项目,重新审视:善的人类学概念

IF 1.1 2区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Damien Droney
{"title":"项目,重新审视:善的人类学概念","authors":"Damien Droney","doi":"10.1177/14634996231202589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I revisit the concept of project as it has been elaborated in anthropological theory in order to evaluate its relevance for contemporary debates regarding the anthropology of the good. In anthropological theory, projects have been understood as culturally constituted desires and aspirations that endure beyond a given moment to guide social action. I identify additional theorizations of the concept of project by tracing its development through 20th-century existential phenomenology and its incorporation into anthropology. As a result, I clarify two understandings of projects: as a dimension of social action and as an existential structure. I argue for the importance of distinguishing these two dimensions of projects and propose that this more robust theorization of the concept offers analytical tools for considering the politics of the good.","PeriodicalId":51554,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Theory","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Projects, revisited: A concept for the anthropology of the good\",\"authors\":\"Damien Droney\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14634996231202589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I revisit the concept of project as it has been elaborated in anthropological theory in order to evaluate its relevance for contemporary debates regarding the anthropology of the good. In anthropological theory, projects have been understood as culturally constituted desires and aspirations that endure beyond a given moment to guide social action. I identify additional theorizations of the concept of project by tracing its development through 20th-century existential phenomenology and its incorporation into anthropology. As a result, I clarify two understandings of projects: as a dimension of social action and as an existential structure. I argue for the importance of distinguishing these two dimensions of projects and propose that this more robust theorization of the concept offers analytical tools for considering the politics of the good.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropological Theory\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropological Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996231202589\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996231202589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我重新审视了项目的概念,因为它已经在人类学理论中得到了阐述,以评估其与当代关于善的人类学辩论的相关性。在人类学理论中,项目被理解为文化构成的欲望和愿望,这些欲望和愿望持续超过给定的时刻,以指导社会行动。我通过追溯20世纪存在现象学的发展及其与人类学的结合,确定了项目概念的其他理论。因此,我澄清了对项目的两种理解:作为社会行动的维度和作为存在主义结构。我认为区分项目的这两个维度很重要,并提出这个概念的更有力的理论化为考虑善的政治提供了分析工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Projects, revisited: A concept for the anthropology of the good
In this article, I revisit the concept of project as it has been elaborated in anthropological theory in order to evaluate its relevance for contemporary debates regarding the anthropology of the good. In anthropological theory, projects have been understood as culturally constituted desires and aspirations that endure beyond a given moment to guide social action. I identify additional theorizations of the concept of project by tracing its development through 20th-century existential phenomenology and its incorporation into anthropology. As a result, I clarify two understandings of projects: as a dimension of social action and as an existential structure. I argue for the importance of distinguishing these two dimensions of projects and propose that this more robust theorization of the concept offers analytical tools for considering the politics of the good.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropological Theory
Anthropological Theory ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Anthropological Theory is an international peer reviewed journal seeking to strengthen anthropological theorizing in different areas of the world. This is an exciting forum for new insights into theoretical issues in anthropology and more broadly, social theory. Anthropological Theory publishes articles engaging with a variety of theoretical debates in areas including: * marxism * feminism * political philosophy * historical sociology * hermeneutics * critical theory * philosophy of science * biological anthropology * archaeology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信