{"title":"一个立方体上有十个点","authors":"Will Traves, David Wehlau","doi":"10.1080/00029890.2023.2274240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe 16-year old Blaise Pascal found an incidence relation that holds when six points lie on a conic. A century later, Braikenridge and Maclaurin extended Pascal’s result to a straightedge construction that characterizes when six points lie on a conic. Nearly 400 years later, we develop a straightedge construction to check whether ten points lie on a cubic curve.MSC: 14H5051A20 AcknowledgmentWe thank Bernd Sturmfels for suggesting the problem to us and Mike Roth for helpful discussions. We are grateful to J. Chris Fisher for suggesting an alternate approach to Construction 2 and for encouraging feedback. The computer algebra system MAGMA [Citation4] was extremely helpful and all figures in the paper were produced using GeoGebra [Citation16], which is a great resource for developing geometric intuition. We thank the members of the Editorial Board of the MONTHLY for their suggestions and advice. We also thank the anonymous referees for carefully reading the manuscript and providing many helpful suggestions.Notes1 Apparently, Hadamard was paraphrasing Paul Painlevé [Citation19], the French mathematician and statesman who served twice as Minister of War and twice as Prime Minister of France.2 There seems to be some controversy about the spelling of Steiner’s first name. The authoritative version of his collected works [Citation23] gives the author’s name spelled with a k and the subject’s name spelled with a c. Perhaps this confusion is common among people whose work is important enough to be translated into many languages.3 https://www.cut-the-knot.org/pythagoras/PPower.shtmlAdditional informationNotes on contributorsWill TravesWILL TRAVES(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8115-1243) nearly failed freshman physics at Queen’s University but went on to become a professor and past chair of the Naval Academy mathematics department. His research interests include geometry, data science, and operations research.United States Naval Academy, Mail Stop 9E, Annapolis, MD 21402, USAtraves@usna.eduDavid WehlauDavid Wehlau(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0272-8404) received his Ph.D. from Brandeis University and is a professor and past head of the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science at the Royal Military College of Canada. He is also a professor at Queen’s University and enjoys being able to work with mathematics students at both institutions.Royal Military College of Canada, PO Box 17000 Stn Forces, Kingston, ON, K7K 7B4, Canadawehlau@rmc.ca","PeriodicalId":7761,"journal":{"name":"American Mathematical Monthly","volume":"12 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten Points on a Cubic\",\"authors\":\"Will Traves, David Wehlau\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00029890.2023.2274240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThe 16-year old Blaise Pascal found an incidence relation that holds when six points lie on a conic. A century later, Braikenridge and Maclaurin extended Pascal’s result to a straightedge construction that characterizes when six points lie on a conic. Nearly 400 years later, we develop a straightedge construction to check whether ten points lie on a cubic curve.MSC: 14H5051A20 AcknowledgmentWe thank Bernd Sturmfels for suggesting the problem to us and Mike Roth for helpful discussions. We are grateful to J. Chris Fisher for suggesting an alternate approach to Construction 2 and for encouraging feedback. The computer algebra system MAGMA [Citation4] was extremely helpful and all figures in the paper were produced using GeoGebra [Citation16], which is a great resource for developing geometric intuition. We thank the members of the Editorial Board of the MONTHLY for their suggestions and advice. We also thank the anonymous referees for carefully reading the manuscript and providing many helpful suggestions.Notes1 Apparently, Hadamard was paraphrasing Paul Painlevé [Citation19], the French mathematician and statesman who served twice as Minister of War and twice as Prime Minister of France.2 There seems to be some controversy about the spelling of Steiner’s first name. The authoritative version of his collected works [Citation23] gives the author’s name spelled with a k and the subject’s name spelled with a c. Perhaps this confusion is common among people whose work is important enough to be translated into many languages.3 https://www.cut-the-knot.org/pythagoras/PPower.shtmlAdditional informationNotes on contributorsWill TravesWILL TRAVES(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8115-1243) nearly failed freshman physics at Queen’s University but went on to become a professor and past chair of the Naval Academy mathematics department. His research interests include geometry, data science, and operations research.United States Naval Academy, Mail Stop 9E, Annapolis, MD 21402, USAtraves@usna.eduDavid WehlauDavid Wehlau(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0272-8404) received his Ph.D. from Brandeis University and is a professor and past head of the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science at the Royal Military College of Canada. He is also a professor at Queen’s University and enjoys being able to work with mathematics students at both institutions.Royal Military College of Canada, PO Box 17000 Stn Forces, Kingston, ON, K7K 7B4, Canadawehlau@rmc.ca\",\"PeriodicalId\":7761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Mathematical Monthly\",\"volume\":\"12 12\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Mathematical Monthly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.2023.2274240\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Mathematical Monthly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.2023.2274240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
AbstractThe 16-year old Blaise Pascal found an incidence relation that holds when six points lie on a conic. A century later, Braikenridge and Maclaurin extended Pascal’s result to a straightedge construction that characterizes when six points lie on a conic. Nearly 400 years later, we develop a straightedge construction to check whether ten points lie on a cubic curve.MSC: 14H5051A20 AcknowledgmentWe thank Bernd Sturmfels for suggesting the problem to us and Mike Roth for helpful discussions. We are grateful to J. Chris Fisher for suggesting an alternate approach to Construction 2 and for encouraging feedback. The computer algebra system MAGMA [Citation4] was extremely helpful and all figures in the paper were produced using GeoGebra [Citation16], which is a great resource for developing geometric intuition. We thank the members of the Editorial Board of the MONTHLY for their suggestions and advice. We also thank the anonymous referees for carefully reading the manuscript and providing many helpful suggestions.Notes1 Apparently, Hadamard was paraphrasing Paul Painlevé [Citation19], the French mathematician and statesman who served twice as Minister of War and twice as Prime Minister of France.2 There seems to be some controversy about the spelling of Steiner’s first name. The authoritative version of his collected works [Citation23] gives the author’s name spelled with a k and the subject’s name spelled with a c. Perhaps this confusion is common among people whose work is important enough to be translated into many languages.3 https://www.cut-the-knot.org/pythagoras/PPower.shtmlAdditional informationNotes on contributorsWill TravesWILL TRAVES(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8115-1243) nearly failed freshman physics at Queen’s University but went on to become a professor and past chair of the Naval Academy mathematics department. His research interests include geometry, data science, and operations research.United States Naval Academy, Mail Stop 9E, Annapolis, MD 21402, USAtraves@usna.eduDavid WehlauDavid Wehlau(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0272-8404) received his Ph.D. from Brandeis University and is a professor and past head of the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science at the Royal Military College of Canada. He is also a professor at Queen’s University and enjoys being able to work with mathematics students at both institutions.Royal Military College of Canada, PO Box 17000 Stn Forces, Kingston, ON, K7K 7B4, Canadawehlau@rmc.ca
期刊介绍:
The Monthly''s readers expect a high standard of exposition; they look for articles that inform, stimulate, challenge, enlighten, and even entertain. Monthly articles are meant to be read, enjoyed, and discussed, rather than just archived. Articles may be expositions of old or new results, historical or biographical essays, speculations or definitive treatments, broad developments, or explorations of a single application. Novelty and generality are far less important than clarity of exposition and broad appeal. Appropriate figures, diagrams, and photographs are encouraged.
Notes are short, sharply focused, and possibly informal. They are often gems that provide a new proof of an old theorem, a novel presentation of a familiar theme, or a lively discussion of a single issue.
Abstracts for articles or notes should entice the prospective reader into exploring the subject of the paper and should make it clear to the reader why this paper is interesting and important. The abstract should highlight the concepts of the paper rather than summarize the mechanics. The abstract is the first impression of the paper, not a technical summary of the paper. Excessive use of notation is discouraged as it can limit the interest of the broad readership of the MAA, and can limit search-ability of the article.