅底的完整性。本研究旨在评估内镜下颅底大中线肿瘤切除合并鼻中隔皮瓣重建21例患者的术后效果。术后1周使用鼻窦预后测试22 (SNOT 22)评估患者术后鼻症状。术后1周进行鼻内镜评估以评估结痂程度,术后4周评估鼻粘连程度和鼻中隔瓣是否存在坏疽。评估术后并发症。结果垂体大腺瘤12例,颅前窝脑膜瘤5例,岩斜坡脊索瘤4例。颅底缺损大小为2.5 ~ 4.5 cm。术后最麻烦的症状是嗅觉/味觉下降。术后轻度10例,中度7例,重度4例。术后3例发生鼻出血,2例发生脑脊液鼻漏。无鼻粘连10例,轻度鼻粘连4例,中度鼻粘连4例,重度鼻粘连3例。鼻中隔瓣无坏疽。结论鼻中隔皮瓣是内镜下大颅底肿瘤切除术后大颅底缺损重建的有效选择,术后患者生活质量可接受,术后并发症发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of nasal outcomes after endoscopic removal of large midline skull base tumors with nasoseptal flap reconstruction
Abstract Background There have been several reconstructive methods with free flaps or vascular pedicled flaps constituting a large portion of the rebuilding of the skull base. The vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap, however, appears to be the “gold standard” flap in the restoration of the integrity of the cranial base among all of the foregoing alternatives. This study aimed to assess the postoperative outcomes of endoscopic removal of large midline skull base tumors with nasoseptal flap reconstruction in 21 patients. Patients were assessed at 1 week postoperative using Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT 22) to assess postoperative nasal symptoms. An endoscopic assessment of the nose was done at 1 week postoperative to assess the degree of crusting and at 4 weeks postoperative to assess the degree of nasal adhesions and the presence or absence of gangrene of the nasoseptal flap. Postoperative complications were assessed. Results The study patients included 12 cases with pituitary macroadenoma, five cases with anterior cranial fossa meningioma, and four cases with petroclival chordoma. The skull base defect size ranged from 2.5 to 4.5 cm. The most troublesome postoperative symptoms were decreased sense of smell/taste. Postoperatively, 10 patients had mild, 7 patients had moderate, and 4 patients had severe nasal crusting. Three cases had epistaxis and two cases had postoperative cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Ten cases had no nasal adhesions, four cases had mild, four cases had moderate, and three cases had severe nasal adhesions. No cases had gangrene of the nasoseptal flap. Conclusion The nasoseptal flap is an effective option for large skull base defect reconstruction after endoscopic resection of large skull base tumors with an acceptable postoperative patient quality of life and a low incidence of postoperative complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信