生命热与有组织的身体:伯克,布莱克,法国大革命和乌里岑的[第一部]书

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tara Lee
{"title":"生命热与有组织的身体:伯克,布莱克,法国大革命和乌里岑的[第一部]书","authors":"Tara Lee","doi":"10.1080/10509585.2023.2248587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDuring the French Revolution, it had become apparent that the conventional metaphor of the body politic, framed around a stable hierarchical relationship between the monarchical head and the subservient body, was no longer fit for such a purpose. Indeed, in the late eighteenth century, medical understandings of the body were far more sophisticated than ever before. This article puts Blake in intimate dialogue with Burke, Sieyès, and other revolutionary and reactionary writers who evocatively updated the body politic metaphor to describe a radically changing political landscape. Reading The [First] Book of Urizen against Blake’s neglected, unpublished The French Revolution, this article demonstrates how Blake’s biological myth, though obscure, was deeply embedded in contemporary revolutionary discourse. In doing so, this article contests assumptions in recent Blake criticism that Blake found images of freedom in the organic phenomenon of self-organization (a logic of form taken up in Burkean conservatism), emphasizing instead Blake’s indebtedness to the Hunterian doctrine of vital heat. Notes1 After all, Paine thought that political revolution was no more than the “consequence of a mental revolution priorly existing in France,” for since “the mind of the nation had changed beforehand … the new order of things has naturally followed the new order of thoughts” (93).2 Both brothers occasionally employed Blake’s engraving master James Basire (Kreiter 113–14). At one point John Hunter and Blake lived in the same vicinity (Erdman 101–02), and it is likely that Blake would have attended William Hunter’s lectures on anatomy at the Royal Academy (Connolly 35).3 Blake would have encountered the juxtaposed metaphors of growing and consuming flames as virtuous and selfish love respectively in Swedenborg’s Conjugal Love (1768). In this work, Swedenborg identifies love with vital heat: “Love therefore is the heat of the life of man (hominis), or his vital heat; the heat of the blood, and also its redness, are from this source and no other; this is an effect of the fire of the angelic sun, which is pure love” (41). This heat could also develop into more dangerous emotions: “man is enkindled, grows warm, and is set on fire, whilst his love is exalted into zeal, anger, and wrath” (362). The difference between good and evil desire is that while the one sustains and unites, the other consumes: “[T]he zeal of evil love is as an infernal flame, which of itself bursts forth, and rushes on, and is desirous to consume another” (349). Conversely, virtuous love brings us together, and “considered in itself [it] is nothing else but a desire and consequent tendency to conjunction” (43).4 The morphological similarities are particularly apparent in the 1794 copy housed at the British Library. Images of this copy can be accessed through the online Blake Archive: <http://www.blakearchive.org/copy/urizen.d>5 Urizen, described as “surging sulphureous,” has been identified as the metal etching plate (Mann 52), while the “pitch & nitre” in which Urizen rages has been identified as the stop-out varnish and nitric acid involved in the etching process (Kozlowski 419).6 As Tristanne Connolly writes, “The ‘secret’ character of the contents of Urizen’s books may be related to the appearance of the developing child as seen by the preformationists, its fully-formed parts initially invisible to the limited human eye” (82).7 As Oliver W. Lembcke and Florian Weber, editors to Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès’s essential political writings, observe in their “Introduction,” in Sieyès’s thought, “[i]t is circulation itself, not the head or heart, which defines the life of a state. Sovereignty is not a matter of hierarchy, but collaboration” (23).8 Blake was not the only one to draw on the Christian connotations of regeneration in thinking about the French Revolution. Circles associated with what would become the Constitutional Church, welcoming the Revolution as the restoration of ancient Jerusalem, used the term’s Christian connotations to juxtapose the regeneration of France through spiritual enlightenment against the “regeneration of Lycurgus” (i.e. regeneration through legislation) (Ozouf 782).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by a studentship funded by the AHRC Doctoral Training Partnership at the University of Oxford [grant number 1909128].","PeriodicalId":43566,"journal":{"name":"European Romantic Review","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vital Heat and the Organized Body: Burke, Blake, <i>The French Revolution</i> and <i>The [First] Book of Urizen</i>\",\"authors\":\"Tara Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10509585.2023.2248587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTDuring the French Revolution, it had become apparent that the conventional metaphor of the body politic, framed around a stable hierarchical relationship between the monarchical head and the subservient body, was no longer fit for such a purpose. Indeed, in the late eighteenth century, medical understandings of the body were far more sophisticated than ever before. This article puts Blake in intimate dialogue with Burke, Sieyès, and other revolutionary and reactionary writers who evocatively updated the body politic metaphor to describe a radically changing political landscape. Reading The [First] Book of Urizen against Blake’s neglected, unpublished The French Revolution, this article demonstrates how Blake’s biological myth, though obscure, was deeply embedded in contemporary revolutionary discourse. In doing so, this article contests assumptions in recent Blake criticism that Blake found images of freedom in the organic phenomenon of self-organization (a logic of form taken up in Burkean conservatism), emphasizing instead Blake’s indebtedness to the Hunterian doctrine of vital heat. Notes1 After all, Paine thought that political revolution was no more than the “consequence of a mental revolution priorly existing in France,” for since “the mind of the nation had changed beforehand … the new order of things has naturally followed the new order of thoughts” (93).2 Both brothers occasionally employed Blake’s engraving master James Basire (Kreiter 113–14). At one point John Hunter and Blake lived in the same vicinity (Erdman 101–02), and it is likely that Blake would have attended William Hunter’s lectures on anatomy at the Royal Academy (Connolly 35).3 Blake would have encountered the juxtaposed metaphors of growing and consuming flames as virtuous and selfish love respectively in Swedenborg’s Conjugal Love (1768). In this work, Swedenborg identifies love with vital heat: “Love therefore is the heat of the life of man (hominis), or his vital heat; the heat of the blood, and also its redness, are from this source and no other; this is an effect of the fire of the angelic sun, which is pure love” (41). This heat could also develop into more dangerous emotions: “man is enkindled, grows warm, and is set on fire, whilst his love is exalted into zeal, anger, and wrath” (362). The difference between good and evil desire is that while the one sustains and unites, the other consumes: “[T]he zeal of evil love is as an infernal flame, which of itself bursts forth, and rushes on, and is desirous to consume another” (349). Conversely, virtuous love brings us together, and “considered in itself [it] is nothing else but a desire and consequent tendency to conjunction” (43).4 The morphological similarities are particularly apparent in the 1794 copy housed at the British Library. Images of this copy can be accessed through the online Blake Archive: <http://www.blakearchive.org/copy/urizen.d>5 Urizen, described as “surging sulphureous,” has been identified as the metal etching plate (Mann 52), while the “pitch & nitre” in which Urizen rages has been identified as the stop-out varnish and nitric acid involved in the etching process (Kozlowski 419).6 As Tristanne Connolly writes, “The ‘secret’ character of the contents of Urizen’s books may be related to the appearance of the developing child as seen by the preformationists, its fully-formed parts initially invisible to the limited human eye” (82).7 As Oliver W. Lembcke and Florian Weber, editors to Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès’s essential political writings, observe in their “Introduction,” in Sieyès’s thought, “[i]t is circulation itself, not the head or heart, which defines the life of a state. Sovereignty is not a matter of hierarchy, but collaboration” (23).8 Blake was not the only one to draw on the Christian connotations of regeneration in thinking about the French Revolution. Circles associated with what would become the Constitutional Church, welcoming the Revolution as the restoration of ancient Jerusalem, used the term’s Christian connotations to juxtapose the regeneration of France through spiritual enlightenment against the “regeneration of Lycurgus” (i.e. regeneration through legislation) (Ozouf 782).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by a studentship funded by the AHRC Doctoral Training Partnership at the University of Oxford [grant number 1909128].\",\"PeriodicalId\":43566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Romantic Review\",\"volume\":\"138 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Romantic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509585.2023.2248587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Romantic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509585.2023.2248587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】在法国大革命期间,围绕着君主和臣服之间稳定的等级关系的政治体的传统隐喻已经变得很明显,不再适合这样的目的。事实上,在18世纪晚期,医学对身体的理解比以往任何时候都要复杂得多。这篇文章让布莱克与伯克、西伊以及其他革命和反动作家进行了亲密的对话,这些作家令人回味地更新了身体政治的隐喻,以描述急剧变化的政治景观。阅读《乌里岑的第一本书》,对照布莱克被忽视、未出版的《法国大革命》,本文展示了布莱克的生物学神话虽然晦涩,却深深嵌入了当代革命话语。在这样做的过程中,本文反驳了最近布莱克批评中的假设,即布莱克在自组织的有机现象中发现了自由的形象(伯克保守主义采用的一种形式逻辑),而是强调布莱克对亨特的生命热学说的感激。注1毕竟,潘恩认为政治革命只不过是“法国先前存在的一场精神革命的结果”,因为“国民的思想事先已经改变了……事物的新秩序自然跟着思想的新秩序而来”(93)两兄弟偶尔聘请布莱克的雕刻大师詹姆斯·贝希尔(Kreiter 113-14)。约翰·亨特和布莱克曾一度住在同一地区(Erdman 101-02),布莱克很可能在皇家学院听过威廉·亨特的解剖学讲座(Connolly 35)在斯威登堡的《夫妻间的爱》(1768)中,布莱克将成长的火焰和燃烧的火焰的并列隐喻分别视为美德和自私的爱。在这部作品中,斯威登堡将爱与生命之热等同起来:“因此,爱是人的生命之热,或者说是他的生命之热;血的热,血的红,都来自这个源头,而不是别的;这是天使般的太阳之火的结果,这是纯洁的爱”(41)。这种热情也可能发展成更危险的情绪:“人被点燃,变得温暖,并被点燃,而他的爱被提升为热情,愤怒和愤怒”(362)。善的欲望和恶的欲望之间的区别在于,前者维持和团结,而后者消耗:“恶的爱的热情就像地狱的火焰,它自己爆发,冲,并且渴望消耗另一个”(349)。相反,美德的爱使我们走到一起,并且“考虑到它本身只是一种欲望和随之而来的结合趋势”(43)在大英图书馆收藏的1794年副本中,形态上的相似性尤为明显。该复制品的图片可以通过在线Blake Archive获得:5 Urizen,被描述为“汹涌的硫磺”,已被确定为金属蚀刻板(Mann 52),而Urizen所使用的“沥青和硝石”已被确定为蚀刻过程中涉及的停止清漆和硝酸(Kozlowski 419)正如特里斯坦·康诺利(Tristanne Connolly)所写,“乌里森书中内容的‘秘密’特征可能与预成论者所看到的发育中的儿童的外貌有关,其完全成形的部分最初是有限的人眼看不见的”(82)正如伊曼纽尔·约瑟夫·西耶重要政治著作的编辑奥利弗·w·伦布克和弗洛里安·韦伯在他们的《导言》中所说,在西耶的思想中,“决定一个国家命运的是流通本身,而不是头脑或心灵。”主权不是等级问题,而是合作问题”(23)布莱克并不是唯一一个在思考法国大革命时借鉴基督教“重生”内涵的人。与后来的立宪教会有关的圈子,欢迎革命作为古耶路撒冷的恢复,使用这个词的基督教内涵,将法国通过精神启蒙的再生与“Lycurgus的再生”(即通过立法的再生)并列(Ozouf 782)。本研究由牛津大学AHRC博士培训伙伴关系资助的一项奖学金资助[资助号1909128]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vital Heat and the Organized Body: Burke, Blake, The French Revolution and The [First] Book of Urizen
ABSTRACTDuring the French Revolution, it had become apparent that the conventional metaphor of the body politic, framed around a stable hierarchical relationship between the monarchical head and the subservient body, was no longer fit for such a purpose. Indeed, in the late eighteenth century, medical understandings of the body were far more sophisticated than ever before. This article puts Blake in intimate dialogue with Burke, Sieyès, and other revolutionary and reactionary writers who evocatively updated the body politic metaphor to describe a radically changing political landscape. Reading The [First] Book of Urizen against Blake’s neglected, unpublished The French Revolution, this article demonstrates how Blake’s biological myth, though obscure, was deeply embedded in contemporary revolutionary discourse. In doing so, this article contests assumptions in recent Blake criticism that Blake found images of freedom in the organic phenomenon of self-organization (a logic of form taken up in Burkean conservatism), emphasizing instead Blake’s indebtedness to the Hunterian doctrine of vital heat. Notes1 After all, Paine thought that political revolution was no more than the “consequence of a mental revolution priorly existing in France,” for since “the mind of the nation had changed beforehand … the new order of things has naturally followed the new order of thoughts” (93).2 Both brothers occasionally employed Blake’s engraving master James Basire (Kreiter 113–14). At one point John Hunter and Blake lived in the same vicinity (Erdman 101–02), and it is likely that Blake would have attended William Hunter’s lectures on anatomy at the Royal Academy (Connolly 35).3 Blake would have encountered the juxtaposed metaphors of growing and consuming flames as virtuous and selfish love respectively in Swedenborg’s Conjugal Love (1768). In this work, Swedenborg identifies love with vital heat: “Love therefore is the heat of the life of man (hominis), or his vital heat; the heat of the blood, and also its redness, are from this source and no other; this is an effect of the fire of the angelic sun, which is pure love” (41). This heat could also develop into more dangerous emotions: “man is enkindled, grows warm, and is set on fire, whilst his love is exalted into zeal, anger, and wrath” (362). The difference between good and evil desire is that while the one sustains and unites, the other consumes: “[T]he zeal of evil love is as an infernal flame, which of itself bursts forth, and rushes on, and is desirous to consume another” (349). Conversely, virtuous love brings us together, and “considered in itself [it] is nothing else but a desire and consequent tendency to conjunction” (43).4 The morphological similarities are particularly apparent in the 1794 copy housed at the British Library. Images of this copy can be accessed through the online Blake Archive: 5 Urizen, described as “surging sulphureous,” has been identified as the metal etching plate (Mann 52), while the “pitch & nitre” in which Urizen rages has been identified as the stop-out varnish and nitric acid involved in the etching process (Kozlowski 419).6 As Tristanne Connolly writes, “The ‘secret’ character of the contents of Urizen’s books may be related to the appearance of the developing child as seen by the preformationists, its fully-formed parts initially invisible to the limited human eye” (82).7 As Oliver W. Lembcke and Florian Weber, editors to Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès’s essential political writings, observe in their “Introduction,” in Sieyès’s thought, “[i]t is circulation itself, not the head or heart, which defines the life of a state. Sovereignty is not a matter of hierarchy, but collaboration” (23).8 Blake was not the only one to draw on the Christian connotations of regeneration in thinking about the French Revolution. Circles associated with what would become the Constitutional Church, welcoming the Revolution as the restoration of ancient Jerusalem, used the term’s Christian connotations to juxtapose the regeneration of France through spiritual enlightenment against the “regeneration of Lycurgus” (i.e. regeneration through legislation) (Ozouf 782).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by a studentship funded by the AHRC Doctoral Training Partnership at the University of Oxford [grant number 1909128].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Romantic Review
European Romantic Review HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: The European Romantic Review publishes innovative scholarship on the literature and culture of Europe, Great Britain and the Americas during the period 1760-1840. Topics range from the scientific and psychological interests of German and English authors through the political and social reverberations of the French Revolution to the philosophical and ecological implications of Anglo-American nature writing. Selected papers from the annual conference of the North American Society for the Study of Romanticism appear in one of the five issues published each year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信