超声BI-RADS在可触及乳房肿块患者中评估乳腺癌的临床应用:诊断测试的准确性

Vismit Gami, Dev Desai, Sahil Shah, Devang Rana
{"title":"超声BI-RADS在可触及乳房肿块患者中评估乳腺癌的临床应用:诊断测试的准确性","authors":"Vismit Gami, Dev Desai, Sahil Shah, Devang Rana","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.08.23298253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Diagnosing and staging breast cancer with an easy and widely useable method that can be employed worldwide in the poorest and wealthiest settings is important. Mammography is a technique that might not be available in faraway clinics and it is technically challenging whereas USG can be available in most remote areas and small hospitals far from tertiary care hospitals. Even a trainee Radiology resident can use USG BIRADS and can be used diagnostically for that, it is important to define its, diagnostic accuracy with Sensitivity, Specificity, and other diagnostic parameters. Aims: - To determine the Diagnostic accuracy of USG BIRADS compared to the gold standard Histopathology report Methodology A Retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. a total of 84 female patients presenting to Surgical OPD with complaints of a breast lump or pain were enrolled from their records. Their Breast USG results were analyzed to identify their BIRADS stage correctly and then their corresponding Histopathology report was considered the gold standard to compare the USG results against. Excel, SPSS, and Revman were used to conduct analysis and create results. Results: - 36 of these 84 patients belonged to BIRADS 1, 2, and 5 where Sensitivity, Specificity, and PPV were calculated at 100%. No one was diagnosed with BIRADS III from USG reports. For USG BIRADS 4, in total 48 patients Sensitivity was 0.667, specificity was 0.883, and PPV was 0.364. Conclusion: - Patients whose USG shows Benign growth or can be diagnosed in BIRADS 1, 2, 3, and 5 can be counted as accurate and precise. When the USG diagnosis describes the patient to be in BIRADS 4, the sensitivity and PPV show poor results showing a very low probability of the patient being truly positive when the diagnosis gives a positive result. Keywords: - USG BI-RADS, Breast lump, Histopathology, Staging of Breast Carcinoma","PeriodicalId":478577,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","volume":"16 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Utility of Ultrasonography BI-RADS in the Evaluation of Breast Cancer in Patients with Palpable Breast Masses: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Original Article\",\"authors\":\"Vismit Gami, Dev Desai, Sahil Shah, Devang Rana\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2023.11.08.23298253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Diagnosing and staging breast cancer with an easy and widely useable method that can be employed worldwide in the poorest and wealthiest settings is important. Mammography is a technique that might not be available in faraway clinics and it is technically challenging whereas USG can be available in most remote areas and small hospitals far from tertiary care hospitals. Even a trainee Radiology resident can use USG BIRADS and can be used diagnostically for that, it is important to define its, diagnostic accuracy with Sensitivity, Specificity, and other diagnostic parameters. Aims: - To determine the Diagnostic accuracy of USG BIRADS compared to the gold standard Histopathology report Methodology A Retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. a total of 84 female patients presenting to Surgical OPD with complaints of a breast lump or pain were enrolled from their records. Their Breast USG results were analyzed to identify their BIRADS stage correctly and then their corresponding Histopathology report was considered the gold standard to compare the USG results against. Excel, SPSS, and Revman were used to conduct analysis and create results. Results: - 36 of these 84 patients belonged to BIRADS 1, 2, and 5 where Sensitivity, Specificity, and PPV were calculated at 100%. No one was diagnosed with BIRADS III from USG reports. For USG BIRADS 4, in total 48 patients Sensitivity was 0.667, specificity was 0.883, and PPV was 0.364. Conclusion: - Patients whose USG shows Benign growth or can be diagnosed in BIRADS 1, 2, 3, and 5 can be counted as accurate and precise. When the USG diagnosis describes the patient to be in BIRADS 4, the sensitivity and PPV show poor results showing a very low probability of the patient being truly positive when the diagnosis gives a positive result. Keywords: - USG BI-RADS, Breast lump, Histopathology, Staging of Breast Carcinoma\",\"PeriodicalId\":478577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.08.23298253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.08.23298253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在世界上最贫穷和最富裕的环境中,用一种简单和广泛使用的方法诊断和分期乳腺癌是很重要的。乳房x线照相术是一种技术,在遥远的诊所可能无法获得,而且在技术上具有挑战性,而USG可以在大多数偏远地区和远离三级保健医院的小医院获得。即使是实习放射科住院医师也可以使用USG BIRADS进行诊断,重要的是要定义其诊断准确性,灵敏度,特异性和其他诊断参数。目的:为了确定USG BIRADS与金标准组织病理学报告方法的诊断准确性,在一家三级医院进行了一项回顾性队列研究。共有84名女性患者因乳房肿块或疼痛向外科OPD提出投诉,从他们的记录中登记。分析其乳腺USG结果以正确确定其BIRADS分期,然后将其相应的组织病理学报告视为比较USG结果的金标准。使用Excel、SPSS、Revman进行分析并生成结果。结果:84例患者中有36例属于BIRADS 1、2和5,其中敏感性、特异性和PPV计算为100%。根据美国地质调查局的报告,没有人被诊断为BIRADS III。USG BIRADS 4共48例患者,敏感性为0.667,特异性为0.883,PPV为0.364。结论:- USG表现为良性生长或能够在BIRADS 1、2、3、5中诊断的患者可被视为准确和精确。当USG诊断将患者描述为BIRADS 4时,敏感性和PPV显示较差的结果,表明当诊断给出阳性结果时,患者真正阳性的概率非常低。关键词:USG BI-RADS,乳腺肿块,组织病理学,乳腺癌分期
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Utility of Ultrasonography BI-RADS in the Evaluation of Breast Cancer in Patients with Palpable Breast Masses: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Original Article
Introduction Diagnosing and staging breast cancer with an easy and widely useable method that can be employed worldwide in the poorest and wealthiest settings is important. Mammography is a technique that might not be available in faraway clinics and it is technically challenging whereas USG can be available in most remote areas and small hospitals far from tertiary care hospitals. Even a trainee Radiology resident can use USG BIRADS and can be used diagnostically for that, it is important to define its, diagnostic accuracy with Sensitivity, Specificity, and other diagnostic parameters. Aims: - To determine the Diagnostic accuracy of USG BIRADS compared to the gold standard Histopathology report Methodology A Retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. a total of 84 female patients presenting to Surgical OPD with complaints of a breast lump or pain were enrolled from their records. Their Breast USG results were analyzed to identify their BIRADS stage correctly and then their corresponding Histopathology report was considered the gold standard to compare the USG results against. Excel, SPSS, and Revman were used to conduct analysis and create results. Results: - 36 of these 84 patients belonged to BIRADS 1, 2, and 5 where Sensitivity, Specificity, and PPV were calculated at 100%. No one was diagnosed with BIRADS III from USG reports. For USG BIRADS 4, in total 48 patients Sensitivity was 0.667, specificity was 0.883, and PPV was 0.364. Conclusion: - Patients whose USG shows Benign growth or can be diagnosed in BIRADS 1, 2, 3, and 5 can be counted as accurate and precise. When the USG diagnosis describes the patient to be in BIRADS 4, the sensitivity and PPV show poor results showing a very low probability of the patient being truly positive when the diagnosis gives a positive result. Keywords: - USG BI-RADS, Breast lump, Histopathology, Staging of Breast Carcinoma
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信