{"title":"传统和数字普惠金融对经济增长的相对影响:基于阈值回归的比较分析","authors":"Subroto Rapih, Budi Wahyono","doi":"10.1080/02692171.2023.2281460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study examines the effect of traditional and digital financial inclusion on economic growth in 130 developed and developing countries in 2014 and 2017. The motivation behind this study emerges from the critical need to discern not only how traditional and digital financial inclusion individually influence economic growth, but also to compare their relative contributions. In addition, there exists a potential non-linear relationship between traditional and digital financial inclusion, wherein both forms of financial inclusion can exert a positive influence on economic growth up to a specific threshold. For this purpose, traditional and digital financial inclusion indices were developed as distinct measures to investigate the relative contribution of each to economic growth. Cross-sectional sample splitting and threshold estimation were utilised to analyse whether the effects of each financial inclusion index on economic growth varied across different levels of digital and traditional financial inclusion. This study yielded two notable findings. First, the effect of traditional financial inclusion on economic growth is pronounced in countries with low levels of inclusion. Second, digital financial inclusion has a greater positive impact on economic growth in countries with higher levels of digital financial inclusion.KEYWORDS: Digital financial inclusionfinancial inclusioneconomic growththreshold effectJEL CLASSIFICATION: G21O4O47C31 AcknowledgementWe would like to thank the Editor Jonathan Michie and the anonymous referees for their highly constructive comments.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Availability of data and materialThe dataset of this study is included in this article as Supplemental online materialAdditional informationFundingThe authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.","PeriodicalId":51618,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Applied Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relative impact of traditional and digital financial inclusion on economic growth: a threshold regression-based comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Subroto Rapih, Budi Wahyono\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02692171.2023.2281460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis study examines the effect of traditional and digital financial inclusion on economic growth in 130 developed and developing countries in 2014 and 2017. The motivation behind this study emerges from the critical need to discern not only how traditional and digital financial inclusion individually influence economic growth, but also to compare their relative contributions. In addition, there exists a potential non-linear relationship between traditional and digital financial inclusion, wherein both forms of financial inclusion can exert a positive influence on economic growth up to a specific threshold. For this purpose, traditional and digital financial inclusion indices were developed as distinct measures to investigate the relative contribution of each to economic growth. Cross-sectional sample splitting and threshold estimation were utilised to analyse whether the effects of each financial inclusion index on economic growth varied across different levels of digital and traditional financial inclusion. This study yielded two notable findings. First, the effect of traditional financial inclusion on economic growth is pronounced in countries with low levels of inclusion. Second, digital financial inclusion has a greater positive impact on economic growth in countries with higher levels of digital financial inclusion.KEYWORDS: Digital financial inclusionfinancial inclusioneconomic growththreshold effectJEL CLASSIFICATION: G21O4O47C31 AcknowledgementWe would like to thank the Editor Jonathan Michie and the anonymous referees for their highly constructive comments.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Availability of data and materialThe dataset of this study is included in this article as Supplemental online materialAdditional informationFundingThe authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Applied Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Applied Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2023.2281460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2023.2281460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The relative impact of traditional and digital financial inclusion on economic growth: a threshold regression-based comparative analysis
ABSTRACTThis study examines the effect of traditional and digital financial inclusion on economic growth in 130 developed and developing countries in 2014 and 2017. The motivation behind this study emerges from the critical need to discern not only how traditional and digital financial inclusion individually influence economic growth, but also to compare their relative contributions. In addition, there exists a potential non-linear relationship between traditional and digital financial inclusion, wherein both forms of financial inclusion can exert a positive influence on economic growth up to a specific threshold. For this purpose, traditional and digital financial inclusion indices were developed as distinct measures to investigate the relative contribution of each to economic growth. Cross-sectional sample splitting and threshold estimation were utilised to analyse whether the effects of each financial inclusion index on economic growth varied across different levels of digital and traditional financial inclusion. This study yielded two notable findings. First, the effect of traditional financial inclusion on economic growth is pronounced in countries with low levels of inclusion. Second, digital financial inclusion has a greater positive impact on economic growth in countries with higher levels of digital financial inclusion.KEYWORDS: Digital financial inclusionfinancial inclusioneconomic growththreshold effectJEL CLASSIFICATION: G21O4O47C31 AcknowledgementWe would like to thank the Editor Jonathan Michie and the anonymous referees for their highly constructive comments.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Availability of data and materialThe dataset of this study is included in this article as Supplemental online materialAdditional informationFundingThe authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
期刊介绍:
International Review of Applied Economics is devoted to the practical applications of economic ideas. Applied economics is widely interpreted to embrace empirical work and the application of economics to the evaluation and development of economic policies. The interaction between empirical work and economic policy is an important feature of the journal. The Journal is peer reviewed and international in scope. Articles that draw lessons from the experience of one country for the benefit of others, or that seek to make cross-country comparisons are particularly welcomed. Contributions which discuss policy issues from theoretical positions neglected in other journals are also encouraged.