{"title":"利用校正后的数值天气预报产品短期预报蒸发皿每日蒸发量","authors":"Li Yao, Xinqin Gu, Lifeng Wu","doi":"10.1061/jhyeff.heeng-5966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerical weather prediction (NWP) can provide vital information for pan evaporation (Ep) forecasts for the 16 days ahead, which is of great help to water resources management. However, the information for forecasting Ep usually requires bias corrections. This study was based on three bias correction methods [the equidistant cumulative distribution function method (EDCDFm; M1), XGBoost (XGB) with a single meteorological factor input (M2), and XGB with multiple meteorological factor input (M3)] and the meteorological data from 18 weather stations in southern China, the bias correction of meteorological factors forecasted by the second-generation Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFSv2) was carried out. The results indicated the bias correction ability of the M3 method for GEFSv2 outputs was better than that of the M1 and M2 methods. It was a model-data error between GEFSv2 outputs and the corresponding observation data. Solar radiation exhibited the lowest error, whereas minimum temperature exhibited the highest. However, the M3 method decreased the forecast model-data error. In addition, this study compared the ability of three tree-based models to forecast Ep, namely, M5Tree (M5T), random forest (RF), and XGB. The XGB model had the highest forecasting accuracy for Ep. When the NWP outputs corrected by M1, M2, and M3 methods were used as the input of the XGB model, the averages of mean absolute errors (MAEs) at the 18 stations during the 1–16 day period ranged at 0.99–1.69, 0.78–1.14, and 0.78–1.07 mm/day, respectively. EP forecast showed the most significant error in the summer. Further, the relative humidity contributed the most to the Ep forecasting error. By addressing the issue of NWP outputs applied to Ep forecast, this study improves understanding of the bias correction method of NWP outputs and tree-based models to forecast Ep. It also improves understanding of the seasonal performance of Ep forecast and the impact of meteorological factors on forecast error that can inform future studies and models.","PeriodicalId":54800,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrologic Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-Term Forecasting of Daily Pan Evaporation Using Corrected Numerical Weather Forecasts Products\",\"authors\":\"Li Yao, Xinqin Gu, Lifeng Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1061/jhyeff.heeng-5966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Numerical weather prediction (NWP) can provide vital information for pan evaporation (Ep) forecasts for the 16 days ahead, which is of great help to water resources management. However, the information for forecasting Ep usually requires bias corrections. This study was based on three bias correction methods [the equidistant cumulative distribution function method (EDCDFm; M1), XGBoost (XGB) with a single meteorological factor input (M2), and XGB with multiple meteorological factor input (M3)] and the meteorological data from 18 weather stations in southern China, the bias correction of meteorological factors forecasted by the second-generation Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFSv2) was carried out. The results indicated the bias correction ability of the M3 method for GEFSv2 outputs was better than that of the M1 and M2 methods. It was a model-data error between GEFSv2 outputs and the corresponding observation data. Solar radiation exhibited the lowest error, whereas minimum temperature exhibited the highest. However, the M3 method decreased the forecast model-data error. In addition, this study compared the ability of three tree-based models to forecast Ep, namely, M5Tree (M5T), random forest (RF), and XGB. The XGB model had the highest forecasting accuracy for Ep. When the NWP outputs corrected by M1, M2, and M3 methods were used as the input of the XGB model, the averages of mean absolute errors (MAEs) at the 18 stations during the 1–16 day period ranged at 0.99–1.69, 0.78–1.14, and 0.78–1.07 mm/day, respectively. EP forecast showed the most significant error in the summer. Further, the relative humidity contributed the most to the Ep forecasting error. By addressing the issue of NWP outputs applied to Ep forecast, this study improves understanding of the bias correction method of NWP outputs and tree-based models to forecast Ep. It also improves understanding of the seasonal performance of Ep forecast and the impact of meteorological factors on forecast error that can inform future studies and models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrologic Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrologic Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1061/jhyeff.heeng-5966\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrologic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/jhyeff.heeng-5966","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Short-Term Forecasting of Daily Pan Evaporation Using Corrected Numerical Weather Forecasts Products
Numerical weather prediction (NWP) can provide vital information for pan evaporation (Ep) forecasts for the 16 days ahead, which is of great help to water resources management. However, the information for forecasting Ep usually requires bias corrections. This study was based on three bias correction methods [the equidistant cumulative distribution function method (EDCDFm; M1), XGBoost (XGB) with a single meteorological factor input (M2), and XGB with multiple meteorological factor input (M3)] and the meteorological data from 18 weather stations in southern China, the bias correction of meteorological factors forecasted by the second-generation Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFSv2) was carried out. The results indicated the bias correction ability of the M3 method for GEFSv2 outputs was better than that of the M1 and M2 methods. It was a model-data error between GEFSv2 outputs and the corresponding observation data. Solar radiation exhibited the lowest error, whereas minimum temperature exhibited the highest. However, the M3 method decreased the forecast model-data error. In addition, this study compared the ability of three tree-based models to forecast Ep, namely, M5Tree (M5T), random forest (RF), and XGB. The XGB model had the highest forecasting accuracy for Ep. When the NWP outputs corrected by M1, M2, and M3 methods were used as the input of the XGB model, the averages of mean absolute errors (MAEs) at the 18 stations during the 1–16 day period ranged at 0.99–1.69, 0.78–1.14, and 0.78–1.07 mm/day, respectively. EP forecast showed the most significant error in the summer. Further, the relative humidity contributed the most to the Ep forecasting error. By addressing the issue of NWP outputs applied to Ep forecast, this study improves understanding of the bias correction method of NWP outputs and tree-based models to forecast Ep. It also improves understanding of the seasonal performance of Ep forecast and the impact of meteorological factors on forecast error that can inform future studies and models.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrologic Engineering disseminates information on the development of new hydrologic methods, theories, and applications to current engineering problems. The journal publishes papers on analytical, numerical, and experimental methods for the investigation and modeling of hydrological processes.