{"title":"项目,重新审视:善的人类学概念","authors":"Damien Droney","doi":"10.1177/14634996231202589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I revisit the concept of project as it has been elaborated in anthropological theory in order to evaluate its relevance for contemporary debates regarding the anthropology of the good. In anthropological theory, projects have been understood as culturally constituted desires and aspirations that endure beyond a given moment to guide social action. I identify additional theorizations of the concept of project by tracing its development through 20th-century existential phenomenology and its incorporation into anthropology. As a result, I clarify two understandings of projects: as a dimension of social action and as an existential structure. I argue for the importance of distinguishing these two dimensions of projects and propose that this more robust theorization of the concept offers analytical tools for considering the politics of the good.","PeriodicalId":51554,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Theory","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Projects, revisited: A concept for the anthropology of the good\",\"authors\":\"Damien Droney\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14634996231202589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I revisit the concept of project as it has been elaborated in anthropological theory in order to evaluate its relevance for contemporary debates regarding the anthropology of the good. In anthropological theory, projects have been understood as culturally constituted desires and aspirations that endure beyond a given moment to guide social action. I identify additional theorizations of the concept of project by tracing its development through 20th-century existential phenomenology and its incorporation into anthropology. As a result, I clarify two understandings of projects: as a dimension of social action and as an existential structure. I argue for the importance of distinguishing these two dimensions of projects and propose that this more robust theorization of the concept offers analytical tools for considering the politics of the good.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropological Theory\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropological Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996231202589\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996231202589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Projects, revisited: A concept for the anthropology of the good
In this article, I revisit the concept of project as it has been elaborated in anthropological theory in order to evaluate its relevance for contemporary debates regarding the anthropology of the good. In anthropological theory, projects have been understood as culturally constituted desires and aspirations that endure beyond a given moment to guide social action. I identify additional theorizations of the concept of project by tracing its development through 20th-century existential phenomenology and its incorporation into anthropology. As a result, I clarify two understandings of projects: as a dimension of social action and as an existential structure. I argue for the importance of distinguishing these two dimensions of projects and propose that this more robust theorization of the concept offers analytical tools for considering the politics of the good.
期刊介绍:
Anthropological Theory is an international peer reviewed journal seeking to strengthen anthropological theorizing in different areas of the world. This is an exciting forum for new insights into theoretical issues in anthropology and more broadly, social theory. Anthropological Theory publishes articles engaging with a variety of theoretical debates in areas including: * marxism * feminism * political philosophy * historical sociology * hermeneutics * critical theory * philosophy of science * biological anthropology * archaeology