眼不见，心不烦。权利，同意和电休克疗法

Q4 Psychology

Clinical Psychology Forum Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.368.43

Lisa Morrison

{"title":"眼不见，心不烦。权利，同意和电休克疗法","authors":"Lisa Morrison","doi":"10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.368.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a commentary on an audit of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) patient information leaflets in Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, which found that they do not comply with the ethical principle of informed consent. Stigma, rights, and trauma are discussed through the authors personal experience of multiple ECT treatments and research, and potential actions to address these failings are suggested.","PeriodicalId":39686,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Forum","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Out of sight, out of mind. Rights, consent, and electroconvulsive therapy\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Morrison\",\"doi\":\"10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.368.43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is a commentary on an audit of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) patient information leaflets in Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, which found that they do not comply with the ethical principle of informed consent. Stigma, rights, and trauma are discussed through the authors personal experience of multiple ECT treatments and research, and potential actions to address these failings are suggested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Forum\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.368.43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.368.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是对北爱尔兰、苏格兰和威尔士电痉挛疗法(ECT)患者信息传单审计的评论，发现它们不符合知情同意的伦理原则。作者通过多次ECT治疗和研究的个人经验讨论了耻辱、权利和创伤，并提出了解决这些失败的潜在行动。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Out of sight, out of mind. Rights, consent, and electroconvulsive therapy

This article is a commentary on an audit of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) patient information leaflets in Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, which found that they do not comply with the ethical principle of informed consent. Stigma, rights, and trauma are discussed through the authors personal experience of multiple ECT treatments and research, and potential actions to address these failings are suggested.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Psychology Forum Psychology-Clinical Psychology

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量