268例老年人上颈椎骨折的住院结果回顾性分析。

Nicolas Heinz von der Hoeh, Jonathan Keuchel, Phillip Pieroh, Ulrich Josef Albert Spiegl, Georg Osterhoff, Christoph-Eckhard Heyde
{"title":"268例老年人上颈椎骨折的住院结果回顾性分析。","authors":"Nicolas Heinz von der Hoeh, Jonathan Keuchel, Phillip Pieroh, Ulrich Josef Albert Spiegl, Georg Osterhoff, Christoph-Eckhard Heyde","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3568637/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The incidence of upper cervical fractures in elderly individuals is increasing, necessitating enhanced treatment approaches. Method A retrospective study of 268 elderly patients with upper cervical fractures was conducted to assess inpatient outcomes aged 75 and older with atlas and/or axis fractures. Patient risk was evaluated using the ASA score and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). In-hospital mortality and functional outcomes were assessed, with fracture treatment strategies following AO principles. Results Patients with C1, C2 or combined fractures did not differ in age, CCI, Barthel score or length of hospital stay (p > 0.05). C2 fractures were predominant, and the majority of patients suffered at least from a severe general disease (ASA ≥ 3). Comparing operatively and conservatively treated patients, regardless of fracture localization, revealed no significant differences in mortality, both overall and time-related. Surgical patients experienced a higher frequency of general complications, notably dyspnea. The overall mortality rate was 14.9%, with 15.7% in the nonoperative group and 14.4% in the surgical group (p = 0.8628). The overall rate of general complications was 51.4% (n = 51) in the nonoperative group and 71.9% (n = 110) in the operatively treated group. Conclusion The in-hospital mortality and morbidity of elderly patients with upper cervical fractures are high but do not significantly differ between operatively and nonoperatively treated patients. The complexity of the geriatric patient population highlights the need for peri- and postinpatient geriatric complex treatment, emphasizing the importance of establishing geriatric-specialized care structures.","PeriodicalId":500086,"journal":{"name":"Research Square (Research Square)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inpatient outcome of upper cervical fractures in the elderly: a retrospective analysis of 268 cases.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Heinz von der Hoeh, Jonathan Keuchel, Phillip Pieroh, Ulrich Josef Albert Spiegl, Georg Osterhoff, Christoph-Eckhard Heyde\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3568637/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background The incidence of upper cervical fractures in elderly individuals is increasing, necessitating enhanced treatment approaches. Method A retrospective study of 268 elderly patients with upper cervical fractures was conducted to assess inpatient outcomes aged 75 and older with atlas and/or axis fractures. Patient risk was evaluated using the ASA score and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). In-hospital mortality and functional outcomes were assessed, with fracture treatment strategies following AO principles. Results Patients with C1, C2 or combined fractures did not differ in age, CCI, Barthel score or length of hospital stay (p > 0.05). C2 fractures were predominant, and the majority of patients suffered at least from a severe general disease (ASA ≥ 3). Comparing operatively and conservatively treated patients, regardless of fracture localization, revealed no significant differences in mortality, both overall and time-related. Surgical patients experienced a higher frequency of general complications, notably dyspnea. The overall mortality rate was 14.9%, with 15.7% in the nonoperative group and 14.4% in the surgical group (p = 0.8628). The overall rate of general complications was 51.4% (n = 51) in the nonoperative group and 71.9% (n = 110) in the operatively treated group. Conclusion The in-hospital mortality and morbidity of elderly patients with upper cervical fractures are high but do not significantly differ between operatively and nonoperatively treated patients. The complexity of the geriatric patient population highlights the need for peri- and postinpatient geriatric complex treatment, emphasizing the importance of establishing geriatric-specialized care structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":500086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Square (Research Square)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Square (Research Square)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3568637/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square (Research Square)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3568637/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景上颈椎骨折在老年人中的发病率越来越高,需要改进治疗方法。方法对268例老年上颈椎骨折患者进行回顾性研究,评估75岁及以上寰椎和/或椎轴骨折的住院疗效。采用ASA评分和Charlson合并症指数(CCI)评估患者风险。评估住院死亡率和功能结局,骨折治疗策略遵循AO原则。结果C1、C2及合并骨折患者的年龄、CCI、Barthel评分及住院时间无明显差异(p >0.05)。C2骨折占主导地位,大多数患者至少患有严重的一般疾病(ASA≥3)。无论骨折定位如何,比较手术和保守治疗的患者,总体和时间相关的死亡率均无显著差异。手术患者出现一般并发症的频率更高,尤其是呼吸困难。总死亡率为14.9%,其中非手术组15.7%,手术组14.4% (p = 0.8628)。非手术组一般并发症发生率为51.4% (n = 51),手术组为71.9% (n = 110)。结论老年上颈椎骨折患者住院死亡率和发病率较高,但手术与非手术治疗无显著差异。老年患者人口的复杂性突出了对住院前后老年综合治疗的需求,强调了建立老年专科护理结构的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inpatient outcome of upper cervical fractures in the elderly: a retrospective analysis of 268 cases.
Abstract Background The incidence of upper cervical fractures in elderly individuals is increasing, necessitating enhanced treatment approaches. Method A retrospective study of 268 elderly patients with upper cervical fractures was conducted to assess inpatient outcomes aged 75 and older with atlas and/or axis fractures. Patient risk was evaluated using the ASA score and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). In-hospital mortality and functional outcomes were assessed, with fracture treatment strategies following AO principles. Results Patients with C1, C2 or combined fractures did not differ in age, CCI, Barthel score or length of hospital stay (p > 0.05). C2 fractures were predominant, and the majority of patients suffered at least from a severe general disease (ASA ≥ 3). Comparing operatively and conservatively treated patients, regardless of fracture localization, revealed no significant differences in mortality, both overall and time-related. Surgical patients experienced a higher frequency of general complications, notably dyspnea. The overall mortality rate was 14.9%, with 15.7% in the nonoperative group and 14.4% in the surgical group (p = 0.8628). The overall rate of general complications was 51.4% (n = 51) in the nonoperative group and 71.9% (n = 110) in the operatively treated group. Conclusion The in-hospital mortality and morbidity of elderly patients with upper cervical fractures are high but do not significantly differ between operatively and nonoperatively treated patients. The complexity of the geriatric patient population highlights the need for peri- and postinpatient geriatric complex treatment, emphasizing the importance of establishing geriatric-specialized care structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信