从威胁到威胁:重新引入的捕食者对重新引入的猎物的影响

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
B. Stepkovitch, G. Neave, M. A. Jensen, K. Tuft, K. E. Moseby
{"title":"从威胁到威胁:重新引入的捕食者对重新引入的猎物的影响","authors":"B. Stepkovitch, G. Neave, M. A. Jensen, K. Tuft, K. E. Moseby","doi":"10.1111/acv.12920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Despite the recent global increase in projects utilizing conservation fencing, reintroductions of predators to fenced conservation reserves are rare. Reintroducing threatened predators into closed ecosystems raises potential issues of overabundance, population viability and inbreeding. In particular, impacts to resident prey species are not well studied across predator reintroductions worldwide, in part due to the difficulties in measuring predator impacts without adequate control areas. Over the 4 years following release, we used multiple lines of evidence and a paired treatment and control area to assess the potential impact of a reintroduced threatened predator, the western quoll, on four reintroduced threatened mammal species in a fenced reserve. Diet analysis, radio‐tracking and direct observation suggested that quolls killed and consumed all four reintroduced threatened native prey species, but two of these prey species (bettongs and bandicoots) were preferred prey. Abundance indices of these two prey species declined in parts of the reserve where quolls were present relative to control areas, yet local extinction did not occur. Quoll hunting behaviour suggested that these preferences may be driven, in part, by differences in the detectability and accessibility of similar‐sized prey. Dietary selection for threatened prey was reduced at times when native rodents, a highly preferred prey species, were in high abundance. The presence of rodents, coupled with the quoll‐exclusion control area and carcass dumps, may have protected reintroduced threatened prey from local extinction. Predator reintroductions to fenced reserves may help maintain ecosystem balance; however, predators may be incompatible with conservation of some threatened prey species unless alternative common prey are present or intensive management actions are implemented.","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"25 25","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From threatened to threatening: Impacts of a reintroduced predator on reintroduced prey\",\"authors\":\"B. Stepkovitch, G. Neave, M. A. Jensen, K. Tuft, K. E. Moseby\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acv.12920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Despite the recent global increase in projects utilizing conservation fencing, reintroductions of predators to fenced conservation reserves are rare. Reintroducing threatened predators into closed ecosystems raises potential issues of overabundance, population viability and inbreeding. In particular, impacts to resident prey species are not well studied across predator reintroductions worldwide, in part due to the difficulties in measuring predator impacts without adequate control areas. Over the 4 years following release, we used multiple lines of evidence and a paired treatment and control area to assess the potential impact of a reintroduced threatened predator, the western quoll, on four reintroduced threatened mammal species in a fenced reserve. Diet analysis, radio‐tracking and direct observation suggested that quolls killed and consumed all four reintroduced threatened native prey species, but two of these prey species (bettongs and bandicoots) were preferred prey. Abundance indices of these two prey species declined in parts of the reserve where quolls were present relative to control areas, yet local extinction did not occur. Quoll hunting behaviour suggested that these preferences may be driven, in part, by differences in the detectability and accessibility of similar‐sized prey. Dietary selection for threatened prey was reduced at times when native rodents, a highly preferred prey species, were in high abundance. The presence of rodents, coupled with the quoll‐exclusion control area and carcass dumps, may have protected reintroduced threatened prey from local extinction. Predator reintroductions to fenced reserves may help maintain ecosystem balance; however, predators may be incompatible with conservation of some threatened prey species unless alternative common prey are present or intensive management actions are implemented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Conservation\",\"volume\":\"25 25\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12920\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12920","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管近年来全球范围内利用保护围栏的项目有所增加,但将捕食者重新引入围栏保护区的情况很少见。将受威胁的捕食者重新引入封闭的生态系统会引发潜在的物种过剩、种群生存能力和近亲繁殖问题。特别是,在世界范围内,对捕食者重新引入对常驻猎物物种的影响还没有得到很好的研究,部分原因是在没有足够的控制区域的情况下难以测量捕食者的影响。在放生后的4年里,我们使用了多种证据和配对处理和控制区来评估重新引入的受威胁捕食者西部袋鼬对围栏保护区中四种重新引入的受威胁哺乳动物的潜在影响。饮食分析、无线电追踪和直接观察表明,袋鼬杀死并吃掉了所有四种被重新引入的受威胁的本土猎物,但其中两种猎物(白鼬和土鼬)是首选猎物。在有袋鼬的保护区,这两种猎物的丰度指数相对于对照区有所下降,但未发生局部灭绝。Quoll的狩猎行为表明,这些偏好可能在一定程度上是由相似大小猎物的可探测性和可接近性的差异所驱动的。当本地啮齿动物(一种非常受欢迎的猎物物种)的丰度很高时,对受威胁猎物的饮食选择就会减少。啮齿类动物的存在,再加上隔离鼬鼠的控制区和尸体垃圾场,可能保护了重新引入的受威胁猎物免于当地灭绝。将捕食者重新引入围栏保护区可能有助于维持生态系统平衡;然而,捕食者可能与保护某些受威胁的猎物物种不相容,除非存在其他常见猎物或实施强化管理行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

From threatened to threatening: Impacts of a reintroduced predator on reintroduced prey

From threatened to threatening: Impacts of a reintroduced predator on reintroduced prey
Abstract Despite the recent global increase in projects utilizing conservation fencing, reintroductions of predators to fenced conservation reserves are rare. Reintroducing threatened predators into closed ecosystems raises potential issues of overabundance, population viability and inbreeding. In particular, impacts to resident prey species are not well studied across predator reintroductions worldwide, in part due to the difficulties in measuring predator impacts without adequate control areas. Over the 4 years following release, we used multiple lines of evidence and a paired treatment and control area to assess the potential impact of a reintroduced threatened predator, the western quoll, on four reintroduced threatened mammal species in a fenced reserve. Diet analysis, radio‐tracking and direct observation suggested that quolls killed and consumed all four reintroduced threatened native prey species, but two of these prey species (bettongs and bandicoots) were preferred prey. Abundance indices of these two prey species declined in parts of the reserve where quolls were present relative to control areas, yet local extinction did not occur. Quoll hunting behaviour suggested that these preferences may be driven, in part, by differences in the detectability and accessibility of similar‐sized prey. Dietary selection for threatened prey was reduced at times when native rodents, a highly preferred prey species, were in high abundance. The presence of rodents, coupled with the quoll‐exclusion control area and carcass dumps, may have protected reintroduced threatened prey from local extinction. Predator reintroductions to fenced reserves may help maintain ecosystem balance; however, predators may be incompatible with conservation of some threatened prey species unless alternative common prey are present or intensive management actions are implemented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Conservation
Animal Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Conservation provides a forum for rapid publication of novel, peer-reviewed research into the conservation of animal species and their habitats. The focus is on rigorous quantitative studies of an empirical or theoretical nature, which may relate to populations, species or communities and their conservation. We encourage the submission of single-species papers that have clear broader implications for conservation of other species or systems. A central theme is to publish important new ideas of broad interest and with findings that advance the scientific basis of conservation. Subjects covered include population biology, epidemiology, evolutionary ecology, population genetics, biodiversity, biogeography, palaeobiology and conservation economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信