带刻度整流罩的发动机排气羽流的数值评估

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Mohamed Arif Mohamed, Zhen Wei Teo, Tze How New, Bing Feng Ng
{"title":"带刻度整流罩的发动机排气羽流的数值评估","authors":"Mohamed Arif Mohamed, Zhen Wei Teo, Tze How New, Bing Feng Ng","doi":"10.1177/09544100231203408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability to predict the characteristics of engine exhaust is important to determining heat signatures on various components of the aircraft body. This is often obtained through numerical means such as RANS, which however relies closely on the choice of the turbulence model for accurate predictions. In this study, predictions of exhaust plumes from four turbulence models are compared against results from particle image velocimetry of a scaled helicopter engine exhaust. These models include the standard k − ϵ, realizable k − ϵ, shear-stress transport (SST) k − ω, and Durbin’s turbulence models. All four turbulence models managed to capture the general shape of the exhaust when analyzed through the velocity contours at two measurement windows. However, the comparisons of velocity contours fail to describe the shift of the predicted plume from the experiments, which is important for fuselage/tail impingement. To obtain further insights to the shifts, a visual correlation in the form of a confidence ellipse through principal component analysis (PCA) is introduced and plotted for the predicted plumes. All the models’ plume predictions showed quantifiable shifts in their mean-centers when compared to the measurements. In terms of matching the measurements’ statistical maximum variance of the plume distribution at the furthermost plane, it was found that the realizable k − ϵ performed the best among the models. On the other hand, the SST k − ω and Durbin’s model performed the best in predicting bivariate ( x and y coordinates) distribution of the plume at the furthermost plane.","PeriodicalId":54566,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G-Journal of Aerospace Engineering","volume":"29 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the numerical assessment of engine exhaust plumes with a scaled cowling\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Arif Mohamed, Zhen Wei Teo, Tze How New, Bing Feng Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09544100231203408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ability to predict the characteristics of engine exhaust is important to determining heat signatures on various components of the aircraft body. This is often obtained through numerical means such as RANS, which however relies closely on the choice of the turbulence model for accurate predictions. In this study, predictions of exhaust plumes from four turbulence models are compared against results from particle image velocimetry of a scaled helicopter engine exhaust. These models include the standard k − ϵ, realizable k − ϵ, shear-stress transport (SST) k − ω, and Durbin’s turbulence models. All four turbulence models managed to capture the general shape of the exhaust when analyzed through the velocity contours at two measurement windows. However, the comparisons of velocity contours fail to describe the shift of the predicted plume from the experiments, which is important for fuselage/tail impingement. To obtain further insights to the shifts, a visual correlation in the form of a confidence ellipse through principal component analysis (PCA) is introduced and plotted for the predicted plumes. All the models’ plume predictions showed quantifiable shifts in their mean-centers when compared to the measurements. In terms of matching the measurements’ statistical maximum variance of the plume distribution at the furthermost plane, it was found that the realizable k − ϵ performed the best among the models. On the other hand, the SST k − ω and Durbin’s model performed the best in predicting bivariate ( x and y coordinates) distribution of the plume at the furthermost plane.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G-Journal of Aerospace Engineering\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G-Journal of Aerospace Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544100231203408\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G-Journal of Aerospace Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544100231203408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预测发动机排气特性的能力对于确定飞机机体各部件的热特征非常重要。这通常是通过诸如RANS之类的数值方法获得的,然而,它密切依赖于湍流模型的选择来进行准确的预测。在这项研究中,四种湍流模型的排气羽流预测与缩放直升机发动机排气的粒子图像测速结果进行了比较。这些模型包括标准k−ε、可实现k−ε、剪切应力输运(SST) k−ω和Durbin湍流模型。当通过两个测量窗口的速度轮廓进行分析时,所有四种湍流模型都设法捕获了排气的一般形状。然而,速度轮廓的比较无法描述预测羽流与实验的位移,而这对于机身/尾部撞击是很重要的。为了进一步了解这些变化,通过主成分分析(PCA)引入并绘制了预测羽流的置信椭圆形式的视觉相关性。与测量结果相比,所有模型的羽流预测都显示出其平均中心的可量化变化。在与最远平面羽流分布的测量值的统计最大方差匹配方面,发现可实现的k−御柱在模型中表现最好。另一方面,SST k−ω和Durbin模型在预测最远平面羽流的二元(x和y坐标)分布方面表现最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the numerical assessment of engine exhaust plumes with a scaled cowling
The ability to predict the characteristics of engine exhaust is important to determining heat signatures on various components of the aircraft body. This is often obtained through numerical means such as RANS, which however relies closely on the choice of the turbulence model for accurate predictions. In this study, predictions of exhaust plumes from four turbulence models are compared against results from particle image velocimetry of a scaled helicopter engine exhaust. These models include the standard k − ϵ, realizable k − ϵ, shear-stress transport (SST) k − ω, and Durbin’s turbulence models. All four turbulence models managed to capture the general shape of the exhaust when analyzed through the velocity contours at two measurement windows. However, the comparisons of velocity contours fail to describe the shift of the predicted plume from the experiments, which is important for fuselage/tail impingement. To obtain further insights to the shifts, a visual correlation in the form of a confidence ellipse through principal component analysis (PCA) is introduced and plotted for the predicted plumes. All the models’ plume predictions showed quantifiable shifts in their mean-centers when compared to the measurements. In terms of matching the measurements’ statistical maximum variance of the plume distribution at the furthermost plane, it was found that the realizable k − ϵ performed the best among the models. On the other hand, the SST k − ω and Durbin’s model performed the best in predicting bivariate ( x and y coordinates) distribution of the plume at the furthermost plane.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
212
审稿时长
5.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aerospace Engineering is dedicated to the publication of high quality research in all branches of applied sciences and technology dealing with aircraft and spacecraft, and their support systems. "Our authorship is truly international and all efforts are made to ensure that each paper is presented in the best possible way and reaches a wide audience. "The Editorial Board is composed of recognized experts representing the technical communities of fifteen countries. The Board Members work in close cooperation with the editors, reviewers, and authors to achieve a consistent standard of well written and presented papers."Professor Rodrigo Martinez-Val, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信