Gilad Margolis, Ofir Goldhaber, Mark Kazatsker, Ofer Kobo, Ariel Roguin, Eran Leshem
{"title":"心房颤动导管消融在癌症患者中的应用趋势和住院结果","authors":"Gilad Margolis, Ofir Goldhaber, Mark Kazatsker, Ofer Kobo, Ariel Roguin, Eran Leshem","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.13.23298490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation in cancer patients was evaluated in very few studies. We aimed to investigate trends of utilizations as well as in-hospital outcomes of AF catheter ablation procedures among cancer patients, in a large inpatient US registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, patients who underwent AF catheter ablations in the US between 2012 and 2019 were identified using ICD-9/10 codes. Sociodemographic, clinical data, in-hospital procedures and outcomes as well as in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay (LOS) were collected. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between patients with and without cancer. An estimated total of 67915 patients underwent AF catheter ablation between 2012-2019 in the US. Of them, 950 (1.4%) had cancer diagnosis. Compared with non-cancer patients, patients with cancer were older, had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, as well as CHA2DS2-VASc and ATRIA bleeding indices scores. Higher rate of total complications was observed in cancer patients (10.5% vs 7.9, p<0.001) driven mainly by more bleeding and infectious complications. LOS was also significantly longer in cancer patients (4.9 ± 5.8 vs. 2.7 ± 3.0 days, p<0.001). However, no significant differences in cardiac or neurological complications as well as in-hospital mortality rates were observed and were relatively low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: AF catheter ablation in cancer patients is associated with higher bleeding and infectious complication rates, but not with increased cardiac complications or in-hospital mortality rates in a nationwide, all-comer registry.","PeriodicalId":478577,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","volume":"16 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation among Cancer Patients: Utilization Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Gilad Margolis, Ofir Goldhaber, Mark Kazatsker, Ofer Kobo, Ariel Roguin, Eran Leshem\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2023.11.13.23298490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation in cancer patients was evaluated in very few studies. We aimed to investigate trends of utilizations as well as in-hospital outcomes of AF catheter ablation procedures among cancer patients, in a large inpatient US registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, patients who underwent AF catheter ablations in the US between 2012 and 2019 were identified using ICD-9/10 codes. Sociodemographic, clinical data, in-hospital procedures and outcomes as well as in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay (LOS) were collected. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between patients with and without cancer. An estimated total of 67915 patients underwent AF catheter ablation between 2012-2019 in the US. Of them, 950 (1.4%) had cancer diagnosis. Compared with non-cancer patients, patients with cancer were older, had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, as well as CHA2DS2-VASc and ATRIA bleeding indices scores. Higher rate of total complications was observed in cancer patients (10.5% vs 7.9, p<0.001) driven mainly by more bleeding and infectious complications. LOS was also significantly longer in cancer patients (4.9 ± 5.8 vs. 2.7 ± 3.0 days, p<0.001). However, no significant differences in cardiac or neurological complications as well as in-hospital mortality rates were observed and were relatively low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: AF catheter ablation in cancer patients is associated with higher bleeding and infectious complication rates, but not with increased cardiac complications or in-hospital mortality rates in a nationwide, all-comer registry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":478577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.13.23298490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.13.23298490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:很少有研究评估心房颤动(AF)导管消融在癌症患者中的应用。我们的目的是在美国一个大型住院患者登记中调查癌症患者房颤导管消融手术的使用趋势和住院结果。方法和结果:使用国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库,使用ICD-9/10代码对2012年至2019年在美国接受房颤导管消融的患者进行识别。收集了社会人口学、临床数据、住院程序和结果以及住院死亡率和住院时间(LOS)。基线特征和住院结果在有和没有癌症的患者之间进行比较。据估计,2012-2019年间,美国共有67915名患者接受了房颤导管消融。其中950人(1.4%)被诊断为癌症。与非肿瘤患者相比,肿瘤患者年龄较大,Charlson合并症指数、CHA2DS2-VASc和心房出血指数评分较高。癌症患者的总并发症发生率较高(10.5% vs 7.9, p<0.001),主要原因是出血和感染性并发症较多。癌症患者的LOS也明显更长(4.9±5.8 vs. 2.7±3.0天,p<0.001)。然而,在心脏或神经系统并发症以及住院死亡率方面没有观察到显著差异,两组患者的死亡率都相对较低。结论:在一项全国范围内的研究中,心房颤动导管消融与癌症患者较高的出血和感染并发症发生率相关,但与心脏并发症或住院死亡率无关。
Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation among Cancer Patients: Utilization Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation in cancer patients was evaluated in very few studies. We aimed to investigate trends of utilizations as well as in-hospital outcomes of AF catheter ablation procedures among cancer patients, in a large inpatient US registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, patients who underwent AF catheter ablations in the US between 2012 and 2019 were identified using ICD-9/10 codes. Sociodemographic, clinical data, in-hospital procedures and outcomes as well as in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay (LOS) were collected. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between patients with and without cancer. An estimated total of 67915 patients underwent AF catheter ablation between 2012-2019 in the US. Of them, 950 (1.4%) had cancer diagnosis. Compared with non-cancer patients, patients with cancer were older, had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, as well as CHA2DS2-VASc and ATRIA bleeding indices scores. Higher rate of total complications was observed in cancer patients (10.5% vs 7.9, p<0.001) driven mainly by more bleeding and infectious complications. LOS was also significantly longer in cancer patients (4.9 ± 5.8 vs. 2.7 ± 3.0 days, p<0.001). However, no significant differences in cardiac or neurological complications as well as in-hospital mortality rates were observed and were relatively low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: AF catheter ablation in cancer patients is associated with higher bleeding and infectious complication rates, but not with increased cardiac complications or in-hospital mortality rates in a nationwide, all-comer registry.