政治游戏?伊斯坦布尔运河项目的争议

IF 1.2 3区社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES

Turkish Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1080/14683849.2023.2262090

Ezgi Pehlivanli, Hande Eslen-Ziya

{"title":"政治游戏?伊斯坦布尔运河项目的争议","authors":"Ezgi Pehlivanli, Hande Eslen-Ziya","doi":"10.1080/14683849.2023.2262090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to understand how ideologies become embedded in political projects through strategies of legitimation aimed at justifying specific ideas, beliefs, and emotions. By using the political negotiation between the Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the Republican People’s Party (CHP) concerning the Canal Istanbul Project as an illustrative example from Turkey to ‘ideology in action’, this article shows how various rhetorical combinations appeal to an analysis of ‘ideology at work’. Our analysis is based on 20 in-depth interviews with both opponents and supporters of the project, in addition to a comparison of two official websites providing scientific evidence from each party’s perspective. The results show that the two poles of the dispute aim to recruit more people as their political supporters by using their own scientific reports with claims that they are ‘objective’ and aspire for the benefit of Istanbul.","PeriodicalId":47071,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Studies","volume":"2011 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A political game?: the dispute over the Canal Istanbul project\",\"authors\":\"Ezgi Pehlivanli, Hande Eslen-Ziya\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14683849.2023.2262090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to understand how ideologies become embedded in political projects through strategies of legitimation aimed at justifying specific ideas, beliefs, and emotions. By using the political negotiation between the Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the Republican People’s Party (CHP) concerning the Canal Istanbul Project as an illustrative example from Turkey to ‘ideology in action’, this article shows how various rhetorical combinations appeal to an analysis of ‘ideology at work’. Our analysis is based on 20 in-depth interviews with both opponents and supporters of the project, in addition to a comparison of two official websites providing scientific evidence from each party’s perspective. The results show that the two poles of the dispute aim to recruit more people as their political supporters by using their own scientific reports with claims that they are ‘objective’ and aspire for the benefit of Istanbul.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Studies\",\"volume\":\"2011 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2023.2262090\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2023.2262090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在了解意识形态如何通过旨在为特定的想法、信仰和情感辩护的合法化策略嵌入政治项目。本文以土耳其正义与发展党(AKP)与共和人民党(CHP)关于伊斯坦堡运河计划的政治谈判为例，说明土耳其与“行动中的意识形态”之间的不同修辞组合如何吸引对“工作中的意识形态”的分析。我们的分析基于对该项目的反对者和支持者的20次深度访谈，以及对两个官方网站的比较，这些网站从双方的角度提供了科学证据。结果表明，争论的两极旨在通过使用他们自己的科学报告来招募更多的人作为他们的政治支持者，这些报告声称他们是“客观的”，并且渴望伊斯坦布尔的利益。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A political game?: the dispute over the Canal Istanbul project

This study aims to understand how ideologies become embedded in political projects through strategies of legitimation aimed at justifying specific ideas, beliefs, and emotions. By using the political negotiation between the Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the Republican People’s Party (CHP) concerning the Canal Istanbul Project as an illustrative example from Turkey to ‘ideology in action’, this article shows how various rhetorical combinations appeal to an analysis of ‘ideology at work’. Our analysis is based on 20 in-depth interviews with both opponents and supporters of the project, in addition to a comparison of two official websites providing scientific evidence from each party’s perspective. The results show that the two poles of the dispute aim to recruit more people as their political supporters by using their own scientific reports with claims that they are ‘objective’ and aspire for the benefit of Istanbul.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Turkish Studies AREA STUDIES-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Turkey is a country whose importance is rapidly growing in international affairs. A rapidly developing democratic state with a strong economy, complex society, active party system, and powerful armed forces, Turkey is playing an increasingly critical role in Europe, the Middle East, and the Caucasus. Given Turkey"s significance and the great interest in studying its history, politics, and foreign policy, Turkish Studies presents a forum for scholarly discussion on these topics and more.