{"title":"共同注意对跨加工阶段联合语言产生的影响","authors":"Giusy Cirillo, Kristof Strijkers, Elin Runnqvist, Cristina Baus","doi":"10.1080/23273798.2023.2260021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTShared attention across individuals is a crucial component of joint activities, modulating how we perceive relevant information. In this study, we explored shared attention in language production and memory across separate representation levels. In a shared go/no-go task, pairs of participants responded to objects displayed on a screen: One participant reacted according to the animacy of the object (semantic task), while her partner reacted to the first letter/phoneme (phoneme-monitoring task). Objects could require a response from either one participant, both participants or nobody. Only participants assigned to the phoneme-monitoring task were faster at responding to the joint than to alone trials. However, results from a memory recall test showed that for both partners recall was more accurate for those items to which the partner responded and for jointly responded items. Overall, our findings suggest that partners co-represent each other’s language features even when they do not engage in the same task.KEYWORDS: Shared attentionco-representationjoint memory effectcollective-prioritisation effectlanguage production AcknowledgmentsWe are grateful to Noel Nguyen for his advices and his support. We are also grateful to Xavier Alario for his supervision during the first steps of the project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis study has received financial support from the Marie Curie Actions (FP7-PEOPLE 2014–2016 under REA agreement n°623845), from the Laboratoire Parole et Langage and from Excellence Initiative of Aix-Marseille University – A*MIDEX through the Institute of Language, Communication and the Brain. G.C. was supported by the Ecole Doctorale 356 of Aix-Marseille University. C.B. was supported by the Ramon y Cajal research program (RYC2018-026174-I). E.R. has benefited from support from the French government, managed by the French National Agency for Research (ANR) through a research grant (ANR-18-CE28-0013). K.S. was supported by a research grant of the ANR (ANR-18-FRAL-0013-01).","PeriodicalId":48782,"journal":{"name":"Language Cognition and Neuroscience","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Shared Attention on joint language production across processing stages\",\"authors\":\"Giusy Cirillo, Kristof Strijkers, Elin Runnqvist, Cristina Baus\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23273798.2023.2260021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTShared attention across individuals is a crucial component of joint activities, modulating how we perceive relevant information. In this study, we explored shared attention in language production and memory across separate representation levels. In a shared go/no-go task, pairs of participants responded to objects displayed on a screen: One participant reacted according to the animacy of the object (semantic task), while her partner reacted to the first letter/phoneme (phoneme-monitoring task). Objects could require a response from either one participant, both participants or nobody. Only participants assigned to the phoneme-monitoring task were faster at responding to the joint than to alone trials. However, results from a memory recall test showed that for both partners recall was more accurate for those items to which the partner responded and for jointly responded items. Overall, our findings suggest that partners co-represent each other’s language features even when they do not engage in the same task.KEYWORDS: Shared attentionco-representationjoint memory effectcollective-prioritisation effectlanguage production AcknowledgmentsWe are grateful to Noel Nguyen for his advices and his support. We are also grateful to Xavier Alario for his supervision during the first steps of the project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis study has received financial support from the Marie Curie Actions (FP7-PEOPLE 2014–2016 under REA agreement n°623845), from the Laboratoire Parole et Langage and from Excellence Initiative of Aix-Marseille University – A*MIDEX through the Institute of Language, Communication and the Brain. G.C. was supported by the Ecole Doctorale 356 of Aix-Marseille University. C.B. was supported by the Ramon y Cajal research program (RYC2018-026174-I). E.R. has benefited from support from the French government, managed by the French National Agency for Research (ANR) through a research grant (ANR-18-CE28-0013). K.S. was supported by a research grant of the ANR (ANR-18-FRAL-0013-01).\",\"PeriodicalId\":48782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Cognition and Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"214 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Cognition and Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2023.2260021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Cognition and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2023.2260021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要个体间的共同关注是共同活动的重要组成部分,它调节着我们对相关信息的感知。在本研究中,我们探讨了不同表征水平下语言产生和记忆的共同注意。在一个共享的“走”/“不走”任务中,成对的参与者对屏幕上显示的物体做出反应:一个参与者根据物体的活力做出反应(语义任务),而她的搭档则根据第一个字母/音素做出反应(音素监测任务)。对象可能需要来自一个参与者、两个参与者或任何人的响应。只有被分配到音素监测任务的参与者对联合试验的反应比单独试验的反应快。然而,记忆回忆测试的结果表明,对于伴侣双方来说,对自己回应的项目和共同回应的项目的回忆更加准确。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,即使他们不参与相同的任务,合作伙伴也会共同代表彼此的语言特征。关键词:共同注意、共同表征、联合记忆效应、集体优先效应、语言生成感谢Noel Nguyen的建议和支持。我们也非常感谢Xavier Alario在项目最初阶段的监督。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究得到了Marie Curie Actions (FP7-PEOPLE 2014-2016, REA协议号623845)、Laboratoire Parole et Language和Aix-Marseille University - A*MIDEX卓越计划(语言、交流和大脑研究所)的资金支持。G.C.是由艾克斯-马赛大学356博士学院资助的。C.B.由Ramon y Cajal研究项目(RYC2018-026174-I)资助。E.R.项目得到了法国政府的支持,由法国国家研究局(ANR)通过一项研究补助金(ANR-18- ce28 -0013)进行管理。K.S.得到了ANR的研究资助(ANR-18- fral -0013-01)。
Effects of Shared Attention on joint language production across processing stages
ABSTRACTShared attention across individuals is a crucial component of joint activities, modulating how we perceive relevant information. In this study, we explored shared attention in language production and memory across separate representation levels. In a shared go/no-go task, pairs of participants responded to objects displayed on a screen: One participant reacted according to the animacy of the object (semantic task), while her partner reacted to the first letter/phoneme (phoneme-monitoring task). Objects could require a response from either one participant, both participants or nobody. Only participants assigned to the phoneme-monitoring task were faster at responding to the joint than to alone trials. However, results from a memory recall test showed that for both partners recall was more accurate for those items to which the partner responded and for jointly responded items. Overall, our findings suggest that partners co-represent each other’s language features even when they do not engage in the same task.KEYWORDS: Shared attentionco-representationjoint memory effectcollective-prioritisation effectlanguage production AcknowledgmentsWe are grateful to Noel Nguyen for his advices and his support. We are also grateful to Xavier Alario for his supervision during the first steps of the project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis study has received financial support from the Marie Curie Actions (FP7-PEOPLE 2014–2016 under REA agreement n°623845), from the Laboratoire Parole et Langage and from Excellence Initiative of Aix-Marseille University – A*MIDEX through the Institute of Language, Communication and the Brain. G.C. was supported by the Ecole Doctorale 356 of Aix-Marseille University. C.B. was supported by the Ramon y Cajal research program (RYC2018-026174-I). E.R. has benefited from support from the French government, managed by the French National Agency for Research (ANR) through a research grant (ANR-18-CE28-0013). K.S. was supported by a research grant of the ANR (ANR-18-FRAL-0013-01).
期刊介绍:
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience (formerly titled Language and Cognitive Processes) publishes high-quality papers taking an interdisciplinary approach to the study of brain and language, and promotes studies that integrate cognitive theoretical accounts of language and its neural bases. We publish both high quality, theoretically-motivated cognitive behavioural studies of language function, and papers which integrate cognitive theoretical accounts of language with its neurobiological foundations.
The study of language function from a cognitive neuroscience perspective has attracted intensive research interest over the last 20 years, and the development of neuroscience methodologies has significantly broadened the empirical scope of all language research. Both hemodynamic imaging and electrophysiological approaches provide new perspectives on the representation and processing of language, and place important constraints on the development of theoretical accounts of language function and its neurobiological context.